I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
I recall seeing some numbers several months back that indicate pharma companies spend significantly more on advertising than they do on R&D; the "we need to rape you on the drugs that work to pay for the drugs that don't" argument doesn't hold water.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
I recall seeing some numbers several months back that indicate pharma companies spend significantly more on advertising than they do on R&D; the "we need to rape you on the drugs that work to pay for the drugs that don't" argument doesn't hold water.
yes. they spend gobs on overhead and use it to justify their price gouging. We should either be allowed to negotiate with medicare or import from countries that do. We're allowed neither. Why? Cause the gov't is completely bought out
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
The bigger issue is that our country gets charged more for the same drugs as other countries.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
The bigger issue is that our country gets charged more for the same drugs as other countries.
There's truth in that. As I noted indirectly in my OXY and aspirin example. When an insurance company is involved, they charge way more.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
The bigger issue is that our country gets charged more for the same drugs as other countries.
There's truth in that. As I noted indirectly in my OXY and aspirin example. When an insurance company is involved, they charge way more.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
The bigger issue is that our country gets charged more for the same drugs as other countries.
There's truth in that. As I noted indirectly in my OXY and aspirin example. When an insurance company is involved, they charge way more.
So let's make everyone have to buy insurance
Great fucking plan
They charge so much because people without insurance don't pay causing everyone with insurance to pay too much. Are you really that dumb? Have you ever wondered why the cash price is half the insurance price?
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
The bigger issue is that our country gets charged more for the same drugs as other countries.
And Bannon/Trump have decided to continue this arrangement.
I'd like to see how much the drug companies are profiting per pill. If a company makes a billion dollars profit, but sells 20 billion pills, I can't see how they can afford to significantly lower prices. In that case, tax cuts and deregulation make sense if it gives them the breathing room necessary to make those cuts.
The issue with drugs. They invest in hundreds of drugs but only a few hit. So they have to pay for the losers from the winners, which makes it difficult to assess profitablity like that.
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
I recall seeing some numbers several months back that indicate pharma companies spend significantly more on advertising than they do on R&D; the "we need to rape you on the drugs that work to pay for the drugs that don't" argument doesn't hold water.
Years ago, I worked in sales and sales management for two different pharmaceutical companies. The pay and benefits were fantastic and the amount of actual work I did was negligible. The sales forces for big pharma are gigantic and add nothing to the quality or availability of health care. But I did make a shitload of money.
Comments
Unfortunately my dentist is trying to stop the oxy addiction plague and tells me to use advil. Fucker
That being said, charging $35 in the ER for one aspirin is dumb. But if you buy OXY, it costs $8 after insurance for a bottle but the pills go for $50 a pill in the black market.
We just wany to engage in juvenile name calling about that fake orange haired narcissistic sociopath...
I support this and all others efforts to kill off the Boomers.
Great fucking plan
And legalize cocaine, shrooms and weed while we're at it.
Get in line with TRUMP or LEAVE.