The dailymail is a British tabloid dialed in to US politics, everyone says so.
In your shit logic thread you linked an article to them about a disgraced former British diplomat who claimed WikiLeaks got their info from a disgruntled DNC worker who was out to get the Clintons, which provided no evidentiary proof whatsoever.
Yeah that's probably way more credible than the primary source documentation and on the record accounts contained in the NYT's reporting on Russian hacking.
Are you two claiming the guy the NY Times paraded out there isn't a lying sack of shit 9-11 faker?
Or are you just adding fake posts to the fake news?
I've never said I was smart. Just smarter than you
I like to think that the editorial section and the newsroom have the same journalistic responsibilities, it's what I like to do.
If he is a fraud then ok, it was a mistake to print it. The dailymail didn't provide much proof to back up its claim. I'll wait and see what the NYT response is.
Comments
And electors that aren't following the state vote, while entirely within the Constitution, are FS.
In your shit logic thread you linked an article to them about a disgraced former British diplomat who claimed WikiLeaks got their info from a disgruntled DNC worker who was out to get the Clintons, which provided no evidentiary proof whatsoever.
Yeah that's probably way more credible than the primary source documentation and on the record accounts contained in the NYT's reporting on Russian hacking.
How did you become this fucking dumb?
Or are you just adding fake posts to the fake news?
I've never said I was smart. Just smarter than you
If he is a fraud then ok, it was a mistake to print it. The dailymail didn't provide much proof to back up its claim. I'll wait and see what the NYT response is.
But an op-ed isn't fake news, dumbass.
In other words
I was right