Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Foster Sarell to UW: Yes or No?

11617182022

Comments

  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    The worst part is it's stanford.

    If it's bama, I'd still hate it, but understand it.

    That "fanbase" doesn't deserve the success they get, nor the top recruits that nobody even knows about until they are juniors.
    Screw that program, I hope we kick their and sarrell's asses.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    edited January 2017

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    remember when the people blaming cozzetto for shitty oline recruiting were mocked by this board? this is on petersen, something clearly isn't working.

    Even if Sarrell was NEVER coming to UW, which I tend to believe, this is a pattern and needs to change in 2018
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    edited January 2017

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
    Set your alarm for 2018 or 2019- whenever Adams and McGary leave.

    At this point it is highly unlikely we will be able to replace them without a big dropoff. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that.
  • CuntWaffle
    CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
    Set your alarm for 2018 or 2019- whenever Adams and McGary leave.

    At this point it is highly unlikely we will be able to replace them without a big dropoff. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that.
    Jeepers! Alarm set!
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,581

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
    Set your alarm for 2018 or 2019- whenever Adams and McGary leave.

    At this point it is highly unlikely we will be able to replace them without a big dropoff. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that.
    So you've already written off all our RS-SO, RS-FR, and incoming guys as busts?
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
    Set your alarm for 2018 or 2019- whenever Adams and McGary leave.

    At this point it is highly unlikely we will be able to replace them without a big dropoff. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that.
    So you've already written off all our RS-SO, RS-FR, and incoming guys as busts?
    We got shit ton of guards, in the pipeline but no many true tackles. Hilbers and burleson are the only ones i can think of
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
    Set your alarm for 2018 or 2019- whenever Adams and McGary leave.

    At this point it is highly unlikely we will be able to replace them without a big dropoff. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that.
    So you've already written off all our RS-SO, RS-FR, and incoming guys as busts?
    We got shit ton of guards, in the pipeline but no many true tackles. Hilbers and burleson are the only ones i can think of
    Yes exactly.