Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Bannon is the REAL President
Comments
-
Wait a minute.... Griffins aren't real????oregonblitzkrieg said:
Inclusive like Germany banning sausages in schools so as not to offend the pork hating moslems? Inclusive like the media and government of Sweden covering up murders and rapes committed by 'migrant' scum, while their leaders have gone on record saying that Sweden belongs to the immigrants, not to the Swedes? Is that inclusive enough?BearsWiin said:
I agree, they need to be more inclusive.PurpleJ said:
Looks like they're doing a shitty job.BearsWiin said:
Quite the contrary. He seems to think he has all the answers, while those who have spent their lives dealing with the nuances and complexities of shit like this just collectively have their thumbs up their asses.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
You seem very scared.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The issue extends beyond America. Some of us don't want America going down the same fucktarded path as Europe. HTH. Obama, Merkel, Cameron, Hollande, lots of work ahead to clean up their incompetence.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The only terrorist attack on North American soil this year was committed by a white Christian.PurpleJ said:Fear means the terrorists win, but sticking your head in the sand and pretending that Islam isn't a global problem is just silly. Putting it in the same bracket as other religions is ignorant.
Go on.
el-oh-el. A Turk will always be a fucking Turk, nothing more nothing less. If you and others want to pretend that Turks are seen as Germans, you're welcome to that delusion. It's like saying trannies are seen as real women. I understand that the regressive progressive movement championed by Berkeley lunatics would like us to believe in those fairytales. But it's easier to believe in Yetis, Griffins and Ouija boards.BearsWiin said:
And yet, somehow, all those Turks have assimilated just fine in Germany.oregonblitzkrieg said:
The problem has been defined and exposed in Europe. Islam can't coexist with the West and needs to stay in the Middle East. By and large the moslems do not assimilate, they hunker down in ghettoes like Molenbeek where they are free to hatch their dirty little terroristic plots because the nations that host these parasites are too weak willed and pc to purge them from their midst. They make no secret of their intention to conquer Europe by out-procreating the native populations and slowly instituting sharia law by taking advantage of western liberal culture that is too fucktarded to recognize the threat, and too pc to call it out. If Islam continues to push against the West and kill our citizens and invade our nations, it will awaken the monster and there will be hell to pay. The punishment will be so severe and extreme that the leaders of these medieval third world monkey nations will root out the extremists in their midst out of fear of what we will do to them if they don't. The complete and total destruction of Islam itself is the preferable outcome, but unfortunately that will never happen.AlCzervik said:
You've defined the problem.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Again, that's a good enough reason for me and half the nation.AlCzervik said:
Bannon is a paranoid nut job who wants to destroy Islam for reasons all his own.oregonblitzkrieg said:Bannon hates Islam and recognizes the threat that Muslim invasion... err immigration poses to the West. Thats good enough for me.
That's where the Turks in Germany are now; many were brought in after WWII to help rebuild the country as cheap labor, and they decided to stay. They weren't welcome, they had their own neighborhoods, and now they're seen as Germans. -
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
Just forget that no other nation had atomic weapons at the time.. I know they are awful people but christ a nuclear weapon? Hell no.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
And how would you suggest dealing with the global Islamic problem? They are not going to change by us being nice and inclusive and bending over backwards to accommodate them. Like the cuog said, arab muslims only respect the sword.backthepack said:
Just forget that no other nation had atomic weapons at the time.. I know they are awful people but christ a nuclear weapon? Hell no.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
No shit (thanks obama!) i think we need to continue air streaks, maybe put troops on the ground worst case, and target ISIS leadersoregonblitzkrieg said:
And how would you suggest dealing with the global Islamic problem? They are not going to change by us being nice and inclusive and bending over backwards to accommodate them. Like the cuog said, arab muslims only respect the sword.backthepack said:
Just forget that no other nation had atomic weapons at the time.. I know they are awful people but christ a nuclear weapon? Hell no.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
Isis is just one tentacle of the evil octopus that is Islam. Another one will crop up, and then another and another after ISIS is long gone, and it will keep repeating itself until the head of the beast is decapitated. The beast is Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent, the Ayatollahs in Iran.backthepack said:
No shit (thanks obama!) i think we need to continue air streaks, maybe put troops on the ground worst case, and target ISIS leadersoregonblitzkrieg said:
And how would you suggest dealing with the global Islamic problem? They are not going to change by us being nice and inclusive and bending over backwards to accommodate them. Like the cuog said, arab muslims only respect the sword.backthepack said:
Just forget that no other nation had atomic weapons at the time.. I know they are awful people but christ a nuclear weapon? Hell no.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
Agreed! But, i believe it isn't in a our interest to nuke the Saudis.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Isis is just one tentacle of the evil octopus that is Islam. Another one will crop up, and then another and another after ISIS is long gone, and it will keep repeating itself until the head of the beast is decapitated. The beast is Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent, the Ayatollahs in Iran.backthepack said:
No shit (thanks obama!) i think we need to continue air streaks, maybe put troops on the ground worst case, and target ISIS leadersoregonblitzkrieg said:
And how would you suggest dealing with the global Islamic problem? They are not going to change by us being nice and inclusive and bending over backwards to accommodate them. Like the cuog said, arab muslims only respect the sword.backthepack said:
Just forget that no other nation had atomic weapons at the time.. I know they are awful people but christ a nuclear weapon? Hell no.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
-
Sounds scary. No wonder you're terrified.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Isis is just one tentacle of the evil octopus that is Islam. Another one will crop up, and then another and another after ISIS is long gone, and it will keep repeating itself until the head of the beast is decapitated. The beast is Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent, the Ayatollahs in Iran.backthepack said:
No shit (thanks obama!) i think we need to continue air streaks, maybe put troops on the ground worst case, and target ISIS leadersoregonblitzkrieg said:
And how would you suggest dealing with the global Islamic problem? They are not going to change by us being nice and inclusive and bending over backwards to accommodate them. Like the cuog said, arab muslims only respect the sword.backthepack said:
Just forget that no other nation had atomic weapons at the time.. I know they are awful people but christ a nuclear weapon? Hell no.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended WW2. HTH. It's terrible, with a terrible cost, but it saved lives in the long run and brought the enemy to its knees in unconditional surrender. Saudi Arabia is the modern day Germany/Japan. The extremism originates from there. They create and export Wahhabi extremism. ISIS behaves exactly like the government of Saudi Arabia. They both stone women to death for being raped. They both allow men to kill their wives and daughters for ridiculous reasons without being punished. They both throw gays off buildings. They both amputate the hands of thieves. The problem will not be solved until we identify and attack the source.backthepack said:
Nukes? Are you FS!?!?! Jesus chirst that's exactly what we? need a nuclear fucking war! We'll all be dead!!! That's too radical..oregonblitzkrieg said:
That's the problem, the so called moderates won't denounce it because they tacitly agree with what ISIS is doing. Why? Because they are following the teachings of Islam to the letter. Islam itself is radical. Islam itself is the problem. They won't denounce ISIS or any other terrorist group until Islam itself is severely punished, until they are so devastated and afraid of us that they will bend over backwards to hunt down and eradicate their own extremists so that we don't punish them as a whole for not monitoring themselves. I'm talking about nuking Mecca like we had to nuke Hiroshima and Nagasaki, something along those lines, something that might be necessary to do in the future to show these animals that we mean business and that they better not ever, ever fuck with us again.backthepack said:Much of islam is fine but there are small radical segments who intepret the Quaran like they did in the 1500s.. it's hard to defeat a segment of an idelogy but you can contain it. ISIS isn't a huge threat to any cuntry currently because the vast majoritity of Islam isn't radical (obviously). However, the majoritity of muslim leaders haven't denounced ISIS which is a major issue which impeads Amercia's and Europe's ability to defeat ISIS.
