Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Oregon wins because same coaches for 20 years- Dick BairdFS

Ummm They are on their third head coach since 2008 you dumb senile drunk old fuck!

Coaching stability is not why we suck.

Not firing a loser coach when the red flags were obvious is why we fucking suck!
«1

Comments

  • Coaching stability is the most fucktarded argument and anyone who still believes it needs to die in a fucking fire!
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Someone should have told Stanford that when they decided to fire Walt Harris and hire Jim Harbaugh.
  • Someone should have told Stanford that when they decided to fire Walt Harris and hire Jim Harbaugh.

    Alabama apparently fucked up by firing Mike Shula and hiring Saban.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,065 Standard Supporter
    edited October 2013
    Every good program had their down years and bad hires. We just like to prolong our misery longer here. It's a doog tradition.

    After 3 years you can tell if progress is being made. If it is not you can then and move on to the next.

    When you find that guy you pay him so he never leaves.

    T's and p's.
  • Every good program had their down years and bad hires. We just like to prolong our misery linger here. It's a doog tradition.

    After 3 years you can tell if progress is being made. If it is not you can then and move on to the next.

    When you find that guy you pay him so he never leaves.

    T's and p's.

    Every school fucks up with their hires time to time. It happens hard to get too upset. Problem is at Washington we fucking wait a year or two too long to fire the sack of shit coach.
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,121 Founders Club
    This deserved it's own thread.
  • PurpleJ said:

    This deserved it's own thread.

    Why I posted it. I didn't want this fucktarded statement buried not to mention it's completely fucking false.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,663 Founders Club

    Coaching stability is the most fucktarded argument and anyone who still believes it needs to die in a fucking fire!

    When Neuheisel was fired in 6/'03, Gilbertson took over, then he was canned in 11/'04, then Tytanic ok....I got it...but now..
  • Coaching stability is the most fucktarded argument and anyone who still believes it needs to die in a fucking fire!

    When Neuheisel was fired in 6/'03, Gilbertson took over, then he was canned in 11/'04, then Tytanic ok....I got it...but now..
    Oklahoma in the 90's had like 5 coaches in 7 years then won a national title in Stoops second year.

    Fuck coaching stability! Fuck any mother fucker who quotes coaching stability right in the fucking ass!

  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    The only halfway legitimate argument to stability is that it can ruin a recruiting class. But as someone pointed out this is the perfect year to do so because the class will only be about 15 guys. Either way, door. ass. out.
  • The only halfway legitimate argument to stability is that it can ruin a recruiting class. But as someone pointed out this is the perfect year to do so because the class will only be about 15 guys. Either way, door. ass. out.

    In 2007 Ty was having a "kickass" class for class of 2008 so they brought him back. That class was solid but was not worth 0-12 that is for sure.

    Also if you fire Sark quickly and hire a coach he has some time to get some guys in this class. Not every fucktard is going to choose FREE PUB!!! over recruiting his own job.
  • TheKobeStopperTheKobeStopper Member Posts: 5,959

    The only halfway legitimate argument to stability is that it can ruin a recruiting class. But as someone pointed out this is the perfect year to do so because the class will only be about 15 guys. Either way, door. ass. out.

    That halfway legitimate argument was used to prop up Tys final season.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited October 2013
    At this point...

    Sark. D.A.O.. > Any future recruiting advantage.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,065 Standard Supporter
    Nevermind oregons talent development and execution It's their stability that's the answer.

  • Nevermind oregons talent development and execution It's their stability that's the answer.

    They've never had a top 10 recruiting class either yet every year they live in the top 5. They develop their players better than everyone else.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,065 Standard Supporter
    I think it's more execution than anything.
  • DeLarryDeLarry Member Posts: 230
    Yeah, but who cares if a coaching change ruins a recruiting class?

    Keeping a loser coach ruins five recruiting classes.
  • AtomicDawgAtomicDawg Member Posts: 7,065 Standard Supporter
    The only reason to ruin a recruiting class is free pub if your coach is coaching an all star game in Hawaii or as an asst in the rosé bowl. Get some perspective.
  • BiggusDickusBiggusDickus Member Posts: 553
    DM.c are enablers in all this. They help to create groupthink among the KrisVashonFS and Section14aFS segment of the fanbase that bleats whatever they are told to bleat. It then becomes more difficult for the general public to put pressure on the coaching staff to succeed and win.

    Sark should have been fired at the airport last night. A program that gives a shit will fire him at the end of the season for anything less than nine wins. Sadly, Ektard is right and UW will probably keep him around with as little as six. Next year, with young, inexperienced skill players and STILL NO LINE PLAY, UW will win less than 4 games. Maybe Sark gets fired then. But the perception of the UW as mediocre or worse persists, and we get than much further away from being a player in the conference or the nation as a whole.
Sign In or Register to comment.