Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

TSiO Episode #31: CINCO DE MAYO II

17891113

Comments

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    edited May 2017
    Penis Stew
    Time 120 minutes Serves 4
    Ingredients

    1 pound of penis, ram's or bull's
    3 tbls. oil
    1 large chopped onion
    2 garlic cloves, peeled and chopped
    1 tsp coriander seeds, crushed
    1 tsp salt
    freshly ground black pepper
    How to make it

    Scald the penis, then drain and clean (doesn't say how you clean a penis. Not sure a guy would know since this penis is, well . . . never mind).
    Place the penis in a saucepan, cover with cold water, and bring to a boil.
    Remove any scum, then simmer for 10 minutes.
    Drain and slice.
    Heat the oil in a large skillet.
    Add the onion, garlic, and coriander and fry until the onion is golden.
    Add the penis slices and fry on both sides for a few minutes.
    Stir in the remaining ingredients with a good grinding of pepper, add enough water to cover, and bring to a boil.
    Lower the heat, cover, and simmer for about 2 hours, or until tender.
    Add a little water from time to time if necessary to prevent burning.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited May 2017
    Tequilla said:

    Thanks for the comments @dnc

    Regarding pod length, this may sound crazy but there are a lot of people that really like our pod length as they do a lot of listening on flights, traffic, etc.

    But it is definitely a fair point and something we always struggle with as we normally aim for 90-120 minute pods ... one thing we won't do though is stop a pod because we are X amount of time into it ... IMO by far the best aspect of this pod was the 20 or so minutes leading into Haiku's ...

    I'm still holding out hope that someday we will get to 100 downloads ... Dennis and Pepsi think I'm crazy

    I wasn't suggesting stopping your conversation since you're x minutes in, just that you could splice it down after the fact.

    Not sure if serious, but I don't think 100 downloads is out of reach at all.

    I will say that if you're shooting for growth the fact your hardcore listeners might not be scared off by the long pods shouldn't factor in. To someone looking at you on itunes who has never listened I imagine that length could scare them off.

    Regardless, I'll leave it alone from there, its your pod and you guys do good work.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Thanks for listening @dnc. To point #2, the funny thing is that our longest podcasts are, without question, our most downloaded podcasts, this one has a chance to maybe get into the 20 download range! Trust me, we talk a LOT about length of pods, but people listen to those long ones. In season we will for sure try to be shorter, and it also helps save @Dennis_DeYoung from hours of editing when we can keep it under 90 minutes.

    Point 6, I love Taylor Rapp and I just want him all to myself. Purely selfish, fully admit it. You are right.

    Point 10, Colorado is a good call for that shit, but we need to see more proof in their pudding. Stanford is interesting because they have recruited so well, but they just don't seem to be developing guys all that well, honestly.

    Point 12, I take donations and bribes.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223
    Definitely not saying that you were ... but it's part of the reason we run long at times besides having 2 blowhards like Dennis and I not helping (the pod would be 5 minutes of dead air if Pepsi was in charge ...

  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    dnc said:

    Tequilla said:

    Thanks for the comments @dnc

    Regarding pod length, this may sound crazy but there are a lot of people that really like our pod length as they do a lot of listening on flights, traffic, etc.

    But it is definitely a fair point and something we always struggle with as we normally aim for 90-120 minute pods ... one thing we won't do though is stop a pod because we are X amount of time into it ... IMO by far the best aspect of this pod was the 20 or so minutes leading into Haiku's ...

    I'm still holding out hope that someday we will get to 100 downloads ... Dennis and Pepsi think I'm crazy

    I wasn't suggesting stopping your conversation since you're x minutes in, just that you could splice it down after the fact.

    Not sure if serious, but I don't think 100 downloads is out of reach at all.

    I will say that if you're shooting for growth the fact your hardcore listeners might not be scared off by the long pods shouldn't factor in. To someone looking at you on itunes who has never listened I imagine that length could scare them off.

    Regardless, I'll leave it alone from there, its your pod and you guys do good work.
    No, seriously, feel free to give feedback anytime. Everything you are bringing up, the three of us have discussed, so it's not like you are insulting us or anything.

    For me, our signing day pod and the cinco pod will always be two of the longest just because we have so much to talk about for signing day, and then cinco lines up with post spring and the shit fest that is tequilla and dennis drinking.

    The problem with breaking up the pods is editing for dennis (more tim) and storage issues on the backend (that's what she said).
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    Thanks for listening @dnc. To point #2, the funny thing is that our longest podcasts are, without question, our most downloaded podcasts, this one has a chance to maybe get into the 20 download range! Trust me, we talk a LOT about length of pods, but people listen to those long ones. In season we will for sure try to be shorter, and it also helps save @Dennis_DeYoung from hours of editing when we can keep it under 90 minutes.

    Point 6, I love Taylor Rapp and I just want him all to myself. Purely selfish, fully admit it. You are right.

    Point 10, Colorado is a good call for that shit, but we need to see more proof in their pudding. Stanford is interesting because they have recruited so well, but they just don't seem to be developing guys all that well, honestly.

    Point 12, I take donations and bribes.

    What makes you say this other than this year's draft? Here are their last four draft classes.

    2014 - 6 players drafted (one second round, one fourth, two fifths, one sixth and a seventh)
    2015 - 6 players drafted (one first, a second, three thirds and a fifth)
    2016 - 5 players drafted (one first, one third, one fourth, one fifth and a sixth)
    2017 - 2 players drafted (two first)

    Four year total - 19 players drafted (average of 4.75 per year).
    Four first round/day picks, six second day picks (two second rounders, four third rounders), 9 third day picks (two fourths, four fifth, two six, one seventh).

    That's not BAMA level productivity but I'd be surprised if there's more than 10 or 15 programs that have done better in that span.

    I don't think there's evidence they're underachieving.
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsi
    CokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    dnc said:

    Thanks for listening @dnc. To point #2, the funny thing is that our longest podcasts are, without question, our most downloaded podcasts, this one has a chance to maybe get into the 20 download range! Trust me, we talk a LOT about length of pods, but people listen to those long ones. In season we will for sure try to be shorter, and it also helps save @Dennis_DeYoung from hours of editing when we can keep it under 90 minutes.

    Point 6, I love Taylor Rapp and I just want him all to myself. Purely selfish, fully admit it. You are right.

    Point 10, Colorado is a good call for that shit, but we need to see more proof in their pudding. Stanford is interesting because they have recruited so well, but they just don't seem to be developing guys all that well, honestly.

    Point 12, I take donations and bribes.

    What makes you say this other than this year's draft? Here are their last four draft classes.

    2014 - 6 players drafted (one second round, one fourth, two fifths, one sixth and a seventh)
    2015 - 6 players drafted (one first, a second, three thirds and a fifth)
    2016 - 5 players drafted (one first, one third, one fourth, one fifth and a sixth)
    2017 - 2 players drafted (two first)

    Four year total - 19 players drafted (average of 4.75 per year).
    Four first round/day picks, six second day picks (two second rounders, four third rounders), 9 third day picks (two fourths, four fifth, two six, one seventh).

    That's not BAMA level productivity but I'd be surprised if there's more than 10 or 15 programs that have done better in that span.

    I don't think there's evidence they're underachieving.
    Fuck you and your stats, I'm just going to go gently sob in the corner, because you wrecked me. I hadn't looked at their numbers like that. I just felt like they didn't hit in the draft like that. Well done, sir. And fuck you.