Rutgers' view of Washington

DerekJohnson

nj.com/rutgersfootball/index.ssf/2017/06/why_rutgers_season-opening_foe_washington_could_be.html

HuskyHalfBrain

Chris Fatters is your source?

Swaye

Rutgers. LOL. Fuck Rutgers.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

I'm disappointed they didn't reach out to Indian Chief @swaye & Spirit Horse.

AIRWOLF

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

chuck

So fucking sick of reading about Browning. UW could, and should, beat every team on the schedule with the backup QB. There should be two 1000 yard rushers, a good OL and a couple of big play guys (McClutchens, maybe Ahmed or the Columbian) putting points on the board.

UW probably couldn't beat USC this year with the backup. That's the only game I'd excuse a loss

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

What did he have to say about the defensive ends?

puppylove_sugarsteel

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

You are correct wolf

MelloDawg

Sounds like they talked about Browning being the best player on the field (enough said there), a change in defense from Year 3 to Year 4 and speed, speed, speed.

3/5 not bad. Missing boys who are ready to rumble and TOP

dnc

MelloDawg said:

Sounds like they talked about Browning being the best player on the field (enough said there), a change in defense from Year 3 to Year 4 and speed, speed, speed.

3/5 not bad. Missing boys who are ready to rumble and TOP

You are correct wolf

Pitchfork51

chuck said:

So fucking sick of reading about Browning. UW could, and should, beat every team on the schedule with the backup QB. There should be two 1000 yard rushers, a good OL and a couple of big play guys (McClutchens, maybe Ahmed or the Columbian) putting points on the board.

UW probably couldn't beat USC this year with the backup. That's the only game I'd excuse a loss

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

What did he have to say about the defensive ends?

God damn. The dooging is strong.

chuck

Pitchfork51 said:

chuck said:

So fucking sick of reading about Browning. UW could, and should, beat every team on the schedule with the backup QB. There should be two 1000 yard rushers, a good OL and a couple of big play guys (McClutchens, maybe Ahmed or the Columbian) putting points on the board.

UW probably couldn't beat USC this year with the backup. That's the only game I'd excuse a loss

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

What did he have to say about the defensive ends?

God damn. The dooging is strong.

Yeah I suppose. The Pac 12 is pretty weak and the only other good team in the league isn't on the schedule.

Also note that I said "could" and "should" not "will". I think the pieces are there to run the conference slate with a shit QB. I doubt it would happen that way though. I'm not a Browning fan but I'd expect conference loss or two if he was hurt for a long stretch of games. I have no faith at all in the offensive game planning.

Pitchfork51

chuck said:

Pitchfork51 said:

chuck said:

So fucking sick of reading about Browning. UW could, and should, beat every team on the schedule with the backup QB. There should be two 1000 yard rushers, a good OL and a couple of big play guys (McClutchens, maybe Ahmed or the Columbian) putting points on the board.

UW probably couldn't beat USC this year with the backup. That's the only game I'd excuse a loss

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

What did he have to say about the defensive ends?

God damn. The dooging is strong.

Yeah I suppose. The Pac 12 is pretty weak and the only other good team in the league isn't on the schedule.

Also note that I said "could" and "should" not "will". I think the pieces are there to run the conference slate with a shit QB. I doubt it would happen that way though. I'm not a Browning fan but I'd expect conference loss or two if he was hurt for a long stretch of games. I have no faith at all in the offensive game planning.

Pumpy says all games will be a loss.

TTJ

Illiteracy. Sad!

RaceBannon

Pitchfork51 said:

chuck said:

So fucking sick of reading about Browning. UW could, and should, beat every team on the schedule with the backup QB. There should be two 1000 yard rushers, a good OL and a couple of big play guys (McClutchens, maybe Ahmed or the Columbian) putting points on the board.

UW probably couldn't beat USC this year with the backup. That's the only game I'd excuse a loss

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

What did he have to say about the defensive ends?

God damn. The dooging is strong.

You are correct wolf

ThomasFremont

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

AIRWOLF said:

HuskyHalfBrain said:

Chris Fatters is your source?

I like that he said Rapp would move from playing the Nickel to Safety to fill in for the loss of Baker. In reality, their roles were exactly the opposite most of last season when they were on the field at the same time. In other words, when they played together, Rapp was playing FS most of the time and Baker was playing Nickel.

Somebody whose whole job is to watch Husky football ought to know that.

You are correct wolf