Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Beaver football might be on the right track

12357

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,422 Standard Supporter
    AZDuck said:

    Oregon State does well when their coach's last name ends in "sen" or "son." So they should be improved this year.

    What most of the fuckheads around here seem to be neglecting is that, except for one year, Oregon has had top 20 recruiting classes and now has an S&C coach is SERIOUS about working them until their livers literally start bleeding. We also have a good QB again.

    Also too, the Civil War is in Autzen. Unless Taggart is a total piece of shit (losing record), we beat the Boovs in our place.

    I've never been an Oregon basher or hater at all. In fact, doogs who pretend like Oregon didn't have a historic run piss me off. I genuinely liked watching Oregon play.

    I really feel like Taggart is an idiot though. The snakes comment was cringe worthy. He already started the pr campaign about what a big rebuild it's going to take.
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    edited February 2017
    haie said:

    It was year one of Taggert, if you doogs haven't forgotten. You were all defending Pete year 1.

    I mean, I've been hearing for years now that Oregon will be back in their rightful place, like there isn't enough money to get this thing rolling again.

    I mean, this place claims it isn't the doog haven that it is, that's all I'm saying. You were all dooging when we stomped on you when you were down. I'll LIPO.

    It was year 3 for Andersen and year 1 for Taggert taking over that defense. Man this place has turned into a doog cesspool, that's all I'm saying.

    Excuse me while I fly up to Vancouver tonight to watch my other shit team get ceremoniously stomped by Boston.

    You make it sound like Oregon doesn't take football seriously. Another non-bowel year and Phil Knight will gay marry Chip Kelly and leave his money to him to come back.
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183

    AZDuck said:

    Oregon State does well when their coach's last name ends in "sen" or "son." So they should be improved this year.

    What most of the fuckheads around here seem to be neglecting is that, except for one year, Oregon has had top 20 recruiting classes and now has an S&C coach is SERIOUS about working them until their livers literally start bleeding. We also have a good QB again.

    Also too, the Civil War is in Autzen. Unless Taggart is a total piece of shit (losing record), we beat the Boovs in our place.

    I've never been an Oregon basher or hater at all. In fact, doogs who pretend like Oregon didn't have a historic run piss me off. I genuinely liked watching Oregon play.

    I really feel like Taggart is an idiot though. The snakes comment was cringe worthy. He already started the pr campaign about what a big rebuild it's going to take.
    Maybe. But he's an idiot that young, edgy black teenagers apparently want to play for. The question that remains is how does he use that talent?
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    0 to 3 wins in the worst Pac12 in years.

    Imagine how bad it would have to be for them to get to 6 wins. They'd have to sweep at home and win a road game. Then manage 2 OOC wins.

    Vegas here I come!!!!




  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited February 2017
    dnc said:

    0 to 3 wins in the worst Pac12 in years.

    Imagine how bad it would have to be for them to get to 6 wins. They'd have to sweep at home and win a road game. Then manage 2 OOC wins.

    Vegas here I come!!!!




    If you're talking about 2016 that's the QPOTY

    Pac teams in the final top 5:
    2015: 1
    2016: 2

    Pac teams in the final top 15:
    2015: 1
    2016: 3

    Pac teams in the final top 25:
    2015: 3
    2016: 5

    The only year since 2010 that's even close to as strong as 2016 was 2011 when we? had 3 top 10 teams but nobody else in the top 25. I didn't go back any further than that cause I'm lazy.

    Conclusion: The Pac always sucks, 2016 it sucked a little less.
    It was exceptionally poor this year. Record breaking, really.

    4 teams won 2 or fewer conf games. there is not another season to compare that to.



  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    dnc said:

    0 to 3 wins in the worst Pac12 in years.

    Imagine how bad it would have to be for them to get to 6 wins. They'd have to sweep at home and win a road game. Then manage 2 OOC wins.

    Vegas here I come!!!!




    If you're talking about 2016 that's the QPOTY

    Pac teams in the final top 5:
    2015: 1
    2016: 2

    Pac teams in the final top 15:
    2015: 1
    2016: 3

    Pac teams in the final top 25:
    2015: 3
    2016: 5

    The only year since 2010 that's even close to as strong as 2016 was 2011 when we? had 3 top 10 teams but nobody else in the top 25. I didn't go back any further than that cause I'm lazy.

    Conclusion: The Pac always sucks, 2016 it sucked a little less.
    4 teams won 2 or fewer conf games. theres not another season to compare that too.



    I like to judge the strength of the conference by the quality of the bottom four teams, TWILTD.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    0 to 3 wins in the worst Pac12 in years.

    Imagine how bad it would have to be for them to get to 6 wins. They'd have to sweep at home and win a road game. Then manage 2 OOC wins.

    Vegas here I come!!!!




    If you're talking about 2016 that's the QPOTY

    Pac teams in the final top 5:
    2015: 1
    2016: 2

    Pac teams in the final top 15:
    2015: 1
    2016: 3

    Pac teams in the final top 25:
    2015: 3
    2016: 5

    The only year since 2010 that's even close to as strong as 2016 was 2011 when we? had 3 top 10 teams but nobody else in the top 25. I didn't go back any further than that cause I'm lazy.

    Conclusion: The Pac always sucks, 2016 it sucked a little less.
    4 teams won 2 or fewer conf games. theres not another season to compare that too.



    I like to judge the strength of the conference by the quality of the bottom four teams, TWILTD.
    The historically bad bottom 25% of the league doesn't tell any of the story?

    Yeah ok.

    Happy new year btw.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited February 2017

    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    0 to 3 wins in the worst Pac12 in years.

    Imagine how bad it would have to be for them to get to 6 wins. They'd have to sweep at home and win a road game. Then manage 2 OOC wins.

    Vegas here I come!!!!




    If you're talking about 2016 that's the QPOTY

    Pac teams in the final top 5:
    2015: 1
    2016: 2

    Pac teams in the final top 15:
    2015: 1
    2016: 3

    Pac teams in the final top 25:
    2015: 3
    2016: 5

    The only year since 2010 that's even close to as strong as 2016 was 2011 when we? had 3 top 10 teams but nobody else in the top 25. I didn't go back any further than that cause I'm lazy.

    Conclusion: The Pac always sucks, 2016 it sucked a little less.
    4 teams won 2 or fewer conf games. theres not another season to compare that too.



    I like to judge the strength of the conference by the quality of the bottom four teams, TWILTD.
    The historically bad bottom 25% of the league doesn't tell any of the story?

    Yeah ok.

    Happy new year btw.
    I didn't say it doesn't tell any of it, it certainly doesn't overcome two top 4 teams and 5 in the top 25.

    The bottom of the league may have been the worst it's been in years (although 2008 says hi!). The league as a whole was not close to the worst it's been in years.

    Happy Black History Month.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited February 2017
    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    dnc said:

    0 to 3 wins in the worst Pac12 in years.

    Imagine how bad it would have to be for them to get to 6 wins. They'd have to sweep at home and win a road game. Then manage 2 OOC wins.

    Vegas here I come!!!!




    If you're talking about 2016 that's the QPOTY

    Pac teams in the final top 5:
    2015: 1
    2016: 2

    Pac teams in the final top 15:
    2015: 1
    2016: 3

    Pac teams in the final top 25:
    2015: 3
    2016: 5

    The only year since 2010 that's even close to as strong as 2016 was 2011 when we? had 3 top 10 teams but nobody else in the top 25. I didn't go back any further than that cause I'm lazy.

    Conclusion: The Pac always sucks, 2016 it sucked a little less.
    4 teams won 2 or fewer conf games. theres not another season to compare that too.



    I like to judge the strength of the conference by the quality of the bottom four teams, TWILTD.
    The historically bad bottom 25% of the league doesn't tell any of the story?

    Yeah ok.

    Happy new year btw.
    I didn't say it doesn't tell any of it, it certainly doesn't overcome two top 4 teams and 5 in the top 25.

    The bottom of the league may have been the worst it's been in years (although 2008 says hi!). The league as a whole was not close to the worst it's been in years.

    Happy Black History Month.
    It's not just the bottom. Only 6 teams qualified for a bowl game.

    Find the last time that happened.

    It was really, really dire last year. Even more than usual.