Anyone who makes an argument for or against global warming based on surface temperature data is a retard. This study doesn't prove or disprove anything because the strongest evidence backing global warming is based on ice core sampling.
Anyone who makes an argument for or against global warming based on surface temperature data is a retard. This study doesn't prove or disprove anything because the strongest evidence backing global warming is based on ice core sampling.
Anyone who makes an argument for or against global warming based on surface temperature data is a retard. This study doesn't prove or disprove anything because the strongest evidence backing global warming is based on ice core sampling.
I'm not moving the goal posts. Climate change is measured over long time periods. The time series for surface temperature measurements is less than 100 years. You can't use temperature data to prove or disprove climate change because it doesn't go back far enough . Ice core CO2 ppm data is the crux of climate change because it goes back thousands of years.
Comments
https://thsresearch.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/ef-gast-data-research-report-062717.pdf
Yeah those right wing MIT assholes
!
You still ignore that the article is nothing close to what the reality of the actual report says. That's the epitome of fake news.
Still you don't address your fake news.
Even if it's a thing...so what? Your ac bills go up like 100 bucks over the next 100 years?
I'd be more concerned about Jake's ACL.
I'm hearing it's tender and TSIO.