Never have so many posts been made that have said nothing.
You want to take the gloves off Race? You want to get down in a pissing match? Let’s do it. Let’s roll.
I’m getting completely fed up with your hate, negativity, and throwing people under the bus.
Quite frankly Race, I’m very, VERY happy that I don’t know you. I’m quite happy that I don’t lead what appears to be such a pathetic life that is faced with looking for the negativity in every situation. You need to go find something to smile at. Last I checked, it’s summertime. The weather in Seattle seems to be pretty damn good right now – why don’t you go check that out.
You are pretty damn wrong about things. You may think that the amount of time that you keep spewing your views that that you’ve now heard it enough times that you are right. Doesn’t make you right.
You talk about 12-47 like that happened out of the blue sky. I’ve never seen you once suggest that the process of the downfall of this program began well before Emmert arrived.
You want facts? You want truth? Here’s your truth.
Emmert came to the UW prior to the GLORIOUS 1-10 season under Gilby. The year before that (2003) Gilby managed to do enough to get us to 6-6, but that included the debacle at Cal where we gave up 700 yards (or thereabouts). It was an indifferent team that pretty much was at best mediocre. We lost 5 of our last 8, including the blowout to Cal, the blowout to UCLA, and a home loss to NEVADA. Yep, the program was heading in the right direction.
The 2002 season under Slick was another sterling season example that is most remembered for the “Northwest Championship.” That was great. But it hid the fact that going into the “Northwest Championship” we were a 4-5 football team that was pretty much a joke at 1-4 in the conference. In both 2002 and 2003, we finished the season with a 4-4 conference record.
These weren’t good football teams. The trend was heading downhill.
Emmert comes on board and immediately gets sadled with the Gilby 1-10 debacle.
Prior to Emmert coming on board, Babs jumps ship after a decade of mis-management, including allowing the stadium to begin the erosion process.
Throughout 2003, we’re faced with Slick leaving and the subsequent lawsuit(s), Dr. Feelgood, and a whole mess with the softball program and Teresa Wilson.
Now keep in mind the following: ALL THIS HAPPENED BEFORE EMMERT WAS ANYWHERE NEAR BEING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON.
Things were not in great shape. I think just about everybody knew that.
A search committee is formed to replace Babs. The BOR, upper campus, and the big donor supporters of the school are sick of the egg showing up on their face. They are sick of the country club that Babs ran and the loose way she ran the department – particularly in light of what went on with Slick. They wanted someone prim, proper, and who they could count on would not sully the University name. ENTER TODD TURNER.
Now, this pretty much gets you up to the point where Emmert was hired. Did he have to sign off on the hiring of Turner? Most likely. But whatever.
At this point, Emmert isn’t responsible for the on-field performance of the football program. There is a coach in place. It’s not Emmert’s job to oversee the football program or any other program in the athletic department. That job belongs to Todd Turner. It’s Emmert’s job to monitor the job performance of Todd Turner.
So 1-10 happens. Gilby is canned by Turner (rightfully so). Yes, the program went 1-10. But the actions of those charged with overseeing the program were correct. Turner fired the coach for poor performance. If I’m in Emmert’s shoes, I can’t complain.
Coaching search takes place and Turner has his heart set on Tyrone Willingham. It’s Turner’s hire. It’s not Emmert’s hire. Surely Emmert had to sign off on the hire. That’s fine. You want to throw some blame on him for not having the foresight to negate the hire. That’s fine. But the hire isn’t Emmert’s responsibility. It’s Turner’s responsibility. It’s Emmert’s responsibility to hold Turner accountable for the hire (which he did 3 years later when it was obvious that Tyrone wasn’t the answer).
So Tyrone goes 2-9 the first year after a 1-10 year. Not great. Warning signs start going off, particularly with some poor performance to close games. But it’s the first year of the regime and really hard to get too critical.
The next year the program goes 5-7 and has 2 significant events. The first significant event is the loss of the QB to injury. I think many could argue that without the loss of Isaiah that year, we go 6-6. The second event that was significant was the “suddenly senior” day and the unexplicable loss to Stanford with the most emotionless football team anybody had ever seen. Again, there’s not enough there to fire Tyrone at that point. There are warning signs. There is ground to pretty much tell Tyrone that the following year is an action year where something needs to happen. He’s on a short leash at this point in my opinion.
The following year we lose games in ways that are unexplainable. Blow a huge loss to Arizona – a game we should have never lost. The most ridiculous ending to an Apple Cup I’ve ever seen where a guy was open by 20 yards coming out of a timeout. Blowing a pair of 21 point leads to Hawai’i. It was pretty obvious at this point that things weren’t working. Coaching change was in order. Perhaps an AD change was also in order. The coaching change was blocked and complicated. The AD’s head fell – and rightfully so due to some other issues that he had and such a terrible hire of a head coach.
Prior to the decision to fire Tyrone after 2007, it’s really hard to argue with ANYTHING that Emmert had done with respect to the football program.
I will say that bringing Tyrone back for 2008 was a disasterous mistake. It should have never happened. You want to throw 0-12 on Emmert – I’m all for it. I think if you caught Emmert in a reflective, truthful moment, he would tell you in hindsight that he should have made the move and that it wasn’t worth the carnage of 0-12.
Throw Emmert under the bus for 2008. That’s his responsibility. 2004-2007? Not so much. By all means, please, please tell me where he has responsibility for 2004 and 2007 other than the fact that he’s the University President. Please tell me what specific actions that he did to undermine the program. You aren’t going to find them – they aren’t there.
Your criticism of Emmert is ridiculous. Your criticism of Woodward is just downright comical.
Where has Woodward screwed this program? He has only been responsible for this program in the summer of 2008 in a full-time role. Are you going to hold him to the fire for being the interim AD for the first half of 2008? How is he responsible for anything from 2004-2007 when he wasn’t even involved with the Athletic Department? Talk about conspiracy theories. This may be one of the greatest conspiracy theories I’ve ever seen.
I don’t like losing. I don’t like what I’ve seen the last 5 years. It’s made me sick to my stomach many times over. But unlike you, I can at least take a step back and realize that the genesis of this problem began well before Mark Emmert became President of the University of Washington.
If I spent my time being a “mindless Race Bannon minion,” then I’d be convinced that the only logical explanation for our failures have been Mark Emmert and Scott Woodward.
Quite frankly, that opinion is one of the most idiotic insanely stupid opinions that I’ve ever seen in my life.
I don’t defend the “wrong targets.” There is blame to be thrown Emmert’s way. I readily acknowledge that. But it isn’t his full blame. Babs deserves blame. Gerberding deserves blame. McCormick deserves some blame. Slick deserves some blame. Gilby deserves some blame. Turner deserves some blame. Tyrone deserves some blame. Of the names I’ve listed, only 3 of those names have any timeline that extends into any portion of Emmert’s tenure. That’s less than half of those names.
Quite frankly Race, you are a world class donkey. When I hear people bitch and moan about the people in the State of Washington – you are a crystal example of why people bitch about the State of Washington. When I hear people that bitch about the fans of the University of Washington and what their complaints are, you represent what those complaints are.
In my opinion, you are not good for the University of Washington. You aren’t helping the program. You aren’t helping the University. You are entirely self-serving and a pompous, egotistical jerk.
You are barking up the wrong tree if you are going after me. I’m not naive enough to shove my head so far up my arse to ignore what I am seeing. I don’t think that there is anybody that knows me that would say that I wouldn’t call a spade a spade.
All that paying for and attending games longer than I’ve been alive has done for you is given you a perceived ability to go be a bitter old man. Congrats on that.
Thanks for showing those of us in a younger generation how not to act in 20-30 years when we are in your shoes.
Unataka kupata kinga mbali Mbio? Unataka kupata chini katika pissing mechi? Hebu kufanya hivyo. Hebu unaendelea.
Nina kupata kabisa kulishwa juu na chuki yako, negativity, na kutupa watu chini ya basi.
Kusema ukweli kabisa Endesha, mimi ni sana, sana furaha kwamba mimi sijui wewe. Nina furaha kabisa kwamba mimi si kusababisha kile kinachoonekana kuwa kama maisha ya kusikitisha kwamba ni wanakabiliwa na kutafuta negativity katika kila hali. Unahitaji kwenda kupata kitu kutabasamu katika. Ya mwisho I checked, ni Summertime. hali ya hewa katika Seattle inaonekana kuwa pretty damn nzuri sasa hivi - kwa nini wewe kwenda kuangalia kwamba nje.
Wewe ni pretty damn mbaya juu ya mambo. Unaweza kufikiri kwamba kiasi cha muda kwamba mwendelee spewing maoni yako kuwa hiyo umefanya sasa kusikia mara ya kutosha kuwa wewe ni sahihi. Hafanyi wewe haki.
Kuongea juu 12-47 kama hicho kilichotokea nje ya anga ya bluu. Sijawahi kuona wewe mara moja zinaonyesha kwamba mchakato wa kuanguka kwa mpango huu ulianza vizuri kabla Emmert aliwasili.
Unataka ukweli? Unataka kweli? Hapa ni kweli yako.
Emmert alikuja UW kabla ya UTUKUFU 1-10 msimu chini ya Gilby. mwaka kabla ya hapo (2003) Gilby imeweza kufanya kutosha kupata sisi 6-6, lakini hiyo ni pamoja na debacle katika Cal ambapo sisi aliacha 700 yadi (au thereabouts). Ilikuwa tofauti timu ambayo pretty much alikuwa katika bora mediocre. Tulipoteza 5 ya mwisho 8 zetu, ikiwa ni pamoja na blowout kwa Cal, blowout na UCLA, na hasara nyumbani kwa NEVADA. Ndio, mpango alikuwa anaelekea katika mwelekeo sahihi.
Msimu 2002 chini Slick mara nyingine Sterling msimu mfano kwamba ni zaidi alikumbuka kwa ajili ya "Northwest michuano." Hiyo ilikuwa kubwa. Lakini kujificha ukweli kwamba kwenda katika "Northwest michuano" tulikuwa 4-5 soka timu ambayo alikuwa pretty much utani katika 1-4 katika mkutano huo. Katika wawili mwaka 2002 na 2003, sisi kumaliza msimu na rekodi 4-4 mkutano huo.
Hizi hazikuwa timu za kandanda nzuri. mwenendo mara kichwa kuteremka.
Emmert kuja kwenye bodi na mara anapata sadled kwa Gilby 1-10 debacle.
Kabla ya Emmert kuja kwenye bodi, Babs anaruka meli baada ya miongo ya menejimenti mbovu, ikiwa ni pamoja na kuruhusu uwanja wa kuanza mchakato mmomonyoko.
Katika mwaka wa 2003, sisi ni wanakabiliwa na kuondoka Slick na kesi ya baadaye (s), Dk Feelgood, na fujo nzima na mpango Softball na Teresa Wilson.
Sasa kumbuka yafuatayo: Haya yote yalitokea KABLA Emmert WAS mahali popote karibu KUWA RAIS WA Chuo Kikuu cha Washington.
Mambo hayakuwa katika sura kuu. Nadhani tu kuhusu kila mtu alijua kuwa.
Kamati ya utafutaji inaundwa kuchukua nafasi Babs. Bor, juu ya chuo, na wafuasi kubwa ya wafadhili wa shule ni mgonjwa wa yai kuonekana kwenye uso wao. Wao ni wagonjwa wa nchi klabu Babs mbio na njia huru alikimbilia idara - hasa katika mwanga wa nini aliendelea na Slick. Walitaka mtu prim, sahihi, na ni nani wangeweza kuhesabu hakutaka Sully jina Chuo Kikuu. ENTER TODD TURNER.
Sasa, hii pretty much anapata hadi mahali ambapo Emmert aliajiriwa. Je, alikuwa na kutia saini mbali juu ya ajira ya Turner? Uwezekano mkubwa. Lakini chochote.
Katika hatua hii, Emmert haina dhamana kwa uwanjani utendaji wa mpango wa soka. Kuna kocha katika nafasi. Siyo kazi Emmert ya kusimamia mpango wa mpira au mpango mwingine wowote katika idara ya riadha. kazi ambayo ni ya Todd Turner. Ni kazi Emmert ya kufuatilia utendaji kazi wa Todd Turner.
Hivyo 1-10 kinatokea. Gilby ni makopo na Turner (haki hivyo). Ndiyo, mpango akaenda 1-10. Lakini matendo ya wale kushtakiwa kwa kusimamia mpango walikuwa sahihi. Turner fired kocha kwa ajili ya utendaji maskini. Kama mimi nina katika viatu Emmert wa, siwezi kulalamika.
Kufundisha search unafanyika na Turner ina moyo wake kuweka katika Tyrone Willingham. Ni kukodisha Turner ya. Siyo kukodisha Emmert ya. Hakika Emmert alikuwa na saini mbali juu ya kukodisha. Ni sawa. Unataka kutupa baadhi lawama juu yake kwa kutokuwa mtizamo yanatofautiana kukodisha. Ni sawa. Lakini kukodisha si wajibu Emmert ya. Ni wajibu Turner ya. Ni wajibu Emmert ya kushikilia Turner kuwajibika kwa ajili ya mshahara (ambayo alifanya miaka 3 baadaye wakati ni wazi kwamba Tyrone hakuwa jibu).
Hivyo Tyrone huenda 2-9 mwaka wa kwanza baada ya mwaka 1-10. Si kubwa. Onyo ishara ya kuanza kwenda mbali, hasa kwa baadhi ya matokeo mabaya kuifunga michezo. Lakini ni mwaka wa kwanza wa utawala wa na vigumu kweli kupata muhimu pia.
mwaka ujao mpango unaendelea 5-7 na ina 2 matukio muhimu. Tukio la kwanza kubwa ni kupoteza QB na jeraha. Nadhani wengi anaweza kusema kuwa bila ya kupoteza cha Isaya mwaka huo, twende 6-6. Tukio la pili iliyokuwa muhimu ilikuwa "ghafla mwandamizi" siku na kupoteza unexplicable kwa Stanford na zaidi emotionless soka timu yeyote aliyewahi kuona. Kwa mara nyingine tena, kuna kutosha huko kwa moto Tyrone katika hatua hiyo. Kuna onyo ishara. Kuna ardhi kwa kiasi pretty kuwaambia Tyrone kwamba mwaka uliofuata ni hatua mwaka ambapo kitu inahitaji kutokea. Yeye ni juu ya leash mfupi katika hatua hii kwa maoni yangu.
Mwaka uliofuata tunapoteza michezo katika njia ambazo ni hayaelezeki. Pigo hasara kubwa kwa Arizona - mchezo tunapaswa hawajawahi kupotea. kuishia ya ujinga ya Kombe Apple nimekuwa milele kuonekana ambapo guy alikuwa wazi kwa yadi 20 kutoka nje ya muda umekwisha. Kupiga jozi ya 21 hatua inaongoza kwa Hawai'i. Ni pretty wazi katika hatua hii kwamba mambo walikuwa si kazi. Coaching mabadiliko ilikuwa katika mpangilio. Labda mabadiliko AD pia alikuwa katika utaratibu. Mabadiliko kufundisha ilikuwa imefungwa na ngumu. kichwa AD walianguka - na haki hivyo kutokana na baadhi ya masuala mengine ambayo alikuwa na vile kukodisha kutisha wa kocha mkuu.
Kabla ya uamuzi kwa moto Tyrone baada ya 2007, ni vigumu kweli kweli kwa kujadiliana chochote Emmert alikuwa amefanya kuhusiana na mpango wa soka.
Mimi kusema kwamba kuleta Tyrone nyuma kwa ajili ya 2008 ilikuwa disasterous kosa. Ni lazima sijawahi kilichotokea. Unataka kutupa 0-12 juu ya Emmert - mimi nina wote kwa ajili yake. Nadhani kama wewe hawakupata Emmert katika kutafakari, kweli sasa, atakuwa kuwaambia katika hindsight kwamba lazima kuwa alifanya hoja na kwamba si thamani mauaji ya 0-12.
Tupa Emmert chini ya basi kwa 2008. Ni shauri lake. 2004-2007? Si sana. Kwa njia zote, tafadhali, tafadhali niambie ambapo yeye ana jukumu la 2004 na 2007 zaidi ya ukweli kwamba yeye Rais Chuo Kikuu. Tafadhali nieleze hatua gani maalum ambayo alifanya kudhoofisha mpango. Wewe si kwenda kupata yao - wao si huko.
upinzani wako wa Emmert ni ujinga. upinzani wako wa Woodward ni downright comical.
Ambapo ina Woodward Star programu hii? Yeye tu na jukumu la mpango huu katika mwaka wa 2008 katika nafasi ya wakati wote. Je, wewe kwenda kufanya yake moto kwa kuwa AD mpito kwa nusu ya kwanza ya 2008? Je yeye wajibu wa kitu chochote kutoka 2004-2007 wakati alipokuwa hata wanaohusika na Athletic Department? Majadiliano juu ya nadharia njama. Hii inaweza kuwa moja ya kampuni kubwa ya nadharia njama nimekuwa milele kuonekana.
Sipendi kupoteza. Sipendi kile nimeona mwisho ya miaka 5. Ni alifanya mimi mgonjwa tumboni mara nyingi zaidi. Lakini tofauti na wewe, naweza angalau kuchukua hatua nyuma na kutambua kwamba mwanzo wa tatizo hili alianza vizuri kabla Mark Emmert kuwa Rais wa Chuo Kikuu cha Washington.
Kama mimi alitumia muda wangu kuwa "mindless Mbio Bannon minion," basi ningependa kuwa wanaamini kwamba mantiki tu maelezo kwa kushindwa kwetu kuwa Mark Emmert na Scott Woodward.
Kabisa kusema ukweli, kwamba maoni ni moja ya wengi idiotic mawazo insanely kijinga kwamba nimekuwa milele kuonekana katika maisha yangu.
Sina kutetea "malengo mabaya." Kuna lawama kwa kutupwa njia Emmert ya. I urahisi kutambua hilo. Lakini si lawama yake kamili. Babs inastahili lawama. Gerberding inastahili lawama. McCormick anastahili baadhi lawama. Slick anastahili baadhi lawama. Gilby anastahili baadhi lawama. Turner anastahili baadhi lawama. Tyrone anastahili baadhi lawama. Majina Nimekuwa waliotajwa, 3 tu ya majina ya wale na ratiba yoyote iliyoingia katika sehemu yoyote ya umiliki Emmert ya. Hiyo ni chini ya nusu ya majina hayo.
Kusema ukweli kabisa Mbio, wewe ni darasa dunia punda. Ninaposikia watu Bitch na moan kuhusu watu katika Jimbo la Washington - wewe kioo mfano wa nini watu Bitch kuhusu Jimbo la Washington. Ninaposikia watu Bitch kuhusu mashabiki wa Chuo Kikuu cha Washington na nini malalamiko yao ni, unawakilisha nini malalamiko hayo ni.
Kwa maoni yangu, wewe si nzuri kwa ajili ya Chuo Kikuu cha Washington. Wewe si kusaidia mpango. Wewe si kusaidia Chuo Kikuu. Wewe ni kabisa binafsi kuwahudumia na pompous, egotistical jerk.
Wewe ni barking juu ya mti vibaya kama wewe ni kwenda baada ya mimi. Sina naive kutosha shove kichwa changu hadi sasa juu ya punda wangu kupuuza kile naona. Sidhani kuwa kuna mtu yeyote anayejua mimi kuwa kusema kwamba mimi bila kuwaita jembe jembe.
kwamba kulipa kwa ajili ya na kuhudhuria Michezo yote kwa muda mrefu kuliko nimekuwa hai aliyokutendea anapewa uwezo wanaonekana kwenda kuwa machungu ya zamani mtu. Hongera kwa hilo.
Shukrani kwa ajili ya kuonyesha wale wa kwetu katika kizazi kipya jinsi si kutenda katika miaka 20-30 wakati sisi ni katika viatu yako.
Unataka kupata kinga mbali Mbio? Unataka kupata chini katika pissing mechi? Hebu kufanya hivyo. Hebu unaendelea.
Nina kupata kabisa kulishwa juu na chuki yako, negativity, na kutupa watu chini ya basi.
Kusema ukweli kabisa Endesha, mimi ni sana, sana furaha kwamba mimi sijui wewe. Nina furaha kabisa kwamba mimi si kusababisha kile kinachoonekana kuwa kama maisha ya kusikitisha kwamba ni wanakabiliwa na kutafuta negativity katika kila hali. Unahitaji kwenda kupata kitu kutabasamu katika. Ya mwisho I checked, ni Summertime. hali ya hewa katika Seattle inaonekana kuwa pretty damn nzuri sasa hivi - kwa nini wewe kwenda kuangalia kwamba nje.
Wewe ni pretty damn mbaya juu ya mambo. Unaweza kufikiri kwamba kiasi cha muda kwamba mwendelee spewing maoni yako kuwa hiyo umefanya sasa kusikia mara ya kutosha kuwa wewe ni sahihi. Hafanyi wewe haki.
Kuongea juu 12-47 kama hicho kilichotokea nje ya anga ya bluu. Sijawahi kuona wewe mara moja zinaonyesha kwamba mchakato wa kuanguka kwa mpango huu ulianza vizuri kabla Emmert aliwasili.
Unataka ukweli? Unataka kweli? Hapa ni kweli yako.
Emmert alikuja UW kabla ya UTUKUFU 1-10 msimu chini ya Gilby. mwaka kabla ya hapo (2003) Gilby imeweza kufanya kutosha kupata sisi 6-6, lakini hiyo ni pamoja na debacle katika Cal ambapo sisi aliacha 700 yadi (au thereabouts). Ilikuwa tofauti timu ambayo pretty much alikuwa katika bora mediocre. Tulipoteza 5 ya mwisho 8 zetu, ikiwa ni pamoja na blowout kwa Cal, blowout na UCLA, na hasara nyumbani kwa NEVADA. Ndio, mpango alikuwa anaelekea katika mwelekeo sahihi.
Msimu 2002 chini Slick mara nyingine Sterling msimu mfano kwamba ni zaidi alikumbuka kwa ajili ya "Northwest michuano." Hiyo ilikuwa kubwa. Lakini kujificha ukweli kwamba kwenda katika "Northwest michuano" tulikuwa 4-5 soka timu ambayo alikuwa pretty much utani katika 1-4 katika mkutano huo. Katika wawili mwaka 2002 na 2003, sisi kumaliza msimu na rekodi 4-4 mkutano huo.
Hizi hazikuwa timu za kandanda nzuri. mwenendo mara kichwa kuteremka.
Emmert kuja kwenye bodi na mara anapata sadled kwa Gilby 1-10 debacle.
Kabla ya Emmert kuja kwenye bodi, Babs anaruka meli baada ya miongo ya menejimenti mbovu, ikiwa ni pamoja na kuruhusu uwanja wa kuanza mchakato mmomonyoko.
Katika mwaka wa 2003, sisi ni wanakabiliwa na kuondoka Slick na kesi ya baadaye (s), Dk Feelgood, na fujo nzima na mpango Softball na Teresa Wilson.
Sasa kumbuka yafuatayo: Haya yote yalitokea KABLA Emmert WAS mahali popote karibu KUWA RAIS WA Chuo Kikuu cha Washington.
Mambo hayakuwa katika sura kuu. Nadhani tu kuhusu kila mtu alijua kuwa.
Kamati ya utafutaji inaundwa kuchukua nafasi Babs. Bor, juu ya chuo, na wafuasi kubwa ya wafadhili wa shule ni mgonjwa wa yai kuonekana kwenye uso wao. Wao ni wagonjwa wa nchi klabu Babs mbio na njia huru alikimbilia idara - hasa katika mwanga wa nini aliendelea na Slick. Walitaka mtu prim, sahihi, na ni nani wangeweza kuhesabu hakutaka Sully jina Chuo Kikuu. ENTER TODD TURNER.
Sasa, hii pretty much anapata hadi mahali ambapo Emmert aliajiriwa. Je, alikuwa na kutia saini mbali juu ya ajira ya Turner? Uwezekano mkubwa. Lakini chochote.
Katika hatua hii, Emmert haina dhamana kwa uwanjani utendaji wa mpango wa soka. Kuna kocha katika nafasi. Siyo kazi Emmert ya kusimamia mpango wa mpira au mpango mwingine wowote katika idara ya riadha. kazi ambayo ni ya Todd Turner. Ni kazi Emmert ya kufuatilia utendaji kazi wa Todd Turner.
Hivyo 1-10 kinatokea. Gilby ni makopo na Turner (haki hivyo). Ndiyo, mpango akaenda 1-10. Lakini matendo ya wale kushtakiwa kwa kusimamia mpango walikuwa sahihi. Turner fired kocha kwa ajili ya utendaji maskini. Kama mimi nina katika viatu Emmert wa, siwezi kulalamika.
Kufundisha search unafanyika na Turner ina moyo wake kuweka katika Tyrone Willingham. Ni kukodisha Turner ya. Siyo kukodisha Emmert ya. Hakika Emmert alikuwa na saini mbali juu ya kukodisha. Ni sawa. Unataka kutupa baadhi lawama juu yake kwa kutokuwa mtizamo yanatofautiana kukodisha. Ni sawa. Lakini kukodisha si wajibu Emmert ya. Ni wajibu Turner ya. Ni wajibu Emmert ya kushikilia Turner kuwajibika kwa ajili ya mshahara (ambayo alifanya miaka 3 baadaye wakati ni wazi kwamba Tyrone hakuwa jibu).
Hivyo Tyrone huenda 2-9 mwaka wa kwanza baada ya mwaka 1-10. Si kubwa. Onyo ishara ya kuanza kwenda mbali, hasa kwa baadhi ya matokeo mabaya kuifunga michezo. Lakini ni mwaka wa kwanza wa utawala wa na vigumu kweli kupata muhimu pia.
mwaka ujao mpango unaendelea 5-7 na ina 2 matukio muhimu. Tukio la kwanza kubwa ni kupoteza QB na jeraha. Nadhani wengi anaweza kusema kuwa bila ya kupoteza cha Isaya mwaka huo, twende 6-6. Tukio la pili iliyokuwa muhimu ilikuwa "ghafla mwandamizi" siku na kupoteza unexplicable kwa Stanford na zaidi emotionless soka timu yeyote aliyewahi kuona. Kwa mara nyingine tena, kuna kutosha huko kwa moto Tyrone katika hatua hiyo. Kuna onyo ishara. Kuna ardhi kwa kiasi pretty kuwaambia Tyrone kwamba mwaka uliofuata ni hatua mwaka ambapo kitu inahitaji kutokea. Yeye ni juu ya leash mfupi katika hatua hii kwa maoni yangu.
Mwaka uliofuata tunapoteza michezo katika njia ambazo ni hayaelezeki. Pigo hasara kubwa kwa Arizona - mchezo tunapaswa hawajawahi kupotea. kuishia ya ujinga ya Kombe Apple nimekuwa milele kuonekana ambapo guy alikuwa wazi kwa yadi 20 kutoka nje ya muda umekwisha. Kupiga jozi ya 21 hatua inaongoza kwa Hawai'i. Ni pretty wazi katika hatua hii kwamba mambo walikuwa si kazi. Coaching mabadiliko ilikuwa katika mpangilio. Labda mabadiliko AD pia alikuwa katika utaratibu. Mabadiliko kufundisha ilikuwa imefungwa na ngumu. kichwa AD walianguka - na haki hivyo kutokana na baadhi ya masuala mengine ambayo alikuwa na vile kukodisha kutisha wa kocha mkuu.
Kabla ya uamuzi kwa moto Tyrone baada ya 2007, ni vigumu kweli kweli kwa kujadiliana chochote Emmert alikuwa amefanya kuhusiana na mpango wa soka.
Mimi kusema kwamba kuleta Tyrone nyuma kwa ajili ya 2008 ilikuwa disasterous kosa. Ni lazima sijawahi kilichotokea. Unataka kutupa 0-12 juu ya Emmert - mimi nina wote kwa ajili yake. Nadhani kama wewe hawakupata Emmert katika kutafakari, kweli sasa, atakuwa kuwaambia katika hindsight kwamba lazima kuwa alifanya hoja na kwamba si thamani mauaji ya 0-12.
Tupa Emmert chini ya basi kwa 2008. Ni shauri lake. 2004-2007? Si sana. Kwa njia zote, tafadhali, tafadhali niambie ambapo yeye ana jukumu la 2004 na 2007 zaidi ya ukweli kwamba yeye Rais Chuo Kikuu. Tafadhali nieleze hatua gani maalum ambayo alifanya kudhoofisha mpango. Wewe si kwenda kupata yao - wao si huko.
upinzani wako wa Emmert ni ujinga. upinzani wako wa Woodward ni downright comical.
Ambapo ina Woodward Star programu hii? Yeye tu na jukumu la mpango huu katika mwaka wa 2008 katika nafasi ya wakati wote. Je, wewe kwenda kufanya yake moto kwa kuwa AD mpito kwa nusu ya kwanza ya 2008? Je yeye wajibu wa kitu chochote kutoka 2004-2007 wakati alipokuwa hata wanaohusika na Athletic Department? Majadiliano juu ya nadharia njama. Hii inaweza kuwa moja ya kampuni kubwa ya nadharia njama nimekuwa milele kuonekana.
Sipendi kupoteza. Sipendi kile nimeona mwisho ya miaka 5. Ni alifanya mimi mgonjwa tumboni mara nyingi zaidi. Lakini tofauti na wewe, naweza angalau kuchukua hatua nyuma na kutambua kwamba mwanzo wa tatizo hili alianza vizuri kabla Mark Emmert kuwa Rais wa Chuo Kikuu cha Washington.
Kama mimi alitumia muda wangu kuwa "mindless Mbio Bannon minion," basi ningependa kuwa wanaamini kwamba mantiki tu maelezo kwa kushindwa kwetu kuwa Mark Emmert na Scott Woodward.
Kabisa kusema ukweli, kwamba maoni ni moja ya wengi idiotic mawazo insanely kijinga kwamba nimekuwa milele kuonekana katika maisha yangu.
Sina kutetea "malengo mabaya." Kuna lawama kwa kutupwa njia Emmert ya. I urahisi kutambua hilo. Lakini si lawama yake kamili. Babs inastahili lawama. Gerberding inastahili lawama. McCormick anastahili baadhi lawama. Slick anastahili baadhi lawama. Gilby anastahili baadhi lawama. Turner anastahili baadhi lawama. Tyrone anastahili baadhi lawama. Majina Nimekuwa waliotajwa, 3 tu ya majina ya wale na ratiba yoyote iliyoingia katika sehemu yoyote ya umiliki Emmert ya. Hiyo ni chini ya nusu ya majina hayo.
Kusema ukweli kabisa Mbio, wewe ni darasa dunia punda. Ninaposikia watu Bitch na moan kuhusu watu katika Jimbo la Washington - wewe kioo mfano wa nini watu Bitch kuhusu Jimbo la Washington. Ninaposikia watu Bitch kuhusu mashabiki wa Chuo Kikuu cha Washington na nini malalamiko yao ni, unawakilisha nini malalamiko hayo ni.
Kwa maoni yangu, wewe si nzuri kwa ajili ya Chuo Kikuu cha Washington. Wewe si kusaidia mpango. Wewe si kusaidia Chuo Kikuu. Wewe ni kabisa binafsi kuwahudumia na pompous, egotistical jerk.
Wewe ni barking juu ya mti vibaya kama wewe ni kwenda baada ya mimi. Sina naive kutosha shove kichwa changu hadi sasa juu ya punda wangu kupuuza kile naona. Sidhani kuwa kuna mtu yeyote anayejua mimi kuwa kusema kwamba mimi bila kuwaita jembe jembe.
kwamba kulipa kwa ajili ya na kuhudhuria Michezo yote kwa muda mrefu kuliko nimekuwa hai aliyokutendea anapewa uwezo wanaonekana kwenda kuwa machungu ya zamani mtu. Hongera kwa hilo.
Shukrani kwa ajili ya kuonyesha wale wa kwetu katika kizazi kipya jinsi si kutenda katika miaka 20-30 wakati sisi ni katika viatu yako.
Comments
I’m getting completely fed up with your hate, negativity, and throwing people under the bus.
Quite frankly Race, I’m very, VERY happy that I don’t know you. I’m quite happy that I don’t lead what appears to be such a pathetic life that is faced with looking for the negativity in every situation. You need to go find something to smile at. Last I checked, it’s summertime. The weather in Seattle seems to be pretty damn good right now – why don’t you go check that out.
You are pretty damn wrong about things. You may think that the amount of time that you keep spewing your views that that you’ve now heard it enough times that you are right. Doesn’t make you right.
You talk about 12-47 like that happened out of the blue sky. I’ve never seen you once suggest that the process of the downfall of this program began well before Emmert arrived.
You want facts? You want truth? Here’s your truth.
Emmert came to the UW prior to the GLORIOUS 1-10 season under Gilby. The year before that (2003) Gilby managed to do enough to get us to 6-6, but that included the debacle at Cal where we gave up 700 yards (or thereabouts). It was an indifferent team that pretty much was at best mediocre. We lost 5 of our last 8, including the blowout to Cal, the blowout to UCLA, and a home loss to NEVADA. Yep, the program was heading in the right direction.
The 2002 season under Slick was another sterling season example that is most remembered for the “Northwest Championship.” That was great. But it hid the fact that going into the “Northwest Championship” we were a 4-5 football team that was pretty much a joke at 1-4 in the conference. In both 2002 and 2003, we finished the season with a 4-4 conference record.
These weren’t good football teams. The trend was heading downhill.
Emmert comes on board and immediately gets sadled with the Gilby 1-10 debacle.
Prior to Emmert coming on board, Babs jumps ship after a decade of mis-management, including allowing the stadium to begin the erosion process.
Throughout 2003, we’re faced with Slick leaving and the subsequent lawsuit(s), Dr. Feelgood, and a whole mess with the softball program and Teresa Wilson.
Now keep in mind the following: ALL THIS HAPPENED BEFORE EMMERT WAS ANYWHERE NEAR BEING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON.
Things were not in great shape. I think just about everybody knew that.
A search committee is formed to replace Babs. The BOR, upper campus, and the big donor supporters of the school are sick of the egg showing up on their face. They are sick of the country club that Babs ran and the loose way she ran the department – particularly in light of what went on with Slick. They wanted someone prim, proper, and who they could count on would not sully the University name. ENTER TODD TURNER.
Now, this pretty much gets you up to the point where Emmert was hired. Did he have to sign off on the hiring of Turner? Most likely. But whatever.
At this point, Emmert isn’t responsible for the on-field performance of the football program. There is a coach in place. It’s not Emmert’s job to oversee the football program or any other program in the athletic department. That job belongs to Todd Turner. It’s Emmert’s job to monitor the job performance of Todd Turner.
So 1-10 happens. Gilby is canned by Turner (rightfully so). Yes, the program went 1-10. But the actions of those charged with overseeing the program were correct. Turner fired the coach for poor performance. If I’m in Emmert’s shoes, I can’t complain.
Coaching search takes place and Turner has his heart set on Tyrone Willingham. It’s Turner’s hire. It’s not Emmert’s hire. Surely Emmert had to sign off on the hire. That’s fine. You want to throw some blame on him for not having the foresight to negate the hire. That’s fine. But the hire isn’t Emmert’s responsibility. It’s Turner’s responsibility. It’s Emmert’s responsibility to hold Turner accountable for the hire (which he did 3 years later when it was obvious that Tyrone wasn’t the answer).
So Tyrone goes 2-9 the first year after a 1-10 year. Not great. Warning signs start going off, particularly with some poor performance to close games. But it’s the first year of the regime and really hard to get too critical.
The next year the program goes 5-7 and has 2 significant events. The first significant event is the loss of the QB to injury. I think many could argue that without the loss of Isaiah that year, we go 6-6. The second event that was significant was the “suddenly senior” day and the unexplicable loss to Stanford with the most emotionless football team anybody had ever seen. Again, there’s not enough there to fire Tyrone at that point. There are warning signs. There is ground to pretty much tell Tyrone that the following year is an action year where something needs to happen. He’s on a short leash at this point in my opinion.
The following year we lose games in ways that are unexplainable. Blow a huge loss to Arizona – a game we should have never lost. The most ridiculous ending to an Apple Cup I’ve ever seen where a guy was open by 20 yards coming out of a timeout. Blowing a pair of 21 point leads to Hawai’i. It was pretty obvious at this point that things weren’t working. Coaching change was in order. Perhaps an AD change was also in order. The coaching change was blocked and complicated. The AD’s head fell – and rightfully so due to some other issues that he had and such a terrible hire of a head coach.
Prior to the decision to fire Tyrone after 2007, it’s really hard to argue with ANYTHING that Emmert had done with respect to the football program.
I will say that bringing Tyrone back for 2008 was a disasterous mistake. It should have never happened. You want to throw 0-12 on Emmert – I’m all for it. I think if you caught Emmert in a reflective, truthful moment, he would tell you in hindsight that he should have made the move and that it wasn’t worth the carnage of 0-12.
Throw Emmert under the bus for 2008. That’s his responsibility. 2004-2007? Not so much. By all means, please, please tell me where he has responsibility for 2004 and 2007 other than the fact that he’s the University President. Please tell me what specific actions that he did to undermine the program. You aren’t going to find them – they aren’t there.
Your criticism of Emmert is ridiculous. Your criticism of Woodward is just downright comical.
Where has Woodward screwed this program? He has only been responsible for this program in the summer of 2008 in a full-time role. Are you going to hold him to the fire for being the interim AD for the first half of 2008? How is he responsible for anything from 2004-2007 when he wasn’t even involved with the Athletic Department? Talk about conspiracy theories. This may be one of the greatest conspiracy theories I’ve ever seen.
I don’t like losing. I don’t like what I’ve seen the last 5 years. It’s made me sick to my stomach many times over. But unlike you, I can at least take a step back and realize that the genesis of this problem began well before Mark Emmert became President of the University of Washington.
If I spent my time being a “mindless Race Bannon minion,” then I’d be convinced that the only logical explanation for our failures have been Mark Emmert and Scott Woodward.
Quite frankly, that opinion is one of the most idiotic insanely stupid opinions that I’ve ever seen in my life.
I don’t defend the “wrong targets.” There is blame to be thrown Emmert’s way. I readily acknowledge that. But it isn’t his full blame. Babs deserves blame. Gerberding deserves blame. McCormick deserves some blame. Slick deserves some blame. Gilby deserves some blame. Turner deserves some blame. Tyrone deserves some blame. Of the names I’ve listed, only 3 of those names have any timeline that extends into any portion of Emmert’s tenure. That’s less than half of those names.
Quite frankly Race, you are a world class donkey. When I hear people bitch and moan about the people in the State of Washington – you are a crystal example of why people bitch about the State of Washington. When I hear people that bitch about the fans of the University of Washington and what their complaints are, you represent what those complaints are.
In my opinion, you are not good for the University of Washington. You aren’t helping the program. You aren’t helping the University. You are entirely self-serving and a pompous, egotistical jerk.
You are barking up the wrong tree if you are going after me. I’m not naive enough to shove my head so far up my arse to ignore what I am seeing. I don’t think that there is anybody that knows me that would say that I wouldn’t call a spade a spade.
All that paying for and attending games longer than I’ve been alive has done for you is given you a perceived ability to go be a bitter old man. Congrats on that.
Thanks for showing those of us in a younger generation how not to act in 20-30 years when we are in your shoes.
Nina kupata kabisa kulishwa juu na chuki yako, negativity, na kutupa watu chini ya basi.
Kusema ukweli kabisa Endesha, mimi ni sana, sana furaha kwamba mimi sijui wewe. Nina furaha kabisa kwamba mimi si kusababisha kile kinachoonekana kuwa kama maisha ya kusikitisha kwamba ni wanakabiliwa na kutafuta negativity katika kila hali. Unahitaji kwenda kupata kitu kutabasamu katika. Ya mwisho I checked, ni Summertime. hali ya hewa katika Seattle inaonekana kuwa pretty damn nzuri sasa hivi - kwa nini wewe kwenda kuangalia kwamba nje.
Wewe ni pretty damn mbaya juu ya mambo. Unaweza kufikiri kwamba kiasi cha muda kwamba mwendelee spewing maoni yako kuwa hiyo umefanya sasa kusikia mara ya kutosha kuwa wewe ni sahihi. Hafanyi wewe haki.
Kuongea juu 12-47 kama hicho kilichotokea nje ya anga ya bluu. Sijawahi kuona wewe mara moja zinaonyesha kwamba mchakato wa kuanguka kwa mpango huu ulianza vizuri kabla Emmert aliwasili.
Unataka ukweli? Unataka kweli? Hapa ni kweli yako.
Emmert alikuja UW kabla ya UTUKUFU 1-10 msimu chini ya Gilby. mwaka kabla ya hapo (2003) Gilby imeweza kufanya kutosha kupata sisi 6-6, lakini hiyo ni pamoja na debacle katika Cal ambapo sisi aliacha 700 yadi (au thereabouts). Ilikuwa tofauti timu ambayo pretty much alikuwa katika bora mediocre. Tulipoteza 5 ya mwisho 8 zetu, ikiwa ni pamoja na blowout kwa Cal, blowout na UCLA, na hasara nyumbani kwa NEVADA. Ndio, mpango alikuwa anaelekea katika mwelekeo sahihi.
Msimu 2002 chini Slick mara nyingine Sterling msimu mfano kwamba ni zaidi alikumbuka kwa ajili ya "Northwest michuano." Hiyo ilikuwa kubwa. Lakini kujificha ukweli kwamba kwenda katika "Northwest michuano" tulikuwa 4-5 soka timu ambayo alikuwa pretty much utani katika 1-4 katika mkutano huo. Katika wawili mwaka 2002 na 2003, sisi kumaliza msimu na rekodi 4-4 mkutano huo.
Hizi hazikuwa timu za kandanda nzuri. mwenendo mara kichwa kuteremka.
Emmert kuja kwenye bodi na mara anapata sadled kwa Gilby 1-10 debacle.
Kabla ya Emmert kuja kwenye bodi, Babs anaruka meli baada ya miongo ya menejimenti mbovu, ikiwa ni pamoja na kuruhusu uwanja wa kuanza mchakato mmomonyoko.
Katika mwaka wa 2003, sisi ni wanakabiliwa na kuondoka Slick na kesi ya baadaye (s), Dk Feelgood, na fujo nzima na mpango Softball na Teresa Wilson.
Sasa kumbuka yafuatayo: Haya yote yalitokea KABLA Emmert WAS mahali popote karibu KUWA RAIS WA Chuo Kikuu cha Washington.
Mambo hayakuwa katika sura kuu. Nadhani tu kuhusu kila mtu alijua kuwa.
Kamati ya utafutaji inaundwa kuchukua nafasi Babs. Bor, juu ya chuo, na wafuasi kubwa ya wafadhili wa shule ni mgonjwa wa yai kuonekana kwenye uso wao. Wao ni wagonjwa wa nchi klabu Babs mbio na njia huru alikimbilia idara - hasa katika mwanga wa nini aliendelea na Slick. Walitaka mtu prim, sahihi, na ni nani wangeweza kuhesabu hakutaka Sully jina Chuo Kikuu. ENTER TODD TURNER.
Sasa, hii pretty much anapata hadi mahali ambapo Emmert aliajiriwa. Je, alikuwa na kutia saini mbali juu ya ajira ya Turner? Uwezekano mkubwa. Lakini chochote.
Katika hatua hii, Emmert haina dhamana kwa uwanjani utendaji wa mpango wa soka. Kuna kocha katika nafasi. Siyo kazi Emmert ya kusimamia mpango wa mpira au mpango mwingine wowote katika idara ya riadha. kazi ambayo ni ya Todd Turner. Ni kazi Emmert ya kufuatilia utendaji kazi wa Todd Turner.
Hivyo 1-10 kinatokea. Gilby ni makopo na Turner (haki hivyo). Ndiyo, mpango akaenda 1-10. Lakini matendo ya wale kushtakiwa kwa kusimamia mpango walikuwa sahihi. Turner fired kocha kwa ajili ya utendaji maskini. Kama mimi nina katika viatu Emmert wa, siwezi kulalamika.
Kufundisha search unafanyika na Turner ina moyo wake kuweka katika Tyrone Willingham. Ni kukodisha Turner ya. Siyo kukodisha Emmert ya. Hakika Emmert alikuwa na saini mbali juu ya kukodisha. Ni sawa. Unataka kutupa baadhi lawama juu yake kwa kutokuwa mtizamo yanatofautiana kukodisha. Ni sawa. Lakini kukodisha si wajibu Emmert ya. Ni wajibu Turner ya. Ni wajibu Emmert ya kushikilia Turner kuwajibika kwa ajili ya mshahara (ambayo alifanya miaka 3 baadaye wakati ni wazi kwamba Tyrone hakuwa jibu).
Hivyo Tyrone huenda 2-9 mwaka wa kwanza baada ya mwaka 1-10. Si kubwa. Onyo ishara ya kuanza kwenda mbali, hasa kwa baadhi ya matokeo mabaya kuifunga michezo. Lakini ni mwaka wa kwanza wa utawala wa na vigumu kweli kupata muhimu pia.
mwaka ujao mpango unaendelea 5-7 na ina 2 matukio muhimu. Tukio la kwanza kubwa ni kupoteza QB na jeraha. Nadhani wengi anaweza kusema kuwa bila ya kupoteza cha Isaya mwaka huo, twende 6-6. Tukio la pili iliyokuwa muhimu ilikuwa "ghafla mwandamizi" siku na kupoteza unexplicable kwa Stanford na zaidi emotionless soka timu yeyote aliyewahi kuona. Kwa mara nyingine tena, kuna kutosha huko kwa moto Tyrone katika hatua hiyo. Kuna onyo ishara. Kuna ardhi kwa kiasi pretty kuwaambia Tyrone kwamba mwaka uliofuata ni hatua mwaka ambapo kitu inahitaji kutokea. Yeye ni juu ya leash mfupi katika hatua hii kwa maoni yangu.
Mwaka uliofuata tunapoteza michezo katika njia ambazo ni hayaelezeki. Pigo hasara kubwa kwa Arizona - mchezo tunapaswa hawajawahi kupotea. kuishia ya ujinga ya Kombe Apple nimekuwa milele kuonekana ambapo guy alikuwa wazi kwa yadi 20 kutoka nje ya muda umekwisha. Kupiga jozi ya 21 hatua inaongoza kwa Hawai'i. Ni pretty wazi katika hatua hii kwamba mambo walikuwa si kazi. Coaching mabadiliko ilikuwa katika mpangilio. Labda mabadiliko AD pia alikuwa katika utaratibu. Mabadiliko kufundisha ilikuwa imefungwa na ngumu. kichwa AD walianguka - na haki hivyo kutokana na baadhi ya masuala mengine ambayo alikuwa na vile kukodisha kutisha wa kocha mkuu.
Kabla ya uamuzi kwa moto Tyrone baada ya 2007, ni vigumu kweli kweli kwa kujadiliana chochote Emmert alikuwa amefanya kuhusiana na mpango wa soka.
Mimi kusema kwamba kuleta Tyrone nyuma kwa ajili ya 2008 ilikuwa disasterous kosa. Ni lazima sijawahi kilichotokea. Unataka kutupa 0-12 juu ya Emmert - mimi nina wote kwa ajili yake. Nadhani kama wewe hawakupata Emmert katika kutafakari, kweli sasa, atakuwa kuwaambia katika hindsight kwamba lazima kuwa alifanya hoja na kwamba si thamani mauaji ya 0-12.
Tupa Emmert chini ya basi kwa 2008. Ni shauri lake. 2004-2007? Si sana. Kwa njia zote, tafadhali, tafadhali niambie ambapo yeye ana jukumu la 2004 na 2007 zaidi ya ukweli kwamba yeye Rais Chuo Kikuu. Tafadhali nieleze hatua gani maalum ambayo alifanya kudhoofisha mpango. Wewe si kwenda kupata yao - wao si huko.
upinzani wako wa Emmert ni ujinga. upinzani wako wa Woodward ni downright comical.
Ambapo ina Woodward Star programu hii? Yeye tu na jukumu la mpango huu katika mwaka wa 2008 katika nafasi ya wakati wote. Je, wewe kwenda kufanya yake moto kwa kuwa AD mpito kwa nusu ya kwanza ya 2008? Je yeye wajibu wa kitu chochote kutoka 2004-2007 wakati alipokuwa hata wanaohusika na Athletic Department? Majadiliano juu ya nadharia njama. Hii inaweza kuwa moja ya kampuni kubwa ya nadharia njama nimekuwa milele kuonekana.
Sipendi kupoteza. Sipendi kile nimeona mwisho ya miaka 5. Ni alifanya mimi mgonjwa tumboni mara nyingi zaidi. Lakini tofauti na wewe, naweza angalau kuchukua hatua nyuma na kutambua kwamba mwanzo wa tatizo hili alianza vizuri kabla Mark Emmert kuwa Rais wa Chuo Kikuu cha Washington.
Kama mimi alitumia muda wangu kuwa "mindless Mbio Bannon minion," basi ningependa kuwa wanaamini kwamba mantiki tu maelezo kwa kushindwa kwetu kuwa Mark Emmert na Scott Woodward.
Kabisa kusema ukweli, kwamba maoni ni moja ya wengi idiotic mawazo insanely kijinga kwamba nimekuwa milele kuonekana katika maisha yangu.
Sina kutetea "malengo mabaya." Kuna lawama kwa kutupwa njia Emmert ya. I urahisi kutambua hilo. Lakini si lawama yake kamili. Babs inastahili lawama. Gerberding inastahili lawama. McCormick anastahili baadhi lawama. Slick anastahili baadhi lawama. Gilby anastahili baadhi lawama. Turner anastahili baadhi lawama. Tyrone anastahili baadhi lawama. Majina Nimekuwa waliotajwa, 3 tu ya majina ya wale na ratiba yoyote iliyoingia katika sehemu yoyote ya umiliki Emmert ya. Hiyo ni chini ya nusu ya majina hayo.
Kusema ukweli kabisa Mbio, wewe ni darasa dunia punda. Ninaposikia watu Bitch na moan kuhusu watu katika Jimbo la Washington - wewe kioo mfano wa nini watu Bitch kuhusu Jimbo la Washington. Ninaposikia watu Bitch kuhusu mashabiki wa Chuo Kikuu cha Washington na nini malalamiko yao ni, unawakilisha nini malalamiko hayo ni.
Kwa maoni yangu, wewe si nzuri kwa ajili ya Chuo Kikuu cha Washington. Wewe si kusaidia mpango. Wewe si kusaidia Chuo Kikuu. Wewe ni kabisa binafsi kuwahudumia na pompous, egotistical jerk.
Wewe ni barking juu ya mti vibaya kama wewe ni kwenda baada ya mimi. Sina naive kutosha shove kichwa changu hadi sasa juu ya punda wangu kupuuza kile naona. Sidhani kuwa kuna mtu yeyote anayejua mimi kuwa kusema kwamba mimi bila kuwaita jembe jembe.
kwamba kulipa kwa ajili ya na kuhudhuria Michezo yote kwa muda mrefu kuliko nimekuwa hai aliyokutendea anapewa uwezo wanaonekana kwenda kuwa machungu ya zamani mtu. Hongera kwa hilo.
Shukrani kwa ajili ya kuonyesha wale wa kwetu katika kizazi kipya jinsi si kutenda katika miaka 20-30 wakati sisi ni katika viatu yako.
kutomba mbali
All posters are faggots
Haie is a poster
Therefore ?
What's with the anger, bruh?