PM to the libs

doogie

2001400ex said:

I thought Obama supported Muslims. He would never bomb them.

But he sure did bomb them he'll out of Syrian Christians

jecornel

ThomasFremont said:

jecornel said:

Your peace and all loving president dropped 26,000 bombs in 2016.

What a guy!

And?

That's a lot of fucking bombs.

BennyBeaver

jecornel said:

ThomasFremont said:

jecornel said:

Your peace and all loving president dropped 26,000 bombs in 2016.

What a guy!

And?

That's a lot of fucking bombs.

They're small though.

ThomasFremont

jecornel said:

ThomasFremont said:

jecornel said:

Your peace and all loving president dropped 26,000 bombs in 2016.

What a guy!

And?

That's a lot of fucking bombs.

Relative to what?

DugtheDoog

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

dhdawg

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Hippopeteamus

dhdawg said:

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Eisenhower also warned in that speech about the dangers of the scientific-technological elite, which also influences our politics.

2001400ex

dhdawg said:

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Let's cut taxes on the wealthy and increase military spending. Not only will the increased spending create peace, we will have millions of new jobs and balanced budget.

doogie

So, you got a job with Chuck Schumer I see

BennyBeaver

2001400ex said:

dhdawg said:

DugtheDoog said:

dhdawg said:

This is why the "obama is weak" criticism is so stupid. He's basically George Bush lite on foreign policy. Not a progressive

Obama isn't Bush-lite. He extended the wars we were already in, entrenched us further into a global, faceless war that can be fought any time anywhere without Congress, essentially funded and armed to the teeth al Qaeda ISIS the freedom fighters knowing the general public is too stupid to put 2:2 together. Obubba props up Islamic militants in hopes to overthrow Assad and almost overnight declare war against our country and call themselves ISIS. It's a joke. And the reason Obubba isn't Bush-lite is because other than some insignificant meaningless details that they distract us over (tranny bathrooms, etc), they are 2 sides to the same coin. No matter which party holds the white house, they're still controlled like little puppets to keep the war machine clicking on all cylinders, prop up big banks, move us closer to globalism and benefit corporate interests. When it comes to these things, all establishment candidates are lockstep with each other.

Obama's foreign policy sucks. but it's basically soft imperialism. Needless bombings, special ops, drones, etc.
Bush declared 2 all out ground wars, that's far worse.

Eisenhower actually had a great speech about the dangers of the "military industrial complex" that now owns our gov't

Let's cut taxes on the wealthy and increase military spending. Not only will the increased spending create peace, we will have millions of new jobs and balanced budget.

How can this not work? Fucking genius plan.