Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Everyone just forgets about Kawhi
Comments
-
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane. -
Kawhi has improved tremendously ... but at the same time, I had a very high opinion of him going into his NBA career. You could tell he was a winner in college and would put in the work necessary to become a solid NBA player.CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane.
Like I said, I'd be willing to say that Murray will get there ... but to say he's anywhere close to where Leonard was coming out of college and into the NBA ... just not the fact. -
Murray's also the same age as Leonard was a sophomore in college. By that token he's a far better three point shooter than Leonard was at the same stage.Tequilla said:
Kawhi has improved tremendously ... but at the same time, I had a very high opinion of him going into his NBA career. You could tell he was a winner in college and would put in the work necessary to become a solid NBA player.CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane.
Like I said, I'd be willing to say that Murray will get there ... but to say he's anywhere close to where Leonard was coming out of college and into the NBA ... just not the fact.
The idea that rookie Leonard was a night and day better shooter than Murray is false.
Murray will probably never be the defender that rookie Leonard was but most won't. -
I didn't even argue that. All I said was that Kawhi didn't have a jumper either out of college to show that it is something Dejounte can improve.Tequilla said:
Kawhi has improved tremendously ... but at the same time, I had a very high opinion of him going into his NBA career. You could tell he was a winner in college and would put in the work necessary to become a solid NBA player.CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane.
Like I said, I'd be willing to say that Murray will get there ... but to say he's anywhere close to where Leonard was coming out of college and into the NBA ... just not the fact.
All I said was that in a couple seasons they are going to be a very good back court, especially defensively with all their length. You put both of them on a flatbed for comparisons sake.
-
I would be cautious about Murray's jumper. Some guys come into the league and improve their shooting, many don't. It's not always a hard work thing. Dwyane Wade is a good example. Never figured out how to shoot consistently, always been a hard worker. Even if he is a bitch.
That said, as long Pop is there and he does work hard, he should be good. Parker was never a threat from 3 but the Spurs made their offense work around that. -
By what measure is Murray a better shooter than Leonard was?dnc said:
Murray's also the same age as Leonard was a sophomore in college. By that token he's a far better three point shooter than Leonard was at the same stage.Tequilla said:
Kawhi has improved tremendously ... but at the same time, I had a very high opinion of him going into his NBA career. You could tell he was a winner in college and would put in the work necessary to become a solid NBA player.CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But43 he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane.
Like I said, I'd be willing to say that Murray will get there ... but to say he's anywhere close to where Leonard was coming out of college and into the NBA ... just not the fact.
The idea that rookie Leonard was a night and day better shooter than Murray is false.
Murray will probably never be the defender that rookie Leonard was but most won't.
He played 322 minutes as a rookie and shot 43% from the field ... are you basing this on the 22 3's he shot? How about the 44.6% he shot in the D-League this season? Or are you looking at the 41.6% from the field he shot in college ... largely because his jumper was broken and his shot selection was suspect (as it is for most young kids).
At least compared to a guy like Tony Wroten you can see that Murray actually looks like he cares about getting better ... it's why I'd bet on the fact that he'd make it.
But thinking that Murray's going to be anywhere close to Leonard is smoking some serious shit ... so very unlikely that Murray's going to be one of the Top 3-5 players in the league. -
What I said going back in this thread:CuntWaffle said:
I didn't even argue that. All I said was that Kawhi didn't have a jumper either out of college to show that it is something Dejounte can improve.Tequilla said:
Kawhi has improved tremendously ... but at the same time, I had a very high opinion of him going into his NBA career. You could tell he was a winner in college and would put in the work necessary to become a solid NBA player.CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane.
Like I said, I'd be willing to say that Murray will get there ... but to say he's anywhere close to where Leonard was coming out of college and into the NBA ... just not the fact.
All I said was that in a couple seasons they are going to be a very good back court, especially defensively with all their length. You put both of them on a flatbed for comparisons sake.
1) I like that Murray isn't afraid of the moment ...
2) He needs to improve his jumper ...
3) Right now he gets a lot of his baskets through rotations and the opposition being ok with him shooting ...
4) Disagreeing the idea that Leonard/Murray had the same broken jumper issues in college and/or coming into the league ...
5) Saying that Murray needs to get to a point where his jumper is at least consistent in the mid-range game to serve a similar role as Tony Parker (while also saying that I think that that was attainable) ...
You'd think that I said that Murray's a bum and will never make it in the league with all the disagreement that both you and @dnc are throwing out there ... all I've said is that comparing him to Leonard and putting them in the same sentence is foolishly stupid. It'd be hard for me to be more complementary of Murray at this point. Yet I'm the doog ... go figure. -
Wade always had a decent mid-range (back to about the international 3 point line) but definitely has never been a 3 point shooter. He was always more of a slasher and wanting to get inside the 10-15 range before shooting.allpurpleallgold said:I would be cautious about Murray's jumper. Some guys come into the league and improve their shooting, many don't. It's not always a hard work thing. Dwyane Wade is a good example. Never figured out how to shoot consistently, always been a hard worker. Even if he is a bitch.
That said, as long Pop is there and he does work hard, he should be good. Parker was never a threat from 3 but the Spurs made their offense work around that.
The key is getting to the point where that mid-range shot from 17-19 feet becomes automatic like a free throw in the course of play ... if anybody can make that consistently in the 60-70% range it opens up so much more for that player offensively when it comes to getting to the basket ... particularly if your game is to slash and get into the paint.
But you are definitely right that some guys never become solid shooters no matter how much work they put into it. For guys that have spent the balance of their lives being able to get to the basket at will learning to change their game to be able to shoot jump shots is a massive culture shock. -
If Pop openly says they got a good one in Murray, he's going to be good. He wouldn't say that about somebody he wasn't very high on.
Murray will get better and is a future core player for the Spurs. -
Holy shit no one has said anything close to that.Tequilla said:
By what measure is Murray a better shooter than Leonard was?dnc said:
Murray's also the same age as Leonard was a sophomore in college. By that token he's a far better three point shooter than Leonard was at the same stage.Tequilla said:
Kawhi has improved tremendously ... but at the same time, I had a very high opinion of him going into his NBA career. You could tell he was a winner in college and would put in the work necessary to become a solid NBA player.CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi had about a 3% better FG% in college but about 4% worse 3 than Dejounte. That is not "night and day difference".Tequilla said:
Night and day difference ...CuntWaffle said:
Kawhi couldn't shoot when he got to the league either.Tequilla said:
I'm not sure what to think about this ...CuntWaffle said:Dejounte and Kawhi in 2 years is going to be ridiculous.
I love the fact that Murray isn't scared of the moment ... that tells me that he's going to have a fighting chance in the league ...
But43 he needs to be able to shoot the basketball ... most of his baskets right now are coming from being on the weakside rotations and teams being ok with him shooting it.
If I'm betting I think Murray will make it ... he could be the next version of Parker for them. But he's got to be able to at minimum get to the point where that mid-range jumper becomes close to automatic for him or teams are just going to give him anything he wants outside of the lane.
Like I said, I'd be willing to say that Murray will get there ... but to say he's anywhere close to where Leonard was coming out of college and into the NBA ... just not the fact.
The idea that rookie Leonard was a night and day better shooter than Murray is false.
Murray will probably never be the defender that rookie Leonard was but most won't.
He played 322 minutes as a rookie and shot 43% from the field ... are you basing this on the 22 3's he shot? How about the 44.6% he shot in the D-League this season? Or are you looking at the 41.6% from the field he shot in college ... largely because his jumper was broken and his shot selection was suspect (as it is for most young kids).
At least compared to a guy like Tony Wroten you can see that Murray actually looks like he cares about getting better ... it's why I'd bet on the fact that he'd make it.
But thinking that Murray's going to be anywhere close to Leonard is smoking some serious shit ... so very unlikely that Murray's going to be one of the Top 3-5 players in the league.
Cunt said Kawhi was a shit shooter like Murray when he entered the league. He was right. That's the only thing anyone has said comparing Kawhi to Murray. Nobody thinks Murray's going to be a top 5 player in the league. Where did you possibly even get that shit?
