Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Sometime in the off-season we will have some open discussions about the future and where we're going
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Sometime in the off-season we will have some open discussions about the future and where we're going
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Hey econ 101, thought there was no such thing as a free lunch? Puppy gets one. My donation is the many hits my threads bring.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
so why would i donate if they don't?
I donate to Meals on Wheels and I've yet to eat one of their shitty dinners.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
so why would i donate if they don't?
I would hope it's because you want to help fund the website.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Hey econ 101, thought there was no such thing as a free lunch? Puppy gets one. My donation is the many hits my threads bring.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
Every other website that I waste my worthless time on has figured out how to monetize my desperate refreshing. Derek can too.
The subscription model is a death knell especially for a website built primarily on communty interactions rather than original content.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
I was good with your link until I hit this shit ...
Now, suppose that all able members contribute to the public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex-ante payoff is given by q (v − c) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u where α ≡ (1 − q) N−1 is the probability that there are no other able members in the group. Suppose next that no able member contributes to a public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex ante payoff is qw. We make the following assumption which ensures that it is ex ante socially preferable that all able members contribute to a public good production. Assumption 1 q (v − c − w) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u ≥ 0.
Look, the way I feel is that there are enough donating posters that we have a foundation. It's at the point where non donaters are free riders (Econ 101 superiority guy here), ruining the bored and I'm subsidizing them. I believe the football and recruiting boreds should be subscriber only.
A lot of non donators are good posters. If they were denied posting privileges, it would decrease the entertainment value, which in turn might make people not want to donate.
I was good with your link until I hit this shit ...
Now, suppose that all able members contribute to the public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex-ante payoff is given by q (v − c) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u where α ≡ (1 − q) N−1 is the probability that there are no other able members in the group. Suppose next that no able member contributes to a public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex ante payoff is qw. We make the following assumption which ensures that it is ex ante socially preferable that all able members contribute to a public good production. Assumption 1 q (v − c − w) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u ≥ 0.
I just don't get it. I'm a 20-something alcoholic with terrible spending habits and I was able to pony up for the wigwam. Can't be hard for all you old, rich, and white fucks to give 20 bucks.
@DerekJohnson Maybe couple your books with a donation in certain packages? Donate X amount and receive X book on the house. You get to move some units while people can support the site AND get something of value.
I realize saying i'm a drunk person with terrible spending habits is probably why I donated to wigwam levels and why you frugal old fucks have money, but still...
Comments
The subscription model is a death knell especially for a website built primarily on communty interactions rather than original content.
Just ask Scout
Now, suppose that all able members contribute to the public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex-ante payoff
is given by q (v − c) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u where α ≡ (1 − q) N−1
is the probability that there are no other able members in the group. Suppose next that no able member contributes to a public good provision. Then the member’s individual one-period ex ante payoff is qw. We make the following assumption which ensures that it is ex ante socially preferable that all able members contribute to a public good production.
Assumption 1 q (v − c − w) + (1 − q) (1 − α) u ≥ 0.
@DerekJohnson Maybe couple your books with a donation in certain packages? Donate X amount and receive X book on the house. You get to move some units while people can support the site AND get something of value.