Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Steve Bannon Is No Longer on the NSC

13»

Comments

  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,236
    doogie said:

    Here is the only news you need to know.

    Trump won, fags are butt hurt.

    doogie calling anyone else a fag is comical. Especially with Trump's sack parked on his chin like it is.
  • Intersectional_DawgIntersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524
    Gee, that really sounds like the kind of guy you want in the room when you're talking about nuclear proliferation.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,148 Founders Club

    Doogles said:

    So are the libs happy or outraged?

    Trump could wipe out cancer and the s.j.w. fags would find fault.
    Well? We're waiting!
    for what?
  • Intersectional_DawgIntersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524

    Doogles said:

    So are the libs happy or outraged?

    Trump could wipe out cancer and the s.j.w. fags would find fault.
    Well? We're waiting!
    for what?
    Your bullshit hypothetical.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,789 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
    Stay at the table. You can win your money back
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
    Stay at the table. You can win your money back
    They're welcome to prove me wrong.

    Maybe they'll find a way to pass major legislation.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,789 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
    Stay at the table. You can win your money back
    They're welcome to prove me wrong again.

    Maybe they'll find a way to pass major legislation.
    Can't win the primary

    Can't debate

    Can't win the general

    Won't be inaugurated

    Now we are on can't govern a mere 2 months in.

    I like Trump in this one
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
    Stay at the table. You can win your money back
    They're welcome to prove me wrong again.

    Maybe they'll find a way to pass major legislation.
    Can't win the primary

    Can't debate

    Can't win the general

    Won't be inaugurated

    Now we are on can't govern a mere 2 months in.

    I like Trump in this one
    Trump loves to campaign. He never got enough credit for that.

    He hasn't yet shown that he likes to govern. We're still in LIPO territory, but his performance to date has been Sark in 2009, at best.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,789 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
    Stay at the table. You can win your money back
    They're welcome to prove me wrong again.

    Maybe they'll find a way to pass major legislation.
    Can't win the primary

    Can't debate

    Can't win the general

    Won't be inaugurated

    Now we are on can't govern a mere 2 months in.

    I like Trump in this one
    Trump loves to campaign. He never got enough credit for that.

    He hasn't yet shown that he likes to govern. We're still in LIPO territory, but his performance to date has been Sark in 2009, at best.
    Just so I am not totally disagreeable I'll go along with LIPO but I do disagree on liking to govern. He's got in there and got his hands dirty. All it is deal making. He loves it. Whether he is any good at it at this level is a question.

  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,789 Founders Club

    doogie said:

    If only you were a little brighter, you might comprehend why Brannon and Trump are in the White House against most odds while you're unemployed.

    They had better electoral strategy than their opponent.

    That doesn't mean they have a coherent strategy for running the country.
    Stay at the table. You can win your money back
    They're welcome to prove me wrong again.

    Maybe they'll find a way to pass major legislation.
    Can't win the primary

    Can't debate

    Can't win the general

    Won't be inaugurated

    Now we are on can't govern a mere 2 months in.

    I like Trump in this one
    Trump loves to campaign. He never got enough credit for that.

    He hasn't yet shown that he likes to govern. We're still in LIPO territory, but his performance to date has been Sark in 2009, at best.
    image
    image
  • Intersectional_DawgIntersectional_Dawg Member Posts: 524
    edited April 2017
    Let's go to the tape:

    Trump pledged to do the following in his first 100 days:

    Appoint judges "who will uphold the Constitution" and "defend the Second Amendment"
    Pending
    Construct a wall on the southern U.S. border and limit illegal immigration "to give unemployed Americans an opportunity to fill good-paying jobs"
    Way down the road, if it happens at all.
    Re-assess trade agreements with other nations and "crack down" on companies that send jobs overseas
    Wilbur Ross doesn't want to bin NAFTA, so we're waiting to see what they do at the edges.
    Repeal and replace the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly called the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare)
    Nope.
    Remove federal restrictions on energy production
    Probably his biggest "achievement" if that's what you call putting down an advance on future smog and pollution
    Push for an amendment to the United States Constitution imposing term limits on Congress
    Nope.
    Eliminate gun-free zones
    Nope.
    Formulate a rule on regulations "that for every one new regulation, two old regulations must be eliminated"
    Sorta.
    Instruct the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to 'develop a comprehensive plan to protect America's vital infrastructure from cyberattacks, and all other form of attacks.'
    If it exists it hasn't been released.
    Label China a 'currency manipulator'
    Nope.

    Let's also add CJTF-OIR bogging down in Mosul (like everyone knowledgable said it would); the botched rollout of the travel ban and subsequent rollback on green cards; and putting us closer to war with North Korea than at any other time in decades.

    100 days are up on the 29th, so he'd better get cracking!
Sign In or Register to comment.