Mora and Pinkel

no_uh

Neither are perfect, but would undoubtedly be huge improvements - and with ties that make them more likely to flip. At this point, I don't really have a preference between the two. Both have done very good jobs this season. Now, Sark just needs to leave.

dnc

Pinkel would be an improvement, but he's not the guy.

Still, it's impressive when your 3rd best protege is Gary Pinkel.

HeretoBeatmyChest

Pinkel is too old anyway. That ship sailed long time ago.

CuntWaffle

So we should fire Sark so we can hire Sark?

[Deleted User]

2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Sun
2007 Missouri 12–2 7–1 T–1st (North) W Cotton 5 4
2008 Missouri 10–4 5–3 T–1st (North) W Alamo 16 19
2009 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Texas
2010 Missouri 10–3 6–2 T–1st (North) L Insight 18 18
2011 Missouri 8–5[6] 5–4 5th W Independence
Missouri Tigers (Southeastern Conference) (2012–present)
2012 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (East)
2013 Missouri 7–0 3–0
Missouri: 97–61 52–48

For anyone who suggest Gary Pinkel. Do you really want a 52-48 coach in conference as our next head coach?!!

TierbsHsotBoobs

He_Needs_More_Time said:

2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Sun
2007 Missouri 12–2 7–1 T–1st (North) W Cotton 5 4
2008 Missouri 10–4 5–3 T–1st (North) W Alamo 16 19
2009 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Texas
2010 Missouri 10–3 6–2 T–1st (North) L Insight 18 18
2011 Missouri 8–5[6] 5–4 5th W Independence
Missouri Tigers (Southeastern Conference) (2012–present)
2012 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (East)
2013 Missouri 7–0 3–0
Missouri: 97–61 52–48

For anyone who suggest Gary Pinkel. Do you really want a 52-48 coach in conference as our next head coach?!!

We already have that guy.

[Deleted User]

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

2001 Missouri 4–7 3–5 T–4th (North)
2002 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (North)
2003 Missouri 8–5 4–4 3rd (North) L Independence
2004 Missouri 5–6 3–5 T–3rd (North)
2005 Missouri 7–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) W Independence
2006 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Sun
2007 Missouri 12–2 7–1 T–1st (North) W Cotton 5 4
2008 Missouri 10–4 5–3 T–1st (North) W Alamo 16 19
2009 Missouri 8–5 4–4 T–2nd (North) L Texas
2010 Missouri 10–3 6–2 T–1st (North) L Insight 18 18
2011 Missouri 8–5[6] 5–4 5th W Independence
Missouri Tigers (Southeastern Conference) (2012–present)
2012 Missouri 5–7 2–6 5th (East)
2013 Missouri 7–0 3–0
Missouri: 97–61 52–48

For anyone who suggest Gary Pinkel. Do you really want a 52-48 coach in conference as our next head coach?!!

We already have that guy.

That's my point. Pinkel's W-L is inflated because they schedule crappy OOC which is what Pool Boy is trying to do with Sark.

no_uh

I'd argue that he probably has 2x the resources he had while he was competing in the Big12, which would be similar at UW. If Pinkel doesn't make it to the SEC title game, I'll take it back. Mora also got shit kicked by Stanford. Not like either guy is perfect. UW has been out of it so long, we are closer to beggars than choosers. I don't think I'm off when I say that Sark would have a much worse record at Mizzou than Pinkel's.