A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Oh come on now Rerun. Them scares were never healed. Sure people use it disingenuously for policital expediency, in the same way that Bannon is pulling your dick through Donnie.
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored.
A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Oh come on now Rerun. Them scares were never healed. Sure people use it disingenuously for policital expediency, in the same way that Bannon is pulling your dick through Donnie.
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored.
A very good article. I keep wondering why now and have my own opinion but LarryinIowa's comment at the end of the article summed it up nicely:
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Oh come on now Rerun. Them scares were never healed. Sure people use it disingenuously for policital expediency, in the same way that Bannon is pulling your dick through Donnie.
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored.
Stop Creepy you're scaresing me!
Rent check is in the male.
With that said, it is apparent that my prior poasts focusing on your lack of a good grasp of Engrish hurt a little bit. Let me be the first to extend the olive branch and say I am truly sorry. I am entirely confident that you know, and knew, the difference between affect and effect. I should not have been so indulgent.
PS: wouldn't "scareing" have been more on the mark?
Comments
"Some find it politically advantageous to reopen healed scars and divide Americans against each other. They thrive on hatred and strife. They call themselves Progressives".
Of course I love irony.
http://www.activistmom.com/blog/margaret-sanger-statue/
Gotta remind them negros that they ain't shit.
https://www.newsy.com/stories/why-confederate-monuments-exist-in-the-first-place/
Slow and painful as it was, Blacks had made some progress by then and whites were nervous. And I am talking northern whites
But please. Race has always mattered. And not just the one on this bored.
With that said, it is apparent that my prior poasts focusing on your lack of a good grasp of Engrish hurt a little bit. Let me be the first to extend the olive branch and say I am truly sorry. I am entirely confident that you know, and knew, the difference between affect and effect. I should not have been so indulgent.
PS: wouldn't "scareing" have been more on the mark?
Will you fucking learn basics?