Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump under investigation
Comments
-
It doesn't even deserve another quoting. Mosster you are a fag
-
I quoted this.Mosster47 said:
Is this why he only has a little over 40 appointed executive positions so far when most presidents have well over 100 by this same time in their tenure?Sledog said:Trump can fire all appointees. Often done in large number by new presidents. Since Comey has screwed the pooch in multiple instances it's all the easier.
Here is a very real problem with being way way way behind the ball on this. The previous executive appointees were from the other party. Their #2 guys are all permanent employees that the President can't just fire and run out. Those #2 guys are and have been "acting" as the head honchos. So, when the President says an agency is going to get cut, can't hire, etc. without having someone appointed to the head of it tge acting guy just ignores it, which I can assure you is happening.
Trump, no matter how badly you want his balls on your chin or not is really really really bad at government. There is no debate on this term from either side. Reagan at least had a clue before he got in the White House. -
If you really stop and think about it, every President is and should be, under investigation at all times, by everyone. Every four years, we render a political verdict.
-
Totally agree.doogie said:If you really stop and think about it, every President is and should be, under investigation at all times, by everyone. Every four years, we render a political verdict.
-
Mosster47 said:
Is this why he only has a little over 40 appointed executive positions so far when most presidents have well over 100 by this same time in their tenure?Sledog said:Trump can fire all appointees. Often done in large number by new presidents. Since Comey has screwed the pooch in multiple instances it's all the easier.
Here is a very real problem with being way way way behind the ball on this. The previous executive appointees were from the other party. Their #2 guys are all permanent employees that the President can't just fire and run out. Those #2 guys are and have been "acting" as the head honchos. So, when the President says an agency is going to get cut, can't hire, etc. without having someone appointed to the head of it tge acting guy just ignores it, which I can assure you is happening.
I would have tucked into a stall of the only bathroom open on the north side with a Ruth then, placed her hands on the wall and dumped a doozie on the small of her back anyday. She can look good one day and damn awful the next. But fact is, a rear propped up nice and extended, back arched, can suffice on a good percentage of women. Must have meat on the bone though. A boney chick looks like a stick-figure propped in said position. -
Mosster47 said:
Is this why he only has a little over 40 appointed executive positions so far when most presidents have well over 100 by this same time in their tenure?Sledog said:Trump can fire all appointees. Often done in large number by new presidents. Since Comey has screwed the pooch in multiple instances it's all the easier.
Here is a very real problem with being way way way behind the ball on this. The previous executive appointees were from the other party. Their #2 guys are all permanent employees that the President can't just fire and run out. Those #2 guys are and have been "acting" as the head honchos. So, when the President says an agency is going to get cut, can't hire, etc. without having someone appointed to the head of it tge acting guy just ignores it, which I can assure you is happening.
Trump, no matter how badly you want his balls on your chin or not is really really really bad at government. There is no debate on this term from either side. Reagan at least had a clue before he got in the White House.</</b>blockquote>
You obviously were a pip squeak through Bill Clintons first 2 years in office and don't remember that everyone said the same thing about him. -
Are you saying Trump should welcome this kind of examination?doogie said:If you really stop and think about it, every President is and should be, under investigation at all times, by everyone. Every four years, we render a political verdict.
