Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
XSantaclausFS
Comments
-
If I was an old man I'd be even more pissed because I probably wouldn't live to see UW football return.
-
This is the year to realize that the other guys are getting better also, and thus, UW must get better than better. It's way past time to understand that the football culture at UW must be to step on the accelerator and quickly get past Oregon, Stanford, ASU, USC, and UCLA....... enough so that we kick Pac-11 butt every year on a regular basis. Nothing less is worth our while.He_Needs_More_Time said:
To those who bring up 0-12 and how Sark has brought in better players, changed culture, blah blah blah I always bring up how Sark with Ty's players in year 2 went 7-6. Then went 7-6 again, 7-6 again and it's looking very likely he's going to win 7 if not 6 games this year.DugtheDoog said:Posted: Today 1:40 PM
Re: Is Five years enough time...
Considering Sark inherited an 0 - 12 team and the cupboard was bare I don't think 5 years is enough. Consider how few HWSRN recruits were drafted in the last 5 years.
Sark instilled a winning culture, recruited better players, changed the culture, and now has a new stadium and better team facilities to entice recruits to sign with us. We are getting closer to competing with a Rose Bowl and he deserves more time and the opportunity to get us there.
So if he's improving our roster it's not translating to wins at all.
Also Ty gave him Locker, Polk, Kearse, Ta'amu, Aguilar, Goodwin, Kelemente, Teo-Nesheim, Butler, and Price who will have all played in the NFL or in Price case will(Jeff Tuel is in the NFL so Price will make it).
-
Tailgater said:
Yeah, RIP Don James. He did a hell of a job but he never had to deal with a ranked Oregon State and Arizona schools that were serious about football. But seriously though, these doogman idiots don't understand a very simple concept. More or less, you play the same teams in conference every year and you have to win your conference to ultimately be where you want to be. Which means if the teams around us are getting 50% better and we're getting 10% better, we're effectively getting worse. Oregon and Stanford are top notch, UCLA is getting there, ASU and UofA have pretty good coaches now, Oregon State will be above average most years, and USC will always be USC. You can't take baby steps while everyone around you is running.He_Needs_More_Time said:
This is the year to realize that the other guys are getting better also, and thus, UW must get better than better. It's way past time to understand that the football culture at UW must be to step on the accelerator and quickly get past Oregon, Stanford, ASU, USC, and UCLA....... enough so that we kick Pac-11 butt every year on a regular basis. Nothing less is worth our while.DugtheDoog said:Posted: Today 1:40 PM
Re: Is Five years enough time...
I seriously think a lot of these idiots are masochists who in some sick way enjoy being plunger raped 3-5x/year. Otherwise, why put up with this shit? I'm starting to think most of our boosters are fucking pussies who put up with this shit too, like Bleenor, if they get to feel like they're "tight" with the head coach. Maybe I'm wrong, but there just doesn't seem to be any fucking pressure to win at this damn school. Lambo got fired for one 6-6 season! Now 2-9, 5-7, 4-9 doesn't get you fired and 5-7, 7-6, 7-6, 7-6 practically gets you the keys to the city. -
Remain.Mad_Son said:HWSRN?
-
Fucking this. I'm almost 41 and seriously don't know if I'll see another UW Rose Bowl in my life.Gladstone said:If I was an old man I'd be even more pissed because I probably wouldn't live to see UW football return.
-
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Fucking this. I'm almost 41 and seriously don't know if I'll see another UW Rose Bowl in my life.Gladstone said:If I was an old man I'd be even more pissed because I probably wouldn't live to see UW football return.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoMmbUmKN0E
