Trump taps Kennedy Jr. to lead commission on "vaccine safety and scientific integrity"

dhdawg

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/10/politics/robert-f-kennedy-jr-donald-trump-vaccine-commission/index.html

based on that absurd tweet from 2 and a half years ago, I'm sure this investigation won't be at all compromised.

2001400ex

We don't need science. Anecdotal evidence from a 2 year old suddenly getting autism is all the information we need.

doogie

More fake news. You know that, right?

MisterEm

I'll wait until our resident vaccine and measles expert weighs in.... @pawz, true??

allpurpleallgold

Autism is a hoax invented by the Chinese.

pawz

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

pawz

MisterEm said:

I'll wait until our resident vaccine and measles expert weighs in.... @pawz, true??

I'm no expert.

I just acknowledge there is too much money on one side of the issue to ever get an honest trial.

It's not my fault the lack of an honest trial creates doubt.



Take all the screenshots you need.

NFM

2001400ex

pawz said:

MisterEm said:

I'll wait until our resident vaccine and measles expert weighs in.... @pawz, true??

I'm no expert.

I just acknowledge there is too much money on one side of the issue to ever get an honest trial.

It's not my fault the lack of an honest trial creates doubt.



Take all the screenshots you need.

NFM

Just like global warming is a hoax by American scientists to enhance their grant funding.

UWhuskytskeet

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

pawz

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.

If vaccines are creating symptoms, that's VERY profitable.



HTH

UWhuskytskeet

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

pawz

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?


That's what i thought.

















Exponential growth is profitable.

UWhuskytskeet

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?


That's what i thought.



Exponential growth is profitable.

It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.



Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?

pawz

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?


That's what i thought.



Exponential growth is profitable.

It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.



Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?

Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.

Or you could answer the original question fucko.

UWhuskytskeet

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?


That's what i thought.



Exponential growth is profitable.

It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.



Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?

Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.

Or you could answer the original question fucko.

It's not a logical leap, it's a fact of life. You will get some form of cancer if you live long enough.

"A century ago average life expectancy at birth was in the low to mid-50s. Now it is almost 79, and if you make it to 65 you’re likely to live into your mid-80s. The median age of cancer death is 72. We live long enough for it to get us."

...

As people age their cells amass more potentially cancerous mutations. Given a long enough life, cancer will eventually kill you — unless you die first of something else. That would be true even in a world free from carcinogens and equipped with the most powerful medical technology.

dflea

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?


That's what i thought.



Exponential growth is profitable.

It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.



Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?

Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.

Or you could answer the original question fucko.

Maybe you should just kill yourself for being so fucking stupid.

BennyBeaver

dflea said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.


HTH

Since when has cancer been preventable?

Do you know what the cancer rates were in society prior to the modern age?


That's what i thought.



Exponential growth is profitable.

It's almost as if people that live long enough will eventually get cancer.



Are you really surprised to find out that there were lower cancer rates when the life expectancy was 50?

Nice logical leap as always. Maybe we should all just light ourselves on fire at 50.

Or you could answer the original question fucko.

Maybe you should just kill yourself for being so fucking stupid.

Good solution. That way pawz wont get the cancer.

2001400ex

pawz said:

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

Another Kennedy that end will up dead before his time. Due to a 'tragic accident' be sure.

Too much money in the industry to take chances. Hypocratic oath indeed.

Curious what you think would happen if a cancer vaccine was available. Do you really think vaccines are more profitable than treating symptoms?

Cancer is preventable. But that's not profitable.

If vaccines are creating symptoms, that's VERY profitable.



HTH

How is treating autism profitable?