Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Thought for the day

245

Comments

  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    That's what you think. When you kill them they get to bang 70 virgins. That's some MAJOR terrorist seed hitting the hole!
  • DugtheDoog
    DugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    edited January 2017
    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Probably not. But what about launching countless proxy wars to destabilize countries and overthrow leaders everyone knows would be succeeded by a very moderate Muslim brotherhood type? Is that cool? What about arming al qaeda ISIS ISIL al nusra terrorists "moderate rebels" to do our bidding? Ordering 100,000 drone bombings in the region since 2010?

    All sounds on the up and up to me. We're doing Kissinger proud.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter

    I hear it (why there are so many terrorists) was because Jefferson sent the Marines to the shores of Tripoli to deal with those Barbary Coast assholes.

    You've apparently read your history. Aside from Hitchens, nobody in recent memory ever revived this salient point in all of these "Why" discussions.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,056 Standard Supporter
    AlCzervik said:

    2001400ex said:

    Race we agree for once. I do need to add that bombing Muslim countries doesn't help reduce the number of terrorists.

    Simple math tells me that killing terrorists reduces the number of terrorists
    The past 16 years say hi.
    So it all began in 2001. Good to know.
  • doogie
    doogie Member Posts: 15,072
    Q: if you get another thought today will you be posting it or saving it for tomorrow?
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    Q: if you get another thought today will you be posting it or saving it for tomorrow?

    The statement is rhetorical given Race got the thought from a FB meme.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,140 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Q: if you get another thought today will you be posting it or saving it for tomorrow?

    The statement is rhetorical given Race got the thought from a FB meme.
    You strike me as the kind of faggot who does facebook
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Q: if you get another thought today will you be posting it or saving it for tomorrow?

    The statement is rhetorical given Race got the thought from a FB meme.
    You strike me as the kind of faggot who does facebook
    Sorry, meant reddit. Or AOL boreds.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,140 Founders Club
    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Q: if you get another thought today will you be posting it or saving it for tomorrow?

    The statement is rhetorical given Race got the thought from a FB meme.
    You strike me as the kind of faggot who does facebook
    Sorry, meant reddit. Or AOL boreds.
    That kind of a fag too
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

    2001400ex said:

    2001400ex said:

    doogie said:

    Q: if you get another thought today will you be posting it or saving it for tomorrow?

    The statement is rhetorical given Race got the thought from a FB meme.
    You strike me as the kind of faggot who does facebook
    Sorry, meant reddit. Or AOL boreds.
    That kind of a fag too
    Don't judge on what type a fag someone is.