Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

NEXT STEP FOR CFB BREAKTHROUGH TEAMS

BaldwinIVBaldwinIV Member Posts: 797
First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
http://www.sportsonearth.com/article/229083966/college-football-breakout-teams-2016-next-step
Washington

2016 breakout: The Huskies began last season ranked 14th in the AP poll despite coming off a 7-6 season and having not been ranked better than 15th in any AP top 25 since 2002. There was faith in Chris Petersen, in his third season with a more experienced roster, and the Huskies lived up to the hype and more. They won the Pac-12 for the first time since 2000, going 12-2 with a playoff bid. They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams, with an outstanding season and a superb sophomore effort from QB Jake Browning before losing to Alabama in the Peach Bowl.

Why they'll be better: Browning actually injured his shoulder in November and played through pain late in the season. He underwent surgery in January and should hopefully be back to the player we saw much of the 2016 season. The offense returns plenty of experience, including RB Myles Gaskin, OT Trey Adams and WR Dante Pettis, and there's a lot to like about the defensive front, especially with LB Azeem Victor returning from a season-ending injury.

Why they'll be worse: Browning loses his best offensive weapon in speedster John Ross, whose departure also deprives the Huskies of a standout kick returner. The losses may be felt more on defense, where the secondary loses stars Budda Baker, Sidney Jones and Kevin King, with all-conference DT Elijah Qualls also gone.

2017 stock: Slightly down. Washington likely won't be the Pac-12 favorite, but it will be the Pac-12 North favorite. With Browning back, the offense will be excellent, and there is time to rebuild the defensive backfield thanks to a helpful schedule. Washington doesn't have to play Darnold and USC in the regular season; it has a laughable nonconference schedule featuring Rutgers, Montana and Fresno State; and it doesn't face Josh Rosen until Oct. 28 and Luke Falk until Nov. 25. Stock is "slightly down" only because repeating as a playoff team will be difficult, but the Huskies should be in a similar ballpark.
«1

Comments

  • Options
    BaldwinIVBaldwinIV Member Posts: 797
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    What is trollish about posting an article like this?
  • Options
    uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    I'll never tire of remembering this:

    "They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams"

  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    uzi said:

    uzi said:

    I'll never tire of remembering this:

    "They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams"

    Agree. It was really impressive the way Washington State rolled those two teams last year.
    Why don't you take your tampon out and suck a bag of dicks.
    Doogs hate facts.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    AZDuck said:

    BaldwinIV said:

    uzi said:

    I'll never tire of remembering this:

    "They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams"

    Agree. It was really impressive the way Washington State rolled those two teams last year.
    What team do you cheer for? Do you enjoy college football? Why are you here?

    31,000 posts holy fucking shit
    I cheer for Washington.

    That article was fucking stupid.

    Hope this helps.
    Notice he didn't answer if he enjoys college football.
    SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC SEC
  • Options
    ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Push up the middle and heat from the edge.
  • Options
    Mosster47Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment

    uzi said:

    I'll never tire of remembering this:

    "They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams"

    Agree. It was really impressive the way Washington State rolled those two teams last year.
    Agreed. UW wasn't a bad team last year, but they played two good teams and were pushed around by both. They were Oregon in 2009.

    UW will be an 8 or 9 win team this year, but I expect them to be right back in with the big boys in 2018.

    Last year was an awful Pac-12, nothing more.
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Mosster47 said:

    uzi said:

    I'll never tire of remembering this:

    "They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams"

    Agree. It was really impressive the way Washington State rolled those two teams last year.
    Agreed. UW wasn't a bad team last year, but they played two good teams and were pushed around by both. They were Oregon in 2009.

    UW will be an 8 or 9 win team this year, but I expect them to be right back in with the big boys in 2018.

    Last year was an awful Pac-12, nothing more.
    Mosster struggling. Every thread.
  • Options
    SoutherndawgSoutherndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,236
    5 Awesomes First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment
    Founders Club
    Mosster47 said:

    uzi said:

    I'll never tire of remembering this:

    "They broke the Stanford/Oregon stranglehold on the conference by crushing both teams"

    Agree. It was really impressive the way Washington State rolled those two teams last year.
    Agreed. UW wasn't a bad team last year, but they played two good teams and were pushed around by both. They were Oregon in 2009.

    UW will be an 8 or 9 win team this year, but I expect them to be right back in with the big boys in 2018.

    Last year was an awful Pac-12, nothing more.
    Partially right. 70 - 21 aside, the offense was Oregon any year soft, no argument. The PAC 12 was awful as well, but that's been the case for a very very long time which is why it's been such a long time since a "real" conference champion has emerged. Gotta go back to Carroll at USC for that event. But 8 or 9 wins this year? The conference still sucks and UW's schedule is again Oregon any year soft, they'll most likely win more regular season games than that and it will mean fuck all ... again.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary

    Can we stop pretending like Stanford was a shit team last year just because they got rolled by WSU? They were definitely a flawed team but they weren't this fucking clown shoe shitshow people make them out to be. UW took a gigantic shit on their face and let them know they weren't winning the north, then they tucked their tail between their legs and got embarrassed by WSU in a game where they didn't give a shit about.

    If you get rolled by WSU, you're a shit team.

    Simple fact.
    Case closed.
    End of discussion.
  • Options
    GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,481
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Standard Supporter

    Can we stop pretending like Stanford was a shit team last year just because they got rolled by WSU? They were definitely a flawed team but they weren't this fucking clown shoe shitshow people make them out to be. UW took a gigantic shit on their face and let them know they weren't winning the north, then they tucked their tail between their legs and got embarrassed by WSU in a game where they didn't give a shit about.

    If you get rolled by Stanford, you're a shit team.

    Simple fact.
    Case closed.
    End of discussion.
    image
Sign In or Register to comment.