Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Breaking news...

2»

Comments

  • Options
    creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 22,741
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Photogenic

    PM to creepy sodbuster

    I'm not reading your novels any more than I'm reading Tequilla novels.

    Same for you AZ

    Get your shit together guys

    Get off my lawn Race Bannon! And quit calling me sodbuster! Farming is a noble and proud profession.
  • Options
    EwaDawgEwaDawg Member Posts: 3,992
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    AZDuck said:

    whlinder said:

    AZDuck said:



    Washington's football "history" is maybe two notches better than Oregon's, overall.

    How many notches was 1917 through 2000 1994 worth for us* against you*?
    Fixed that for you.

    UW = 16 Conference titles
    UO = 12 Conference titles

    Rose Bowl wins:

    UW = 7
    UO = 3

    BCS National Championship Appearances:

    UW = 0
    UO = 1

    National Championships:
    UW: 1 (2 claimed)
    UO: 0 (0 claimed)

    CFB Playoff Record:

    UW = 0/1
    UO = 1/1

    Heisman winners:

    UW = 0
    UO = 1

    Overall bowl record:

    UW: 18-18-1
    UO: 14-17

    The series record between the schools:

    59-45-5

    1900-1917:
    5-6-2 (UW)

    1918-1993:
    47-23-3 (UW)

    Of those, 38 games were played in Seattle, 16 in Eugene, and 20 in Portland.

    1994-2016:
    17-5 (UO)

    So yeah, that 73-year span where most of Oregon's "home" games were played in neutral site Portland made a difference. The comparison of games played in either Seattle or Eugene makes things interesting:

    Seattle: UW (25-11-2)
    Eugene: Tie (8-8)
    Portland: UW (14-5-1)

    Couple of notches seems about right.


    image
    You just disproved your fucking point you goddamn fucking moron.

    HTH
  • Options
    BennyBeaverBennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,333
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes First Comment 5 Up Votes
    1994-2016:
    17-5 (UO)

    We all know that college football started in 94. You could have just typed that.
  • Options
    RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 101,258
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam

    1994-2016:
    17-5 (UO)

    We all know that college football started in 94. You could have just typed that.

    Yeah but if you take away 12 in a row it's 5 to 5
  • Options
    oregonblitzkriegoregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes First Comment
    AZDuck said:

    whlinder said:

    AZDuck said:



    Washington's football "history" is maybe two notches better than Oregon's, overall.

    How many notches was 1917 through 2000 1994 worth for us* against you*?
    Fixed that for you.

    UW = 16 Conference titles
    UO = 12 Conference titles

    Rose Bowl wins:

    UW = 7
    UO = 3

    BCS National Championship Appearances:

    UW = 0
    UO = 1

    National Championships:
    UW: 1 (2 claimed)
    UO: 0 (0 claimed)

    CFB Playoff Record:

    UW = 0/1
    UO = 1/1

    Heisman winners:

    UW = 0
    UO = 1

    Overall bowl record:

    UW: 18-18-1
    UO: 14-17

    The series record between the schools:

    59-45-5

    1900-1917:
    5-6-2 (UW)

    1918-1993:
    47-23-3 (UW)

    Of those, 38 games were played in Seattle, 16 in Eugene, and 20 in Portland.

    1994-2016:
    17-5 (UO)

    So yeah, that 73-year span where most of Oregon's "home" games were played in neutral site Portland made a difference. The comparison of games played in either Seattle or Eugene makes things interesting:

    Seattle: UW (25-11-2)
    Eugene: Tie (8-8)
    Portland: UW (14-5-1)

    Couple of notches seems about right.


    image
    Flagged for not including our 2015 participation trophy.
Sign In or Register to comment.