Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comey to prison?

124»

Comments

  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774

    dhdawg said:

    Trump played you fools again.

    RUSSIA TRUMP collusion was all over the fake news and with one tweet Donald knocks that off the front page, The NY Times changes their headlines, and we find out that Trump was telling the truth in his endearing 70 year old man way. Wire tap was so quaint but it worked.

    Now who is on the defensive for unmasking American citizens and leaking their shit?

    Winners win.

    trump didn't play anyone.

    his retarded lie forced the FBI director to come out publically and say that trump and his campaign are currently under FBI investigation. that's not winning
    There is no connection between the Trump campaign and Russia. You must have missed them saying that

    Of course he was / is being investigated. It was all over the news about the wire taps. Until it was cleansed.

    Winning more every day
    Paul Manafort and I shared a good laugh together after reading your post.
    More #fakenews

    http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446
    Great two month old link as always.
    Because 2 months ago Ukraine had forged the "documentation" of Manaford getting "bribed" years ago, but between then and now someone has now documented "bribes" from years ago and it just hasn't come out yet.

    Brilliant logic.
    image
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,885
    dflea said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Which is every diplomat here in the US, of which every administration meets lots of. And protocol is that they forward the information to the pertinent people about only the country in question leaving out the American persons involved. Except somebody in Obamas group expanded to anything said not relating to said country and including the American citizens, and then passed it around to everybody so it could get leaked to the press.

    Lots of wrong and illegal in that.
    You live in a fucking fantasy world dude.
    He lives in Houston - so yeah. Ever been to that shithole?
    Anything like Shelton?
  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,233
    salemcoog said:

    dflea said:

    AlCzervik said:

    Which is every diplomat here in the US, of which every administration meets lots of. And protocol is that they forward the information to the pertinent people about only the country in question leaving out the American persons involved. Except somebody in Obamas group expanded to anything said not relating to said country and including the American citizens, and then passed it around to everybody so it could get leaked to the press.

    Lots of wrong and illegal in that.
    You live in a fucking fantasy world dude.
    He lives in Houston - so yeah. Ever been to that shithole?
    Anything like Shelton?
    Nothing at all like Shelton.

    Which is obvious to anyone other than fucking retards like you and the faggots that upvoted your feeble attempt at humor.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,853 Founders Club
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 33,862 Standard Supporter
    dhdawg said:
    It's from CNN. Clinton (or Commie your choice) News Network.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,224
    edited March 2017

    And protocol is that they forward the information to the pertinent people about only the country in question leaving out the American persons involved.
    I'm guessing that's not quite right, but I'm too busy (lazy) to dig into it. But let's see how that would play out:

    1. Put the case that U.S. Intelligence intercepts a call between me and, oh, I don't know, say, Omar al-Shishani.

    2. Put the case that, consistent with said protocol, U.S. Intelligence forwards the content of that conversation to "the pertinent people".

    3. Put the case that U.S. Intelligence only mentions to said "pertinent people" that the conversation involves someone in Syria, and, consistent with said protocol, leaves out any reference to Creepycoug.

    4. Put the case that some guy who goes by "HoustonHusky" believes that's how it actually goes down.

    5. What do you think? Actually?
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    AZDuck said:
    That must be why he is all over the media today expanding on his remarks
    And he continues to "expand on his remarks" today. Nunes fucked up bigly. What a shit show.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    dhdawg said:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151

    oops.

    He wouldn't deny that his source was from the white house.

    He actually admitted his source was from the Executive Branch.

    Dude is way out of his league. I hope he STAYS.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978
    dhdawg said:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151

    oops.

    He wouldn't deny that his source was from the white house.

    Huh? He specifically said the West Wing "had no idea I was there".

    Just because he has a source in the Executive Branch it does not mean its part of Trump's team...if you haven't figured it out by now the govt is kinda large. It could be SS or it could be all sorts of things. The rumor is that he was pulling PDBs given to Obama (which explains him being there as getting access to them is not easy), which if they were gossip on Trump's transition (and eventually leaked to the NYTs and WP) then it brings up all sorts of issues.

    Nunes was the guy that was directly talking with the lower level CIA analysts and found out a lot of the ISIS "intelligence" getting pushed up was getting filtered, and he's the one that dug up the 3 CIA officers in Benghazi that both confirmed and contradicted the administration's description of what happened there. He's better than your average lazy Congressman, which is probably why Schiff and such are so uncomfortable.
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    dhdawg said:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151

    oops.

    He wouldn't deny that his source was from the white house.

    Huh? He specifically said the West Wing "had no idea I was there".

    Just because he has a source in the Executive Branch it does not mean its part of Trump's team...if you haven't figured it out by now the govt is kinda large. It could be SS or it could be all sorts of things. The rumor is that he was pulling PDBs given to Obama (which explains him being there as getting access to them is not easy), which if they were gossip on Trump's transition (and eventually leaked to the NYTs and WP) then it brings up all sorts of issues.

    Nunes was the guy that was directly talking with the lower level CIA analysts and found out a lot of the ISIS "intelligence" getting pushed up was getting filtered, and he's the one that dug up the 3 CIA officers in Benghazi that both confirmed and contradicted the administration's description of what happened there. He's better than your average lazy Congressman, which is probably why Schiff and such are so uncomfortable.
    Gurrrrggglllleeeee
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    dhdawg said:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151

    oops.

    He wouldn't deny that his source was from the white house.

    Huh? He specifically said the West Wing "had no idea I was there".

    Just because he has a source in the Executive Branch it does not mean its part of Trump's team...if you haven't figured it out by now the govt is kinda large. It could be SS or it could be all sorts of things. The rumor is that he was pulling PDBs given to Obama (which explains him being there as getting access to them is not easy), which if they were gossip on Trump's transition (and eventually leaked to the NYTs and WP) then it brings up all sorts of issues.

    Nunes was the guy that was directly talking with the lower level CIA analysts and found out a lot of the ISIS "intelligence" getting pushed up was getting filtered, and he's the one that dug up the 3 CIA officers in Benghazi that both confirmed and contradicted the administration's description of what happened there. He's better than your average lazy Congressman, which is probably why Schiff and such are so uncomfortable.
    If this was legit information, he should have brought Schiff to the Eisenhower Building and shown it to him before running to Trump.

    Nunes has gone full Brownsocks.
  • HoustonHuskyHoustonHusky Member Posts: 5,978

    dhdawg said:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151

    oops.

    He wouldn't deny that his source was from the white house.

    Huh? He specifically said the West Wing "had no idea I was there".

    Just because he has a source in the Executive Branch it does not mean its part of Trump's team...if you haven't figured it out by now the govt is kinda large. It could be SS or it could be all sorts of things. The rumor is that he was pulling PDBs given to Obama (which explains him being there as getting access to them is not easy), which if they were gossip on Trump's transition (and eventually leaked to the NYTs and WP) then it brings up all sorts of issues.

    Nunes was the guy that was directly talking with the lower level CIA analysts and found out a lot of the ISIS "intelligence" getting pushed up was getting filtered, and he's the one that dug up the 3 CIA officers in Benghazi that both confirmed and contradicted the administration's description of what happened there. He's better than your average lazy Congressman, which is probably why Schiff and such are so uncomfortable.
    If this was legit information, he should have brought Schiff to the Eisenhower Building and shown it to him before running to Trump.

    Nunes has gone full Brownsocks.
    If it was legit then he can (did) get the document IDs and subpoena them to both protect his source and get versions to distribute to the committee. If not then then he can't.

    Either way it will be interesting.
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774

    dhdawg said:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/nunes-backs-down-assertion-trump-was-monitored-n738151

    oops.

    He wouldn't deny that his source was from the white house.

    Huh? He specifically said the West Wing "had no idea I was there".

    Just because he has a source in the Executive Branch it does not mean its part of Trump's team...if you haven't figured it out by now the govt is kinda large. It could be SS or it could be all sorts of things. The rumor is that he was pulling PDBs given to Obama (which explains him being there as getting access to them is not easy), which if they were gossip on Trump's transition (and eventually leaked to the NYTs and WP) then it brings up all sorts of issues.

    Nunes was the guy that was directly talking with the lower level CIA analysts and found out a lot of the ISIS "intelligence" getting pushed up was getting filtered, and he's the one that dug up the 3 CIA officers in Benghazi that both confirmed and contradicted the administration's description of what happened there. He's better than your average lazy Congressman, which is probably why Schiff and such are so uncomfortable.
    Holy fucking shit. You get stupider by the day.
Sign In or Register to comment.