Huskies were the latest interloper in college football

DerekJohnson

thecomeback.com/ncaa/washington-huskies-latest-interloper-to-fall-short-vs-college-footballs-powers.html

oregonblitzkrieg

"The Tide decided not to over exert themselves." lol

MisterEm

oregonblitzkrieg said:

"The Tide decided not to over exert themselves." lol

Sounds like Hoke's defensive strategy.

oregonblitzkrieg

MisterEm said:

oregonblitzkrieg said:

"The Tide decided not to over exert themselves." lol

Sounds like Hoke's defensive strategy.

Coach Fag and coach Pimp will make it all better.

YellowSnow

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

I'm torn. Do I go with a "thanks Taft" or a "the comeback is your source?"

MisterEm

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

I'm torn. Do I go with a "thanks Taft" or a "the comeback is your source?"

You knew here?

A-fucking-bundance.

Southerndawg

YellowSnow said:

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

A 16 year hiatus from national relevance with an 0-12 season along the way makes them an interloper until proven otherwise. It's going to take UW elevating its game beyond being tallest midget. UW gets its mojo back when it starts winning big games again. Beat USC when they matter, beat Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, et al when they matter and in meaningful bowl games. They've been there before, and could be again, we'll see.

tenndawg

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

PLUNGE USC when they matter, PRISON RAPE Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, et al when they matter and MAKE THEM LICK OUT PIG ASSHOLES in meaningful bowl games. They've been there before, and could be again, we'll see.

I stood on the shoulders of giants to improve the quote

YellowSnow

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

A 16 year hiatus from national relevance with an 0-12 season along the way makes them an interloper until proven otherwise. It's going to take UW elevating its game beyond being tallest midget. UW gets its mojo back when it starts winning big games again. Beat USC when they matter, beat Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, et al when they matter and in meaningful bowl games. They've been there before, and could be again, we'll see.

I agree on currently being an interloper from basically 2001 on when the descent irrelevance began, and that we have to win a big time bowl game against an elite program to remove the label. I just found it odd that in 2000 the author of this piece would have considered us an interloper, when at that point in history - despite the mediocrity of the Lambo era - we were still considered a nationally relevant, big time program.

MisterEm

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

A 16 year hiatus from national relevance with an 0-12 season along the way makes them an interloper until proven otherwise. It's going to take UW elevating its game beyond being tallest midget. UW gets its mojo back when it starts winning big games again. Beat USC when they matter, beat Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, et al when they matter and in meaningful bowl games. They've been there before, and could be again, we'll see.

I agree on currently being an interloper from basically 2001 on when the descent irrelevance began, and that we have to win a big time bowl game against an elite program to remove the label. I just found it odd that in 2000 the author of this piece would have considered us an interloper, when at that point in history - despite the mediocrity of the Lambo era - we were still considered a nationally relevant, big time program.

Quit thinking.

When the Arrogance is truly back, you can remove the interloper tag.

oregonblitzkrieg

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

A 16 year hiatus from national relevance with an 0-12 season along the way makes them an interloper until proven otherwise. It's going to take UW elevating its game beyond being tallest midget. UW gets its mojo back when it starts winning big games again. Beat USC when they matter, beat Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, et al when they matter and in meaningful bowl games. They've been there before, and could be again, we'll see.

I agree on currently being an interloper from basically 2001 on when the descent irrelevance began, and that we have to win a big time bowl game against an elite program to remove the label. I just found it odd that in 2000 the author of this piece would have considered us an interloper, when at that point in history - despite the mediocrity of the Lambo era - we were still considered a nationally relevant, big time program.

Southerndawg

MisterEm said:

YellowSnow said:

Southerndawg said:

YellowSnow said:

When did we officially become an "Interloper"? Would we have been considered as such in 2000 had their been a CFP? Seems like in the mid to late 90's we would have still been a Blue Blood, elite program, based on what had been achieved in the prior 20 years- i.e., 6 Rose Bowls and 1 Orange.

A 16 year hiatus from national relevance with an 0-12 season along the way makes them an interloper until proven otherwise. It's going to take UW elevating its game beyond being tallest midget. UW gets its mojo back when it starts winning big games again. Beat USC when they matter, beat Oklahoma, Ohio State, Michigan, et al when they matter and in meaningful bowl games. They've been there before, and could be again, we'll see.

I agree on currently being an interloper from basically 2001 on when the descent irrelevance began, and that we have to win a big time bowl game against an elite program to remove the label. I just found it odd that in 2000 the author of this piece would have considered us an interloper, when at that point in history - despite the mediocrity of the Lambo era - we were still considered a nationally relevant, big time program.

Quit thinking.

When the Justified Arrogance is truly back, you can remove the interloper tag.