Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

30 for 30 SC

creepycoug
creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
edited July 2017 in College Football Forum
So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame

No Washington?

Where's the respect?

Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
«1

Comments

  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,681 Founders Club
    washington has some great cameos in the 30 for 30s. Both 'U' episodes, Todd marinovich, I think they had something at the end of Trojan War for the 2009 USC upset being the end of the Carroll era.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067

    I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.

    Half is being generous; legions of UW fans identify with being SC's favorite runner up.
  • Neighbor2972
    Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,330
    I mean we've been irrelevant for over 15 years, its been awhile since we were more than an annoyance to them. Even now in making the playoff before them they still beat us. It will take a few years of meeting them in the P12 championship to really get the rivalry going again, especially with the fact that we don't even play them every year
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Fuck the rivalries, natty or bust.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067

    Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?

    I thought that was just a joke on this site.

    Yes. It comes up in the always thought-provoking "history" convos.

    ND and UCLA. That's who they care about.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067

    I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.

    Respectable.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    Mosster47 said:

    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.

    Quit plagiarism my shit fucko!!

    Btw, that wasn't the point of my poast. You need to get in touch with @reedstrong. He can help you.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?

    I thought that was just a joke on this site.

    They care about as much as the guy getting his cock sucked by a groupie whore cares about the whore.
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    edited July 2017

    So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

    1. UCLA; and
    2. Notre Dame

    No Washington?

    Where's the respect?

    Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

    Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

    There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.

    Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?

    this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
  • Pitchfork51
    Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,662
    Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.

    It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited July 2017
    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

    @Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.

    It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami.

    Terrible post is terrible
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited July 2017
    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    MisterEm said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

    @Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
    Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.

    Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.

    Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.

    When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.

    Mike fucking Riley.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    Baseman said:

    So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

    1. UCLA; and
    2. Notre Dame

    No Washington?

    Where's the respect?

    Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

    Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

    There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.

    Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?

    this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
    You, too, must get in touch with @reedstrong; he'll explain.

    Thanks for the scheduling heads up.

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    Guysm guysm guysm, the OP wasn't focused on the most recent SC run. That's the topic of the 30/30 but the comment made therein about ND and UCLA, as well as UW's team crush on the Trojans, is an all time thing.

    Cheese and Rice ... You all need some @reedstrong time.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,800 Founders Club
    SC probably views us as WSU except we were good once or twice and reside in Seattle.

    They don't really respect us, they just hate it when they lose to us because we pull out and slap our purple cocks around and gloat since a large portion of our players are from there. Think Jaydon Mickens making 1 fucking catch in 2015 and talking shit to their sidelines.

    Anyone who was at HS last year felt how fired up they were to beat us, but that was probably an outlier because they felt they had a chance to make something of their season again.
  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067

    This entire thread belongs on doogman. Along with the OP

    fuck you Race; the only spot in your belly more sensitive than your SC love affair is your man crush on JMJ.

    Don't judge me me; I'm a kewg - your REAL brother. Those fancy boys in LA don't even know you anymore.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,318 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.

  • creepycoug
    creepycoug Member Posts: 24,067
    edited July 2017
    haie said:

    SC probably views us as WSU except we were good once or twice and reside in Seattle.

    They don't really respect us, they just hate it when they lose to us because we pull out and slap our purple cocks around and gloat since a large portion of our players are from there. Think Jaydon Mickens making 1 fucking catch in 2015 and talking shit to their sidelines.

    Anyone who was at HS last year felt how fired up they were to beat us, but that was probably an outlier because they felt they had a chance to make something of their season again.

    ND and UCLA. At least three people
    In the documentary, including Pete, said it explicitly. We? are not their daisy, though I hear they really really respect us?.
  • Mosster47
    Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

    Mosster47 said:

    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.

    This proves my point. USC wasn't good when you were and you were barely better. Oregon from 94 to 14 is the same story. They won one of their two BCS trips, but other than that it's apples to apples.
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,318 Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period. This is false. UW posted higher winning percentages than USC in both the 80's and the 90's, not to mention Top 10 finishes, etc.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.

    This proves my point. USC wasn't good when you were and you were barely better. Oregon from 94 to 14 is the same story. They won one of their two BCS trips, but other than that it's apples to apples.
    My point wasn't disagreement about USC being "down" for much of the 80's and 90's- i.e., our "best" era, but rather taking issue with your claim that USC was basically "just as good" as UW during that period. They were not. USC's winning percentage from 1980- 99 was .610 and UW's was .680, which is a pretty decent spread. UCLA was 2nd best to UW from 1980- 99 at .640.
  • PurpleThrobber
    PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 48,117 Standard Supporter
    Mosster47 said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    MisterEm said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

    @Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
    Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.

    Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.

    Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.

    When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.

    Mike fucking Riley.
    Pete lost to Mike fucking Price with a Heisman winner at QB.

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,739 Founders Club

    You guys have shit all over my shit poast.

    This is almost simple enough for krivashon, and I've splained it enough times for an educated Mexican or a drunk Indian ( hello @Swaye ) to get it: there is a % of husky fandoom that identifies, strongly, w/ being USC's favored bitch. Hence my tongue-in-twat "SC really respects us ..." line. That really is a thing.

    You dumb fucks have turned this into a "who's our rival" thread.

    Pay attention and fuck off!!!!!

    FREE PUB MOTHERFUCKERS!!!