So Browning is a sophomore

He improved a ton this year over last year. He still has lots of room to improve. Hopefully he can make that similar jump next year and perform well against the good defenses we face.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

If the problem were his skill, then I would agree.

The problem is he is one of the biggest chokers I've ever seen and he's done it literally since his first game here.

The problem is mental.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

While every doog in doog-land is busy saying Jake Browning is good because he's our hero for lighting up shitty teams (and they ignore that he folds under any pressure whatsoever) - it should be recognized what he did after the first series yesterday.

He started 11 for 13 and ended up 20 for 38.

His raw QBRs against the four best Ds we've faced have been:

Utah - 65.7
USC - 30.4
Colorado - 24.1
Bama - 17.6

His raw QBRs against the rest of everyone? 87.5

He's basically Colt Brennan who chokes.

It's sad because I really like him for many reasons, but at this point he is who he is.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

While every doog in doog-land is busy saying Jake Browning is good because he's our hero for lighting up shitty teams (and they ignore that he folds under any pressure whatsoever) - it should be recognized what he did after the first series yesterday.

He started 11 for 13 and ended up 20 for 38.

His raw QBRs against the four best Ds we've faced have been:

Utah - 65.7
USC - 30.4
Colorado - 24.1
Bama - 17.6

His raw QBRs against the rest of everyone? 87.5

He's basically Colt Brennan who chokes.

It's sad because I really like him for many reasons, but at this point he is who he is.

I called you a brilliant cripple. Pretty clever eh?

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

While every doog in doog-land is busy saying Jake Browning is good because he's our hero for lighting up shitty teams (and they ignore that he folds under any pressure whatsoever) - it should be recognized what he did after the first series yesterday.

He started 11 for 13 and ended up 20 for 38.

His raw QBRs against the four best Ds we've faced have been:

Utah - 65.7
USC - 30.4
Colorado - 24.1
Bama - 17.6

His raw QBRs against the rest of everyone? 87.5

He's basically Colt Brennan who chokes.

It's sad because I really like him for many reasons, but at this point he is who he is.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

While every doog in doog-land is busy saying Jake Browning is good because he's our hero for lighting up shitty teams (and they ignore that he folds under any pressure whatsoever) - it should be recognized what he did after the first series yesterday.

He started 11 for 13 and ended up 20 for 38.

His raw QBRs against the four best Ds we've faced have been:

Utah - 65.7
USC - 30.4
Colorado - 24.1
Bama - 17.6

His raw QBRs against the rest of everyone? 87.5

He's basically Colt Brennan who chokes.

It's sad because I really like him for many reasons, but at this point he is who he is.

I called you a brilliant cripple. Pretty clever eh?

Also - I should add that while going 9 for 25 after the opening drive, he also killed us by throwing a pick 6 right before half.

I said to Greg immediately prior to that play, "all we need is no turnovers here. 10-7 at half will be a victory for us."

The only real chance with Jake is to recognize him as a game-manager and get better protection for him.

However, his INT vs. Utah that changed that game wasn't a product of pressure. He had time. It was just a critical moment and he instinctively fucked the pooch.</blockquote>

I think pretty much all of us were sitting there thinking just run the ball, protect the 10-7 score, and get to the locker room for adjustments. When he threw the pick I screamed at the jumbotron in the Ceasar's sportsbook so loud the hot bartender jumped. Lucky for me she just brought more booze instead of removing me. You can get away with anything in Vegas.

Since the road to excess leads to the palace if wisdom, let me be the first to suggest that the best thing that can happen to Browning is spending a week in Vegas with Swaye.

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

While every doog in doog-land is busy saying Jake Browning is good because he's our hero for lighting up shitty teams (and they ignore that he folds under any pressure whatsoever) - it should be recognized what he did after the first series yesterday.

He started 11 for 13 and ended up 20 for 38.

His raw QBRs against the four best Ds we've faced have been:

Utah - 65.7
USC - 30.4
Colorado - 24.1
Bama - 17.6

His raw QBRs against the rest of everyone? 87.5

He's basically Colt Brennan who chokes.

It's sad because I really like him for many reasons, but at this point he is who he is.

I called you a brilliant cripple. Pretty clever eh?

Also - I should add that while going 9 for 25 after the opening drive, he also killed us by throwing a pick 6 right before half.

I said to Greg immediately prior to that play, "all we need is no turnovers here. 10-7 at half will be a victory for us."

The only real chance with Jake is to recognize him as a game-manager and get better protection for him.

However, his INT vs. Utah that changed that game wasn't a product of pressure. He had time. It was just a critical moment and he instinctively fucked the pooch.</blockquote>

I think pretty much all of us were sitting there thinking just run the ball, protect the 10-7 score, and get to the locker room for adjustments. When he threw the pick I screamed at the jumbotron in the Ceasar's sportsbook so loud the hot bartender jumped. Lucky for me she just brought more booze instead of removing me. You can get away with anything in Vegas.

When he threw the pick 6 the old Race Bannon emerged. I was blind with rage.

I am taking perspective on this loss but I am actually still pissed we lost. First time in a long time.

I would have beat him to death with my bare hands.

Fuck perspective. From here on out win or die

With this staff, assuming *any* second-year player won't continue to improve is FS. Especially a guy who works as hard as Browning.

Browning wasn't great in the Peach Bowl, obviously. He made one clearly disastrous decision, and missed on plenty of other throws. But after all the Brownsockery in November, I really feared he'd come out looking like a deer in headlights against Bammer. He didn't. The moment wasn't too big for him. He was merely imperfect.

Browning is never gonna be Vince Young. But he's a pretty deadly weapon already, and he's only been on campus two years. Also, he will never face another college D as dominant as that one -- not even when UW rematches with Bammer next year.

CHRIST.

He was Jack Lockner bad yesterday.

He wasn't good, but Jack H Lockner went 4 for 20 against a fucking Bo Pelini coached team in Husky stadium. A team he would beat 4 months later in the Holiday Bowl. How Locker got drafted as high as he did is a mystery.

I know youre being sarcastic, but still

I meant Jack Lockner overall, not THAT Nebraska game.

Here's an interesting thought...I wonder what Lockner would be able to do as a college qb with a team and coach this good.

While every doog in doog-land is busy saying Jake Browning is good because he's our hero for lighting up shitty teams (and they ignore that he folds under any pressure whatsoever) - it should be recognized what he did after the first series yesterday.

He started 11 for 13 and ended up 20 for 38.

His raw QBRs against the four best Ds we've faced have been:

Utah - 65.7
USC - 30.4
Colorado - 24.1
Bama - 17.6

His raw QBRs against the rest of everyone? 87.5

He's basically Colt Brennan who chokes.

It's sad because I really like him for many reasons, but at this point he is who he is.

I called you a brilliant cripple. Pretty clever eh?

Also - I should add that while going 9 for 25 after the opening drive, he also killed us by throwing a pick 6 right before half.

I said to Greg immediately prior to that play, "all we need is no turnovers here. 10-7 at half will be a victory for us."

The only real chance with Jake is to recognize him as a game-manager and get better protection for him.

However, his INT vs. Utah that changed that game wasn't a product of pressure. He had time. It was just a critical moment and he instinctively fucked the pooch.</blockquote>

I think pretty much all of us were sitting there thinking just run the ball, protect the 10-7 score, and get to the locker room for adjustments. When he threw the pick I screamed at the jumbotron in the Ceasar's sportsbook so loud the hot bartender jumped. Lucky for me she just brought more booze instead of removing me. You can get away with anything in Vegas.

When he threw the pick 6 the old Race Bannon emerged. I was blind with rage.

I am taking perspective on this loss but I am actually still pissed we lost. First time in a long time.

I would have beat him to death with my bare hands.

Fuck perspective. From here on out win or die

I'm hard as a diamond in an ice storm right now.