Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Question for the Sark is a great recruiter crowd
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
[Deleted User]
Posts: 11,453
So I've heard for years how Sark is a great recruiter everyone says so blah blah blah.
So why is Oregon still boat racing UW in Sark's 5th year? I keep hearing Doogs say "Look we just aren't on their level yet. We are getting there but they are just on another level".
Why is that? I mean Sark has been here for five years. I could maybe buy that excuse in year two but not in year five. These are all his guys other than Price.
So either Sark isn't a great recruiter like everyone claims or he is shitty at developing talent. It's one or the other.
BTW not that scout rankings are the be all end all but here it goes.
2010:
Oregon- 13
UW- 11
2011:
Oregon- 13
UW- 22
2012:
Oregon- 15
UW- 23
2013:
Oregon- 17
UW- 13
So Oregon has slightly out recruited UW but it's not a huge margin. I know why our media won't ask this question but it's frustrating why they don't bring up how lack of player development is a huge problem at Washington.
Josh Shirley is basically a non factor this year as a junior. ASJ and Kasen aren't these 5 star studs like we thought we were getting. There isn't one OL in year five that you can say without a doubt this guy is going to play on Sunday's.
It just pisses me off these fucks accept that "Oh well, Oregon is more talented than we are" while not asking why is that in year five?!!
So why is Oregon still boat racing UW in Sark's 5th year? I keep hearing Doogs say "Look we just aren't on their level yet. We are getting there but they are just on another level".
Why is that? I mean Sark has been here for five years. I could maybe buy that excuse in year two but not in year five. These are all his guys other than Price.
So either Sark isn't a great recruiter like everyone claims or he is shitty at developing talent. It's one or the other.
BTW not that scout rankings are the be all end all but here it goes.
2010:
Oregon- 13
UW- 11
2011:
Oregon- 13
UW- 22
2012:
Oregon- 15
UW- 23
2013:
Oregon- 17
UW- 13
So Oregon has slightly out recruited UW but it's not a huge margin. I know why our media won't ask this question but it's frustrating why they don't bring up how lack of player development is a huge problem at Washington.
Josh Shirley is basically a non factor this year as a junior. ASJ and Kasen aren't these 5 star studs like we thought we were getting. There isn't one OL in year five that you can say without a doubt this guy is going to play on Sunday's.
It just pisses me off these fucks accept that "Oh well, Oregon is more talented than we are" while not asking why is that in year five?!!
Comments
This topic is NEVER fucking addressed though ever. Bring it up with Doogs and they dodge this topic all together or give some bullshit how the talent is there then name drop all our skill players while not realizing not one lineman is NFL besides Danny Shelton.
As much as I pray for Autism Stadium to be bombed, ever since that Boise State game, Oregon has been a f****** machine. Only Ohio St, Auburn, Stanford, LSU, And a couple others tripped them up. They never blow games to inferior opponents. They never beat themselves. It's like the Patriots of cfb.
Recruiting Rankings
UW UO
2010 11 13
2011 22 13
2012 23 15
2013 13 17
Avg 17.25 14.5
The biggest difference during that time:
Offensive and defensive line 4-5 star recruits: UW = 7, UO = 15.
Offensive and defensive line 2 star recruits: UW = 8, UO = 1
Plus a bulk of those 4-5 star recruits on the line have all busted like Kohler, Hatchie, Potoe, etc.
Don't post this common sense over on Doogman though. Kim will have a Mexico beach's amount of sand in his cunt and Ektard will tell you that Sark is trying REALLY, REALLY hard to get linemen.
Who the fuck rates their closing success on 'offers'? The doogiest of doogs or just shitty salesmen? I am not in sales but I will go out on a limb and say that sales managers could give a flying f how many offers their staff makes- its about closing. Shart is not a closer. Period.
Be.
Closing.
The difference is Oregon has stocked up on the lines. They have talent and depth at the most important spots. Their DL does not get tired, they have back ups who are talented players. An injury or two doesn't derail them like it would do us. Year after year, we never fix the issue. How can we complain though, Sark offers more lineman than any other position. He's trying really hard guys.