How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up?
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?
Kim Jong Un's fat ass could easily be assassinated as he makes numerous public appearances. No one would start WW3 on account of him.
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up?
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?
Kim Jong Un's fat ass could easily be assassinated as he makes numerous public appearances. No one would start WW3 on account of him.
except the North Koreans and the fucking Chinese. Or I guess you're okay with millions of dead Koreans when the NK's VX the fuck out of Seoul, just to kill one fat rich kid?
How come all these fucking terrorists keep popping up?
ISIS and al Qaeda are not North Korea and Iran. Basic Poly Sci 101 shit. You know, the course you prolly flunked.
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes. But I guess you knew that, since you took Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College and all.
Leaders of rogue nations should be legitimate targets.
Sure. But what if they have hundreds of tons of VX and delivery systems within artillery range of the world's fourth largest city?
Kim Jong Un's fat ass could easily be assassinated as he makes numerous public appearances. No one would start WW3 on account of him.
except the North Koreans and the fucking Chinese. Or I guess you're okay with millions of dead Koreans when the NK's VX the fuck out of Seoul, just to kill one fat rich kid?
North Korea would be nuked in return. They know that, and wouldn't retaliate like that just to strike back for Kim Jong Un's assassination.
Why wouldn't #2 step up and become instantly friendly?
That is the most likely scenario after a shocking "shit just got real up in here" moment for DPRK. Question is who do they instantly become friendly with?
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
81% chance the Fat Kid isn't the real leader of NK.
And OBK, there is nothing easy about assassinating any leader, much less one in North Korea. That shithead won't exactly be waddling across a bridge in London within umbrella's reach anytime soon.
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
81% chance the Fat Kid isn't the real leader of NK.
And OBK, there is nothing easy about assassinating any leader, much less one in North Korea. That shithead won't exactly be waddling across a bridge in London within umbrella's reach anytime soon.
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
Really? Please to be explaining said assumptions.
See @GrundleStiltzkin 's post and rethink what you posted. Your assumed "strategy" for getting to the fat kid and the resulting response make no sense at all.
One thing is true. If Un is removed and N. Korea becomes a normal nation, those brewery tours to Pyongyang become less attractive. The thrill of the danger is the only real reason to go on them.
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
Really? Please to be explaining said assumptions.
See @GrundleStiltzkin 's post and rethink what you posted. Your assumed "strategy" for getting to the fat kid and the resulting response make no sense at all.
earlier, in this thread...
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes.
Or are we going to send our super spy assassins into Pyongyang and Teheran?
Do the words "second and third order effects" mean anything to you? Or are you one of those Trumpkins that wants to cut the State Department budget?
Here's a clue, every single general in the Pentagon disagrees with the President.
One thing is true. If Un is removed and N. Korea becomes a normal nation, those brewery tours to Pyongyang become less attractive. The thrill of the danger is the only real reason to go on them.
Lil' Kim dispatched his super spy assassins to Kuala Lumpur to kill his brother Kim Jong Nam. We can do the same to him with the help of the South Koreans.
Apparently everyone here failed Poly Sci 101 at Lane Community College, except Race.
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
Really? Please to be explaining said assumptions.
See @GrundleStiltzkin 's post and rethink what you posted. Your assumed "strategy" for getting to the fat kid and the resulting response make no sense at all.
earlier, in this thread...
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes.
Or are we going to send our super spy assassins into Pyongyang and Teheran?
Do the words "second and third order effects" mean anything to you? Or are you one of those Trumpkins that wants to cut the State Department budget?
Here's a clue, every single general in the Pentagon disagrees with the President.
From the post in this thread I responded to:
"First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind. "
Your words. This implies an assumed strategy on your part that makes no sense.
And here's a doozy
"Here's a clue, every single general in the Pentagon disagrees with the President. "
What does every single general in the pentagon disagree with the president on? ... rhetorical question, no offense but you don't have a clue in this regard.
Lil' Kim dispatched his super spy assassins to Kuala Lumpur to kill his brother Kim Jong Nam. We can do the same to him with the help of the South Koreans.
Comments
First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind.
Second, NK is denied airspace. The Predator flies at about 130 miles per hour. The NKs have a decent air force. They would shoot the fuckers down, and call it an act of war (and they'd be right, for once)
Third, China has the NK's back. They did in 1950 and they do now. China does not want to see a powerful US-client Korean state on the Yalu River. And they won't, because China is an actual superpower and shit.
Fourth, even if we? got the fat kid, the NKs would find someone else. Their country was supposed to collapse when Kim Jong-Il kicked the can, but Fat Kid stepped up to the plate. Any overt military action would just cause the NKs to hunker down in their bunkers and rocket the fuck out of Seoul. The world's fourth largest city.
The stupid here is so thick you can cut it with a fucking knife.
Agree with point three. IMO there is serious risk of negative outcomes if the fat kid were removed without prior coordination with China and the remaining DPRK leaders.
The rest contains stupid assumptions thick enough to cut with a fucking knife.
And OBK, there is nothing easy about assassinating any leader, much less one in North Korea. That shithead won't exactly be waddling across a bridge in London within umbrella's reach anytime soon.
Yeah, we don't fire Hellfires at North Korea and Iran because they are sovereign states that could seriously fuck up the world, even without nukes.
Or are we going to send our super spy assassins into Pyongyang and Teheran?
Do the words "second and third order effects" mean anything to you? Or are you one of those Trumpkins that wants to cut the State Department budget?
Here's a clue, every single general in the Pentagon disagrees with the President.
"First, our "hit" to "miss" rate with Hellfire missiles and idiot Arab terrorists isn't great. It's going to be even worse in North Korea for a lot of reasons. Mountains, air defenses, and bunkers come to mind. "
Your words. This implies an assumed strategy on your part that makes no sense.
And here's a doozy
"Here's a clue, every single general in the Pentagon disagrees with the President. "
What does every single general in the pentagon disagree with the president on? ... rhetorical question, no offense but you don't have a clue in this regard.
Did you guys get a jerb here?