Trump taps Kennedy Jr. to lead commission on "vaccine safety and scientific integrity"
based on that absurd tweet from 2 and a half years ago, I'm sure this investigation won't be at all compromised.
Comments
-
We don't need science. Anecdotal evidence from a 2 year old suddenly getting autism is all the information we need.
-
More fake news. You know that, right?
-
I'll wait until our resident vaccine and measles expert weighs in.... @pawz, true??
-
Autism is a hoax invented by the Chinese.
-
Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed. -
I'm no expert.MisterEm said:I'll wait until our resident vaccine and measles expert weighs in.... @pawz, true??
I just acknowledge there is too much money on one side of the issue to ever get an honest trial.
It's not my fault the lack of an honest trial creates doubt.
Take all the screenshots you need.
NFM
-
Just like global warming is a hoax by American scientists to enhance their grant funding.pawz said:
I'm no expert.MisterEm said:I'll wait until our resident vaccine and measles expert weighs in.... @pawz, true??
I just acknowledge there is too much money on one side of the issue to ever get an honest trial.
It's not my fault the lack of an honest trial creates doubt.
Take all the screenshots you need.
NFM -
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed. -
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
If vaccines are creating symptoms, that's VERY profitable.
HTH -
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH -
Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?UWhuskytskeet said:
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH
That's what i thought.
Exponential growth is profitable. -
It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.pawz said:
Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?UWhuskytskeet said:
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH
That's what i thought.
Exponential growth is profitable.
Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50? -
Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.UWhuskytskeet said:
It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.pawz said:
Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?UWhuskytskeet said:
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH
That's what i thought.
Exponential growth is profitable.
Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?
Or you could answer the original question fucko. -
It's not a logical leap, it's a fact of life. You will get some form of cancer if you live long enough.pawz said:
Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.UWhuskytskeet said:
It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.pawz said:
Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?UWhuskytskeet said:
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH
That's what i thought.
Exponential growth is profitable.
Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?
Or you could answer the original question fucko."A century ago average life expectancy at birth was in the low to mid-50s. Now it is almost 79, and if you make it to 65 you’re likely to live into your mid-80s. The median age of cancer death is 72. We live long enough for it to get us."
...
As people age their cells amass more potentially cancerous mutations. Given a long enough life, cancer will eventually kill you — unless you die first of something else. That would be true even in a world free from carcinogens and equipped with the most powerful medical technology. -
Maybe you should just kill yourself for being so fucking stupid.pawz said:
Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.UWhuskytskeet said:
It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.pawz said:
Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?UWhuskytskeet said:
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH
That's what i thought.
Exponential growth is profitable.
Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?
Or you could answer the original question fucko.
-
Good solution. That way pawz wont get the cancer.dflea said:
Maybe you should just kill yourself for being so fucking stupid.pawz said:
Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.UWhuskytskeet said:
It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.pawz said:
Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?UWhuskytskeet said:
Since when has cancer been preventable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
HTH
That's what i thought.
Exponential growth is profitable.
Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?
Or you could answer the original question fucko. -
How is treating autism profitable?pawz said:
Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.UWhuskytskeet said:
Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?pawz said:Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.
Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.
If vaccines are creating symptoms, that's VERY profitable.
HTH
