Barring that, keep fighting terrorism wherever it bubbles up, destroy ISIS, Boko Haram, and any other such group that openly and defiantly refuses it's subscription to humanity, and keep any and all suspected or even potential terrorists from entering the US while constantly and diligently seeking to root out and kill (versus imprisoning) home grown terrorists, ideally.
Oh, and don't be stupid like Hillary and Obama and promise to support revolutions among poor people who lack the resources to sustain a drawn out revolutionary fight, then go back on your word when it turns out to be hard, because you don't want to pay the political price from another Iraq-like war on your watch. Oh, and sink more boats full of modern day Barbary pirates on the Mediterranean. That would be my first 100 days.
We are not the world's police force. By your description here, we should invade Russia because it's now legal to beat your wife.
Disagree. That's Bill Clinton's strategy in Afghanistan. Nothing bad grew up there during our isolationist policy phase, did it?
@BennyBeaver: You are a gullible, classically conditioned liberal moron who seeks comfort right in the middle of the sheep herd, where you think "cool & hip" people live. And you won't realize how alone, vulnerable and weak you are until it's too late. I'll be there laughing at you when it happens. In fact, I'm laughing at you already.
@BennyBeaver: You are a gullible, classically conditioned liberal moron who seeks comfort right in the middle of the sheep herd, where you think "cool & hip" people live. And you won't realize how alone, vulnerable and weak you are until it's too late. I'll be there laughing at you when it happens. In fact, I'm laughing at you already.
@BennyBeaver: You are a gullible, classically conditioned liberal moron who seeks comfort right in the middle of the sheep herd, where you think "cool & hip" people live. And you won't realize how alone, vulnerable and weak you are until it's too late. I'll be there laughing at you when it happens. In fact, I'm laughing at you already.
@BennyBeaver: You are a gullible, classically conditioned liberal moron who seeks comfort right in the middle of the sheep herd, where you think "cool & hip" people live. And you won't realize how alone, vulnerable and weak you are until it's too late. I'll be there laughing at you when it happens. In fact, I'm laughing at you already.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
The obsession continues.
But I'll bite. What should we do.
Honestly?
Right. Jesus would want that in his name.
So you're saying we?re a Christian nation?
Turdfucker is the one on the religious kick. No, we aren't a Christian nation, but someone else thinks different.
George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month. Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."
Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."
A senior Palestinian terrorist in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month is your source?
Can't hear you with that Russian cock in your mouth.
You're upset the koran says you have to kill the goat if you dump you itty bitty load in it.
That's actually the Bible (Leviticus) but why quibble over a minor detail.
Islam too. I'll retract slightly I don't know how it's worded in the koran. Saw an Imam answer the question when asked.
Oh so you agree you don't know shit about the Quran but you will want to argue saying it's evil.
It's evil. Just like liberals but worse.
No the people that take the Quran out of context are evil. Dumbfuck.
Agreed. Claiming the book written by a man who married seven year olds and slaughtered tribes across the Arabian Penninsula is a document of peace IS taking it out of context.
You're evil.
Sounds like somebody never read the old testament. The founders and forefathers of Judaism and Christianity did some pretty nasty shit themselves, and believed it was the will of god.
I'd say it is more accurate, to say that all of the religions that sprang from Abraham, have histories that include young wives, multiple wives, and killing those that have different beliefs.
2000 years ago, you mean. So, 2017 says "Hi" ?
Hey shit-for-brains, I was responding to DNC who was talking about the founding of Islam, so I was talking about the founding of the other two Abrahamic religions.
If you can't keep up, stay out of the conversation.
Can't hear you with that Russian cock in your mouth.
You're upset the koran says you have to kill the goat if you dump you itty bitty load in it.
That's actually the Bible (Leviticus) but why quibble over a minor detail.
Islam too. I'll retract slightly I don't know how it's worded in the koran. Saw an Imam answer the question when asked.
Oh so you agree you don't know shit about the Quran but you will want to argue saying it's evil.
It's evil. Just like liberals but worse.
No the people that take the Quran out of context are evil. Dumbfuck.
Agreed. Claiming the book written by a man who married seven year olds and slaughtered tribes across the Arabian Penninsula is a document of peace IS taking it out of context.
You're evil.
Sounds like somebody never read the old testament. The founders and forefathers of Judaism and Christianity did some pretty nasty shit themselves, and believed it was the will of god.
I'd say it is more accurate, to say that all of the religions that sprang from Abraham, have histories that include young wives, multiple wives, and killing those that have different beliefs.
2000 years ago, you mean. So, 2017 says "Hi" ?
Hey shit-for-brains, I was responding to DNC who was talking about the founding of Islam, so I was talking about the founding of the other two Abrahamic religions.
If you can't keep up, stay out of the conversation.
@TurdBuffer needs a trigger warning anytime the mooselimbs are discussed.
@BennyBeaver: You are a gullible, classically conditioned liberal moron who seeks comfort right in the middle of the sheep herd, where you think "cool & hip" people live. And you won't realize how alone, vulnerable and weak you are until it's too late. I'll be there laughing at you when it happens. In fact, I'm laughing at you already.
Classic projection.
You're not denying it.
So, I win.
Lay off Race's schtick.
I'll up-vote that.
Can you answer the question now? It's only been 26 hours since I asked it.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
The obsession continues.
But I'll bite. What should we do.
Honestly?
Right. Jesus would want that in his name.
So you're saying we?re a Christian nation?
Turdfucker is the one on the religious kick. No, we aren't a Christian nation, but someone else thinks different.
George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, according to a senior Palestinian politician in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month. Mr Bush revealed the extent of his religious fervour when he met a Palestinian delegation during the Israeli-Palestinian summit at the Egpytian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh, four months after the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.
One of the delegates, Nabil Shaath, who was Palestinian foreign minister at the time, said: "President Bush said to all of us: 'I am driven with a mission from God'. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did."
Mr Bush went on: "And now, again, I feel God's words coming to me, 'Go get the Palestinians their state and get the Israelis their security, and get peace in the Middle East'. And, by God, I'm gonna do it."
A senior Palestinian terrorist in an interview to be broadcast by the BBC later this month is your source?
Palestian politicians = terrorists in suits
American colonists in goofy wigs used to be called "terrorists" too.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be. And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.
HTH
So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.
HTH
So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.
Well, why didn't you say so?
Humble request. Can you please douse yourself in flammable liquid, light yourself on fire then poast a gif whilst dying in the fucking fire?
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.
HTH
So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.
Well, why didn't you say so?
Holy shit you do not get it. At. All. Yes ISIS is an issue. Turdfucker. Yes there are some whacked out Muslims. Yes there are whacked out Christians. There are whacked out atheists. The problem isn't the religion. It's the culture in those shitty areas. Or else Trump would have included Saudi Arabia, India, etc with high Muslim populations.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.
HTH
So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.
Well, why didn't you say so?
Holy shit you do not get it. At. All. Yes ISIS is an issue. Turdfucker. Yes there are some whacked out Muslims. Yes there are whacked out Christians. There are whacked out atheists. The problem isn't the religion. It's the culture in those shitty areas. Or else Trump would have included Saudi Arabia, India, etc with high Muslim populations.
The problem is Islam, period. ISIS follows Islam to the letter. So does Saudi Arabia. HTH.
I know you're busy denying rapes by muslim refugees in Sweden right now, but it's not like I'm asking a difficult question here, especially for a bright light like yourself who has all the answers.
You seem obsessed. My comment was not in relation to you question, I didn't even see your question until now. It's shocking I know, but I don't read every post on here.
To answer your question, it's not about religion. Countries should take care of the shitty factions in the society. We are not that successful in the US either. Point is, your question is fucktarded.
@turdfucker I answered your question here. I'll your again slowly so you'll maybe understand. It's not the religion that's the issue. The issue is shitty cultures that the religion can be found in. Like Trump's Muslim ban, why was it only from 7 specific counties? You hate Muslims cause of rape and 9/11, but you are OK with Russia legalized beating of the wife and don't give a shit about Saudi Arabia.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Nope. Don't hate all muslims, but you Libs love your hyperbole. Relax kid, you don't threaten anyone.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
I have said nothing about collateral damage. And you are so blinded by the Muslim hysteria that you can't even comprehend what I'm saying. And it has nothing to do with culture of the West being better, look at India. Not to mention our own crime rate is much higher than it should be.And Mexico's culture isn't much better than the middle East. I suppose Muslims are too blame there too?
Hondo, I ask you to stick to the issue and stop jumping all over the map, and you respond by using a bigger map.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
You are searching for a solution to something that's not a problem.
HTH
So Radical Islamist Terrorism is not a problem, but Islamophobia or "Muslim Hysteria" is.
Well, why didn't you say so?
Holy shit you do not get it. At. All. Yes ISIS is an issue. Turdfucker. Yes there are some whacked out Muslims. Yes there are whacked out Christians. There are whacked out atheists. The problem isn't the religion. It's the culture in those shitty areas. Or else Trump would have included Saudi Arabia, India, etc with high Muslim populations.
Ah, of course. Here you go with the canard of "Christians are just as bad as Muslims and do the same thing, so they're all equally as good or bad as each other, so it CAN'T be a religious problem." Right. Except for that inconvenient fact that one religious group is currently doing the bad shit today and constantly threatening more, while the other hasn't engaged in such slaughter in about 400 years. But we should view them and treat them as equal threats, to be fair, I suppose.
Ever heard of Clear and Present danger? What is the current Christian equal of ISIS's threat?
Comments
So, I win.
If you can't keep up, stay out of the conversation.
Can you answer the question now? It's only been 26 hours since I asked it.
We are bombing those countries and trying to take care of ISIS. There are 3 million Muslims living in America just fine. You are a scared snowflake if you think every Muslim is a murderer in hiding.
Once again, (for the 3rd or 4th time), the question I posed was why the 95% plus peace-loving muslims cannot eradicate the 5% or less radical muslims in their midst. You say it has nothing to do with the muslim religion. I say it has everything to do with their religion. What else binds them all in common interest stronger than that? What is the most important institution in those shitty countries and communities, Hondo? The Mosque. And you know it. It's not the police station, school or post office.
I'm glad we agree that bombing ISIS targets is legit, but all your after-the-fact bitching about collateral damage undermines your support for that, so you really are talking from both sides of your mouth on that. OK. No biggie. Nothing new here.
But you still haven't answered the question, Hondo. I'll take "shitty cultures" as an outright admission that the West is heads and tails better than those shitty muslim ones you cite in your argument. And while nobody holds you accountable for every asshole who stones his own daughter to death or cuts of the head of his neighbor, the cutesy "What about Russia(?)" bullshit is just tired, lazy, feeble, and not the issue. And you know it.
You clearly prefer to spew classic reactionary, distracting rhetoric instead of trying to answer the larger questions about solutions. In so doing, you mimic the problems of the Middle East and failed states in general, which is to bitch, complain, burn buildings and blow shit up, then wonder why their shitty cultures and countries can't progress from their third-world status.
You're great at spinning wheels and making smoke, Hondo. But really quite bad at proposing any solutions or explaining what you suggest would be a better solution to the Islamic Terrorism problem worldwide, however small you believe it is. It remains a potent threat so long as money flows to it's various causes and rival groups throughout the Arab world and Middle East, which means the US will continue to kill people in its efforts to control and diminish the threat, giving people like yourself a steady stream of news stories to bitch about and justify muslim terrorism with, with no end in sight. It's the failure of your type of thinking that keeps this problem alive and turns it into a simple numbers game of risk elimination. Reform is the only answer, not ignoring the problem until it lands on the US doorstep again. Been there, done that. Not gonna happen again.
HTH
Well, why didn't you say so?
Ever heard of Clear and Present danger? What is the current Christian equal of ISIS's threat?