Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

30 for 30 SC

creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262
edited July 2017 in College Football Forum
So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

1. UCLA; and
2. Notre Dame

No Washington?

Where's the respect?

Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.
«1

Comments

  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member Posts: 13,344
    washington has some great cameos in the 30 for 30s. Both 'U' episodes, Todd marinovich, I think they had something at the end of Trojan War for the 2009 USC upset being the end of the Carroll era.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262

    I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.

    Half is being generous; legions of UW fans identify with being SC's favorite runner up.
  • Neighbor2972Neighbor2972 Member Posts: 4,312
    I mean we've been irrelevant for over 15 years, its been awhile since we were more than an annoyance to them. Even now in making the playoff before them they still beat us. It will take a few years of meeting them in the P12 championship to really get the rivalry going again, especially with the fact that we don't even play them every year
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    Fuck the rivalries, natty or bust.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262

    Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?

    I thought that was just a joke on this site.

    Yes. It comes up in the always thought-provoking "history" convos.

    ND and UCLA. That's who they care about.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262

    I couldn't give a flying fuck about SC, i just want the Dawgs to be good. I don't understand y the half of HH is obsessed with SC.

    Respectable.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262
    Mosster47 said:

    SC and Washington are as much rivals as Oregon and Arizona.

    SC had what they considered a down period during UW's best period ever. SC did just as good as UW during that period.

    USC is in a class by itself out west. It's silly to suggest otherwise.

    Quit plagiarism my shit fucko!!

    Btw, that wasn't the point of my poast. You need to get in touch with @reedstrong. He can help you.
  • oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    Do people really think sc cares about Washington ?

    I thought that was just a joke on this site.

    They care about as much as the guy getting his cock sucked by a groupie whore cares about the whore.
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,366
    edited July 2017

    So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

    1. UCLA; and
    2. Notre Dame

    No Washington?

    Where's the respect?

    Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

    Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

    There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.

    Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?

    this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 26,972
    Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.

    It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami.
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited July 2017
    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

    @Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Nothing kills me more than when people shit on Pete.

    It was the most dominating dynasty since Miami.

    Terrible post is terrible
  • Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    edited July 2017
    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    MisterEm said:

    Mosster47 said:

    Pete won one BCS title.

    Saban has more than that in his couch cushions.

    Teams on a title run don't lose to the fucking Beavers like clockwork.

    The Rich Rod fellater, and, all around terrible football prognosticator, hath spoken (we have the screenshots).

    @Mosster47 has become the @HondoATVFS of the football bored.
    Am I wrong? A dynasty isn't dominating a shitty conference, USC does that in their sleep.

    Pete won one BCS Championship. Gene Chizick has the same. Pete demolished the Pac-10 when it wad fucking awful and beat up on the B1G Ten. He wasn't Miami or Nebraska.

    Pete is a great coach, but was anyone in the conference even remotely decent during his time? Cal had one decent year. Oregon had one decent year.

    When Bellotti hired Chip in 2007 Pete was fucking over. By the time he left he was the head of an 8 win program. Chip would have throat fucked him worse than Harbaugh already was if he stuck around.

    Mike fucking Riley.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262
    Baseman said:

    So over and over everyone says there are two games that matter at SC:

    1. UCLA; and
    2. Notre Dame

    No Washington?

    Where's the respect?

    Overall this thing pales in comparison to the first 30 for 30. You get a good look at the ghey manufactured hype machine at SC so that's good. Such faggotry in LA.

    Still, no mention of Washington. Must hurt given the speshul relation ship.

    There's also an unnecessary dig on my Kewgs. I won't soon forget that.

    Hi. Between 2001 and 2009 - the Carroll era- when did UW matter?

    this year they aren't scheduled. SC plays YOUR Kewgs @7:30 on a Friday night. SC on a Friday night means your team sucks. Hope this helps.
    You, too, must get in touch with @reedstrong; he'll explain.

    Thanks for the scheduling heads up.

  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,262
    Guysm guysm guysm, the OP wasn't focused on the most recent SC run. That's the topic of the 30/30 but the comment made therein about ND and UCLA, as well as UW's team crush on the Trojans, is an all time thing.

    Cheese and Rice ... You all need some @reedstrong time.
Sign In or Register to comment.