Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dawgman subscriber content
They really try to justify $10.95/mo but the lack of creativity in the journalism is pathetic.
This is the extent of their content over the course of the year:
Pre-Spring position review
Mid-Spring awards
Post-Spring position review
Pre-Fall position review
Mid-Fall awards
Post-Fall position review
Mid-Season awards
Post-season position review
Post-season awards
Fatters basically just regurgitates the same talking points 9x a year and the Doogs will eat it up and rave about how they love this amazing content. if only Jude wasn't such a lazy fuck he could have put these guys out of business by now.
1 ·
Comments
The fucker knows he could do boring-ass positional recaps periodically and probably dwindle the Doogman base because his content is free.
But he says, "fuck it" and is just waiting for another round of layoffs at the Times so he can get let go, claim unemployment, then he can get paid to eat Taco Bell and play Call of Duty all fucking day and night.
Shit was like a days meal and 2.95.
No wonder I lost 30 lbs in college.
"Can we PLEASE just act like adults? I don't understand why people have to be so antagonistic to each other. If you don't like the takes of another poster, ignore them. If they come after you, don't take it personally and ignore them. This is the last warning. If we keep having issues, I'm going to start banning people left and right for even minor infractions. I HATE banning people. I believe the board should be a free exchange of ideas. But I'm fed up. Everybody is on the same team here. And I shouldn't even have to say anything. Stay on topic, be insightful, be cordial, or you're gone. Period."
Fag mod II jumps in with his two cents, not to be out done by fag mod I
"Let me be very clear about this:
If people can't help themselves from antagonizing, constantly being negative just for the sake of negativity, or taking personal shots at other posters, Fag Mod I and I will just start banning them. No warnings. No exceptions. This crap has to stop."
And what started this? One poster said to another "Incredible insight."
http://hardcorehusky.com/forums/#/discussion/comment/622617
I like the idea, but it's too specific.
Ekland has this recent thing where he asks 2017 commits opponents for a scouting report. There is no way he actually talks to players and coaches about Cook, Haener, Bynum, etc.
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/3664/message-from-a-soon-to-be-former-hardcore-poster/p1
Make 5-6 changes and you'r golden.