Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Joseph Ngata, 5* 2019 WR, Folsom, CA (WE FUCKED THE POOCH)

1353638404149

Comments

  • NEsnake12NEsnake12 Member Posts: 3,792
    Meek said:

    fuck you two take this offline.

    It’s been a while since anyone’s met up at 7-11 on Aurora in the U-District...
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,602 Founders Club
    I've never drunkenly thumbed through walls of text this fast to catch up.

    BALLZ STOp
    TEQ STOp
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,602 Founders Club


    This makes me miss Dubya
  • WoofWoof Member Posts: 770
    Hey guys. Did I miss anything lately? Took a trip to the Carolinas this weekend so I haven't been around much.
  • dtddtd Member Posts: 5,038 Standard Supporter
    Woof said:

    Hey guys. Did I miss anything lately? Took a trip to the Carolinas this weekend so I haven't been around much.

    WE won the offseason! BOOYAKASHA!
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    Stumbling into thread and seeing the text wall arguments like

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiE5mE0ZorA
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,979 Swaye's Wigwam

    What everyone missed this last week due to the Teq v. Ballz/Roof retard fest, was that the pain from losing Ngata isn't because we'll? go get JAGs to fill the class at WR. Nor does it matter that his spot can be used to grab another guy on the lines. It also doesn't matter that we? can miss on him because the last two classes were really solid at WR and we? can take the blow.

    All it takes to understand why losing Ngata is crippling is to imagine the last two UW seasons (with runs to both the Playoffs and the Fiesta Bowel) with a 6'4" 216 pound N'Keal Harry on the team.

    We? got Byron Murphy but were unable to lock down his best friend Harry. While Ross and Dante were lighting it up in 2016, Harry would have been getting valuable playing time as a Freshman as a Day 1 physical force. In 2017, Harry would have made an elite pairing with Dante that would have allowed Fuller/Pounds/Baccellia to figure out who is the #3 WR. Going into 2018, instead of zero fucking clue who is going to emerge at WR, you'd have a grown ass man Harry as a JR who is he best WR in the league and can figure out who's going to jump into that #2 and #3 spot between Jones/Fuller/etc.

    Ngata is that kind of dominant WR. The pain from losing Ngata comes from the lack of an absolute physical dominance. A 3 year starter then guaranteed early NFL entrant. Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Osborne should all be good WR. But it will be critical to get Ngata to flip back to UW so that those other WR can be Elite #2 and #3 WR's that pair with the physical presence of Ngata.

    If you can't see that, there's Ngata fucking thing I can do to help you.

    TLDR Ngata is the type of receiver and depth we need to compete against big time programs with NFL caliber corners. We had a real shot at him and blew it by soft selling when we should have been closing.
  • BallzBallz Member Posts: 4,735

    What everyone missed this last week due to the Teq v. Ballz/Roof retard fest, was that the pain from losing Ngata isn't because we'll? go get JAGs to fill the class at WR. Nor does it matter that his spot can be used to grab another guy on the lines. It also doesn't matter that we? can miss on him because the last two classes were really solid at WR and we? can take the blow.

    All it takes to understand why losing Ngata is crippling is to imagine the last two UW seasons (with runs to both the Playoffs and the Fiesta Bowel) with a 6'4" 216 pound N'Keal Harry on the team.

    We? got Byron Murphy but were unable to lock down his best friend Harry. While Ross and Dante were lighting it up in 2016, Harry would have been getting valuable playing time as a Freshman as a Day 1 physical force. In 2017, Harry would have made an elite pairing with Dante that would have allowed Fuller/Pounds/Baccellia to figure out who is the #3 WR. Going into 2018, instead of zero fucking clue who is going to emerge at WR, you'd have a grown ass man Harry as a JR who is he best WR in the league and can figure out who's going to jump into that #2 and #3 spot between Jones/Fuller/etc.

    Ngata is that kind of dominant WR. The pain from losing Ngata comes from the lack of an absolute physical dominance. A 3 year starter then guaranteed early NFL entrant. Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Osborne should all be good WR. But it will be critical to get Ngata to flip back to UW so that those other WR can be Elite #2 and #3 WR's that pair with the physical presence of Ngata.

    If you can't see that, there's Ngata fucking thing I can do to help you.

    Ty Jones is 6'4 215 with 4.5 speed and a 40 inch vert. Who's to say he won't become our version of N'keal Harry?

    Yes, getting N'keal Harry would have been huge because of the the JAGs we've had to deal with at WR the past couple years outside of Ross and Pettis. But, the comparison to Joe Ngata potentially coming to UW now and Harry back then is apples to oranges. Yes, Ngata is a freak but if he comes to UW the JAGs will be on their way out the door and he'll be competing for playing time against other stud WRs who will have a leg up on him in terms of knowledge of the system and experience. Ngata would not have the early impact on the team that Harry would have because the WR depth and overall talent when Ngata would arrive will be far better than it was back then.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931

    What everyone missed this last week due to the Teq v. Ballz/Roof retard fest, was that the pain from losing Ngata isn't because we'll? go get JAGs to fill the class at WR. Nor does it matter that his spot can be used to grab another guy on the lines. It also doesn't matter that we? can miss on him because the last two classes were really solid at WR and we? can take the blow.

    All it takes to understand why losing Ngata is crippling is to imagine the last two UW seasons (with runs to both the Playoffs and the Fiesta Bowel) with a 6'4" 216 pound N'Keal Harry on the team.

    We? got Byron Murphy but were unable to lock down his best friend Harry. While Ross and Dante were lighting it up in 2016, Harry would have been getting valuable playing time as a Freshman as a Day 1 physical force. In 2017, Harry would have made an elite pairing with Dante that would have allowed Fuller/Pounds/Baccellia to figure out who is the #3 WR. Going into 2018, instead of zero fucking clue who is going to emerge at WR, you'd have a grown ass man Harry as a JR who is he best WR in the league and can figure out who's going to jump into that #2 and #3 spot between Jones/Fuller/etc.

    Ngata is that kind of dominant WR. The pain from losing Ngata comes from the lack of an absolute physical dominance. A 3 year starter then guaranteed early NFL entrant. Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Osborne should all be good WR. But it will be critical to get Ngata to flip back to UW so that those other WR can be Elite #2 and #3 WR's that pair with the physical presence of Ngata.

    If you can't see that, there's Ngata fucking thing I can do to help you.

    Ty Jones is 6'4 215 with 4.5 speed and a 40 inch vert. Who's to say he won't become our version of N'keal Harry?

    Yes, getting N'keal Harry would have been huge because of the the JAGs we've had to deal with at WR the past couple years outside of Ross and Pettis. But, the comparison to Joe Ngata potentially coming to UW now and Harry back then is apples to oranges. Yes, Ngata is a freak but if he comes to UW the JAGs will be on their way out the door and he'll be competing for playing time against other stud WRs who will have a leg up on him in terms of knowledge of the system and experience. Ngata would not have the early impact on the team that Harry would have because the WR depth and overall talent when Ngata would arrive will be far better than it was back then.
    FUCK YOU DOOG
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,931
    @DoogCourics

    I agree 100% and it definitely got lost in the wall of back/forth

    Ngata is elite and special ...

    Take Harry and Petrie last year as a great example. Pettis is a competent #1 but an ELITE #2. This is where understanding concepts like spotting guys in the right spots and trickle down effects really matters.

    Fast forward to next year with an OL prospect like Hatchett. If he comes in and plays a T spot for us that’s great - total confidence that he can do that. If we’re able to have 3 (or more) elite T on the roster that increases the potential of moving one (or more) inside to G. It’s not a 1:1 just that simple of a switch but the point being that it increases the ability to not only get our best players on the field, but to put them in positions where in relation to the players lining up across from them they have a competitive advantage. It’s such an important concept to embrace and understand.
  • uziuzi Member Posts: 1,298
    edited July 2018
    Doogles said:

    What everyone missed this last week due to the Teq v. Ballz/Roof retard fest, was that the pain from losing Ngata isn't because we'll? go get JAGs to fill the class at WR. Nor does it matter that his spot can be used to grab another guy on the lines. It also doesn't matter that we? can miss on him because the last two classes were really solid at WR and we? can take the blow.

    All it takes to understand why losing Ngata is crippling is to imagine the last two UW seasons (with runs to both the Playoffs and the Fiesta Bowel) with a 6'4" 216 pound N'Keal Harry on the team.

    We? got Byron Murphy but were unable to lock down his best friend Harry. While Ross and Dante were lighting it up in 2016, Harry would have been getting valuable playing time as a Freshman as a Day 1 physical force. In 2017, Harry would have made an elite pairing with Dante that would have allowed Fuller/Pounds/Baccellia to figure out who is the #3 WR. Going into 2018, instead of zero fucking clue who is going to emerge at WR, you'd have a grown ass man Harry as a JR who is he best WR in the league and can figure out who's going to jump into that #2 and #3 spot between Jones/Fuller/etc.

    Ngata is that kind of dominant WR. The pain from losing Ngata comes from the lack of an absolute physical dominance. A 3 year starter then guaranteed early NFL entrant. Jones, Bynum, Cook, Spiker, Osborne should all be good WR. But it will be critical to get Ngata to flip back to UW so that those other WR can be Elite #2 and #3 WR's that pair with the physical presence of Ngata.

    If you can't see that, there's Ngata fucking thing I can do to help you.

    The problem with this analysis is you assume Harry would understand Petersens play book enough to get actual PT.

    Once you Doogs admit Ty Jones' frosh year was a bust you'll understand. It's one of the frustrating things of this regime.

    As much as we make fun of Sark for just going out and "letting it rip", Petersens offense could use a little more of that element.
    Didn't our new OC just spend a year learning from Sark?
  • BasemanBaseman Member Posts: 12,367
    Maybe Pete and Bush have decided we? need fewer receivers going forward and are changing to the Power I ( three backs) or Wishbone.

    Double tight ends. Three backs. 1 receiver.

    50 rushes; 15 passing attempts per game. I’m great with this.
  • jhfstyle24jhfstyle24 Member Posts: 3,255
    Tequilla said:

    @DoogCourics

    I agree 100% and it definitely got lost in the wall of back/forth

    Ngata is elite and special ...

    Take Harry and Petrie last year as a great example. Pettis is a competent #1 but an ELITE #2. This is where understanding concepts like spotting guys in the right spots and trickle down effects really matters.

    Fast forward to next year with an OL prospect like Hatchett. If he comes in and plays a T spot for us that’s great - total confidence that he can do that. If we’re able to have 3 (or more) elite T on the roster that increases the potential of moving one (or more) inside to G. It’s not a 1:1 just that simple of a switch but the point being that it increases the ability to not only get our best players on the field, but to put them in positions where in relation to the players lining up across from them they have a competitive advantage. It’s such an important concept to embrace and understand.

    TL;DR
    If you got a guy who plays G at an elite level and T at a high level, you want an elite tackle for maximum performance

    Cannot wait until #conciseTequila shows up
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,979 Swaye's Wigwam
    Squirt said:

    I have been reflecting on Joseph Ngata's recruitment. An important question springs to mind, and I'm really hoping that @Tequilla and BallzDeep can weigh in:

    Was John Ross drafted in the top 10 or top 15 of the first round?

    I'm hearing the answer is abundance.
  • NurpleNurple Member Posts: 686
    Seems to be a pinfall anywhere match between teq and ruthballz.
  • DooglesDoogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,602 Founders Club
    Squirt said:

    I have been reflecting on Joseph Ngata's recruitment. An important question springs to mind, and I'm really hoping that @Tequilla and BallzDeep can weigh in:

    Was John Ross drafted in the top 10 or top 15 of the first round?

    Squirt said:

    I have been reflecting on Joseph Ngata's recruitment. An important question springs to mind, and I'm really hoping that @Tequilla and BallzDeep can weigh in:

    Was John Ross drafted in the top 10 or top 15 of the first round?

    One could argue Pettis was drafted above his projection. SF is a great place for him
Sign In or Register to comment.