I've been a Beatles fanatic my whole life...and for years I've been saying Trump reminds me so much of John Lennon. Charismatic badass who loves attention, always has a chip on his shoulder, and isn't afraid of anything. Liberals hate that comparison, although I think John was actually much more conservative than we're led to believe.
Couple things,
Beatles suck. Sorry. They due.
The only thing that I think Trump and Lennon have in common is that none of those attributes applies to either of them. Charismatic? Bad ass? Are you serious?
And the secret conservatism of John Lennon? LOl. Please, due tell.
I've been a Beatles fanatic my whole life...and for years I've been saying Trump reminds me so much of John Lennon. Charismatic badass who loves attention, always has a chip on his shoulder, and isn't afraid of anything. Liberals hate that comparison, although I think John was actually much more conservative than we're led to believe.
Couple things,
Beatles suck. Sorry. They due.
The only thing that I think Trump and Lennon have in common is that none of those attributes applies to either of them. Charismatic? Bad ass? Are you serious?
And the secret conservatism of John Lennon? LOl. Please, due tell.
Dude, the White Album was actually supposed to be the Whites Only Album, but the PC police studio execs won that battle. Typical.
I've been a Beatles fanatic my whole life...and for years I've been saying Trump reminds me so much of John Lennon. Charismatic badass who loves attention, always has a chip on his shoulder, and isn't afraid of anything. Liberals hate that comparison, although I think John was actually much more conservative than we're led to believe.
Couple things,
Beatles suck. Sorry. They due.
The only thing that I think Trump and Lennon have in common is that none of those attributes applies to either of them. Charismatic? Bad ass? Are you serious?
And the secret conservatism of John Lennon? LOl. Please, due tell.
As soon as you're born they make you feel small By giving you no time instead of it all Till the pain is so big you feel nothing at all A working class hero is something to be A working class hero is something to be
They hurt you at home and they hit you at school They hate you if you're clever and they despise a fool Till you're so fucking crazy you can't follow their rules A working class hero is something to be A working class hero is something to be
When they've tortured and scared you for twenty-odd years Then they expect you to pick a career When you can't really function you're so full of fear A working class hero is something to be A working class hero is something to be
Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV And you think you're so clever and classless and free But you're still fucking peasants as far as I can see A working class hero is something to be A working class hero is something to be
There's room at the top they're telling you still But first you must learn how to smile as you kill If you want to be like the folks on the hill
A working class hero is something to be A working class hero is something to be If you want to be a hero well just follow me If you want to be a hero well just follow me
It's just he-said, she-said shit. So take it for what it's worth. Sure, he was big on protesting war and stuff, but foreign affairs aren't the only political issue. The Beatles certainly weren't a fan of Britain's progressive tax rates.
Remember, I said I "think" he is "more conservative" than we're led to believe. Basically I'm saying I don't think he was this ultra-liberal guy on every single issue.
And I would recommend watching John Lennon at press conferences, on stage, and during interviews if you want don't believe that he was a charismatic badass.
A 60's liberal is called conservative today. But he wasn't at the time
True. Lincoln was elected. He hated white trash more than anyone in American history. Destroyed the Sec. he's the classic 60s liberal who founded today's Conservative party.
It's just he-said, she-said shit. So take it for what it's worth. Sure, he was big on protesting war and stuff, but foreign affairs aren't the only political issue. The Beatles certainly weren't a fan of Britain's progressive tax rates. of course not. the liberal hyprocrisy: save the world with someone else's money.
Remember, I said I "think" he is "more conservative" than we're led to believe. Basically I'm saying I don't think he was this ultra-liberal guy on every single issue. Lennon was a self-loathing dirty hippy. Pressing here badly.
And I would recommend watching John Lennon at press conferences, on stage, and during interviews if you want don't believe that he was a charismatic badass. Recommend all you want. I've seen him plenty of times. He was neither clever nor insightful. I doubt he was even all that smart. The accident of history that was his fame is what has you duped here. Bad ass? He would have shit his pants before ever confronting anyone on his own. Come on man. He weighed 35 lbs. soaking wet. He was a pussy. Bad ass? He could have hit any ass in the free world and he chose a miserable, ugly, weirdo whore instead. The term "bad ass" is probably better used to describe Hillary Clinton than John fucking Lennon. You've been smoking bad shit today.
I've been a Beatles fanatic my whole life...and for years I've been saying Trump reminds me so much of John Lennon. Charismatic badass who loves attention, always has a chip on his shoulder, and isn't afraid of anything. Liberals hate that comparison, although I think John was actually much more conservative than we're led to believe.
It's just he-said, she-said shit. So take it for what it's worth. Sure, he was big on protesting war and stuff, but foreign affairs aren't the only political issue. The Beatles certainly weren't a fan of Britain's progressive tax rates. of course not. the liberal hyprocrisy: save the world with someone else's money.
Remember, I said I "think" he is "more conservative" than we're led to believe. Basically I'm saying I don't think he was this ultra-liberal guy on every single issue. Lennon was a self-loathing dirty hippy. Pressing here badly.
And I would recommend watching John Lennon at press conferences, on stage, and during interviews if you want don't believe that he was a charismatic badass. Recommend all you want. I've seen him plenty of times. He was neither clever nor insightful. I doubt he was even all that smart. The accident of history that was his fame is what has you duped here. Bad ass? He would have shit his pants before ever confronting anyone on his own. Come on man. He weighed 35 lbs. soaking wet. He was a pussy. Bad ass? He could have hit any ass in the free world and he chose a miserable, ugly, weirdo whore instead. The term "bad ass" is probably better used to describe Hillary Clinton than John fucking Lennon. You've been smoking bad shit today.
I find the number of Beatle haters on HH ironic, given the emphasis our? culture places on winning; they were, after all, the winningest rock group of all time. That said @creepycoug this is neither the time, nor the place to debate to debate whether they "sucked" musically speaking or not; there's probably a local convenience store or the like where we could meet up to discuss further.
I agree that Lennon's fame (and the others) was an accident of history- i.e., they were in the right place at the right time when their art from (rock music) was still in its infancy, and most of the good ideas had not yet been tried. None the less, he was creative as hell, and took advantage of the moment. Re: his charisma - I think he had quite a bit, although in a cheeky, provincial Brit sort of way. Those guys were funny as hell in A Hard Day's Night and they were in fact more popular than Jesus by 1966 when Lennon made said claim.
I don't think "pussy" is the right adjective for Lennon. Yeah, he was a wee little man, but he came from a working class background in a tough seaport town. And remember where they cut their teeth as a band in the clubs of the Reeperbahn of Hamburg.
It's just he-said, she-said shit. So take it for what it's worth. Sure, he was big on protesting war and stuff, but foreign affairs aren't the only political issue. The Beatles certainly weren't a fan of Britain's progressive tax rates. of course not. the liberal hyprocrisy: save the world with someone else's money.
Remember, I said I "think" he is "more conservative" than we're led to believe. Basically I'm saying I don't think he was this ultra-liberal guy on every single issue. Lennon was a self-loathing dirty hippy. Pressing here badly.
And I would recommend watching John Lennon at press conferences, on stage, and during interviews if you want don't believe that he was a charismatic badass. Recommend all you want. I've seen him plenty of times. He was neither clever nor insightful. I doubt he was even all that smart. The accident of history that was his fame is what has you duped here. Bad ass? He would have shit his pants before ever confronting anyone on his own. Come on man. He weighed 35 lbs. soaking wet. He was a pussy. Bad ass? He could have hit any ass in the free world and he chose a miserable, ugly, weirdo whore instead. The term "bad ass" is probably better used to describe Hillary Clinton than John fucking Lennon. You've been smoking bad shit today.
I find the number of Beatle haters on HH ironic, given the emphasis our? culture places on winning; they were, after all, the winningest rock group of all time. That said @creepycoug this is neither the time, nor the place to debate to debate whether they "sucked" musically speaking or not; there's probably a local convenience store or the like where we could meet up to discuss further.
I agree that Lennon's fame (and the others) was an accident of history- i.e., they were in the right place at the right time when their art from (rock music) was still in its infancy, and most of the good ideas had not yet been tried. None the less, he was creative as hell, and took advantage of the moment. Re: his charisma - I think he had quite a bit, although in a cheeky, provincial Brit sort of way. Those guys were funny as hell in A Hard Day's Night and they were in fact more popular than Jesus by 1966 when Lennon made said claim.
I don't think "pussy" is the right adjective for Lennon. Yeah, he was a wee little man, but he came from a working class background in a tough seaport town. And remember where they cut their teeth as a band in the clubs of the Reeperbahn of Hamburg.
Lennon was 5'11", had a large enough frame to play guitar well, and was the largest of The Beatles. Not a huge guy, but certainly not a small guy either. He was known to pick fights when he was younger, and when he was with The Beatles, he beat the shit out of some guy for calling him a queer. I wouldn't have wanted to fuck with him...
Anyway, my point is...John Lennon could beat up anyone's (2) dad(s), but was likely no match for Superman or Goku, and that's why I like Donald Trump.
He did play a sissy little Rickenbacker that had a 3/4 scale fret bored. Any of you guitar players here that may have picked up a Rick 325 will know what I'm talking about.
It's just he-said, she-said shit. So take it for what it's worth. Sure, he was big on protesting war and stuff, but foreign affairs aren't the only political issue. The Beatles certainly weren't a fan of Britain's progressive tax rates. of course not. the liberal hyprocrisy: save the world with someone else's money.
Remember, I said I "think" he is "more conservative" than we're led to believe. Basically I'm saying I don't think he was this ultra-liberal guy on every single issue. Lennon was a self-loathing dirty hippy. Pressing here badly.
And I would recommend watching John Lennon at press conferences, on stage, and during interviews if you want don't believe that he was a charismatic badass. Recommend all you want. I've seen him plenty of times. He was neither clever nor insightful. I doubt he was even all that smart. The accident of history that was his fame is what has you duped here. Bad ass? He would have shit his pants before ever confronting anyone on his own. Come on man. He weighed 35 lbs. soaking wet. He was a pussy. Bad ass? He could have hit any ass in the free world and he chose a miserable, ugly, weirdo whore instead. The term "bad ass" is probably better used to describe Hillary Clinton than John fucking Lennon. You've been smoking bad shit today.
I find the number of Beatle haters on HH ironic, given the emphasis our? culture places on winning; they were, after all, the winningest rock group of all time. That said @creepycoug this is neither the time, nor the place to debate to debate whether they "sucked" musically speaking or not; there's probably a local convenience store or the like where we could meet up to discuss further.
I agree that Lennon's fame (and the others) was an accident of history- i.e., they were in the right place at the right time when their art from (rock music) was still in its infancy, and most of the good ideas had not yet been tried. None the less, he was creative as hell, and took advantage of the moment. Re: his charisma - I think he had quite a bit, although in a cheeky, provincial Brit sort of way. Those guys were funny as hell in A Hard Day's Night and they were in fact more popular than Jesus by 1966 when Lennon made said claim.
I don't think "pussy" is the right adjective for Lennon. Yeah, he was a wee little man, but he came from a working class background in a tough seaport town. And remember where they cut their teeth as a band in the clubs of the Reeperbahn of Hamburg.
Comments
Beatles suck. Sorry. They due.
The only thing that I think Trump and Lennon have in common is that none of those attributes applies to either of them. Charismatic? Bad ass? Are you serious?
And the secret conservatism of John Lennon? LOl. Please, due tell.
As soon as you're born they make you feel small
By giving you no time instead of it all
Till the pain is so big you feel nothing at all
A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be
They hurt you at home and they hit you at school
They hate you if you're clever and they despise a fool
Till you're so fucking crazy you can't follow their rules
A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be
When they've tortured and scared you for twenty-odd years
Then they expect you to pick a career
When you can't really function you're so full of fear
A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be
Keep you doped with religion and sex and TV
And you think you're so clever and classless and free
But you're still fucking peasants as far as I can see
A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be
There's room at the top they're telling you still
But first you must learn how to smile as you kill
If you want to be like the folks on the hill
A working class hero is something to be
A working class hero is something to be
If you want to be a hero well just follow me
If you want to be a hero well just follow me
It's just he-said, she-said shit. So take it for what it's worth. Sure, he was big on protesting war and stuff, but foreign affairs aren't the only political issue. The Beatles certainly weren't a fan of Britain's progressive tax rates.
Remember, I said I "think" he is "more conservative" than we're led to believe. Basically I'm saying I don't think he was this ultra-liberal guy on every single issue.
And I would recommend watching John Lennon at press conferences, on stage, and during interviews if you want don't believe that he was a charismatic badass.
I don't know which is funnier, him, or the assholes that believe in him.
I agree that Lennon's fame (and the others) was an accident of history- i.e., they were in the right place at the right time when their art from (rock music) was still in its infancy, and most of the good ideas had not yet been tried. None the less, he was creative as hell, and took advantage of the moment. Re: his charisma - I think he had quite a bit, although in a cheeky, provincial Brit sort of way. Those guys were funny as hell in A Hard Day's Night and they were in fact more popular than Jesus by 1966 when Lennon made said claim.
I don't think "pussy" is the right adjective for Lennon. Yeah, he was a wee little man, but he came from a working class background in a tough seaport town. And remember where they cut their teeth as a band in the clubs of the Reeperbahn of Hamburg.
Anyway, my point is...John Lennon could beat up anyone's (2) dad(s), but was likely no match for Superman or Goku, and that's why I like Donald Trump.