Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Foster Sarell to UW: Yes or No?

11617192122

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSe
    NeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,996
    Ruth watching Hardcore Husky , crystals balls to Stanford today
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    I'm ready to strangle somebody over sarrell leaving the state. There have been far too many of these stories. I'd like to strangle fozzy.

    But I am torn about Strausser. He is one hell of a coach, but he forces himself to coach average players because his recruiting abilities are so bad.

    In the end I think Petersen has a great eye for coaches and I see how much he defends strausser. Gotta give Pete the benefit of the doubt with strausser. He's earned it.

    But this kinda shit better end soon.
  • guntlove
    guntlove Member Posts: 784

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    You mean like John Turner? And Matt James? And Jesse Sossebee? And Shane Brostek?
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (faggy winky face).

    And like Coker said, Adams & McGary were both highly rated guys with plenty of offers... definitely not horrible recruits.
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    It's not the coaches, it's the perception. We were SMU death sentence, no wins bad during the last decade.

    All I saw was Oregon gear around town for as far as the eye could see, for as long as these kids have been playing Football.

    Stanford lowered admission requirements and got lifted up by a really good hire in Harbaugh.

    UW is on the brink of regaining its trendness and making the ESPN talking heads add us to the west coast conversation. Oregon and Stanford in the North have been replaced by the Dawgs. It's us and the SoCal schools until Petersen is gone.

    Petersen has the potential to elevate the program to new heights. It's couldn't be more exciting.

    Recruiting will take care of itself moving forward cause we have good leadership, coaches, stadium, facilities, and a ballin graphic design team.

    This is the last year that we are settling for guys. The perception has changed and recruiting is following one year behind. Were on the Map and all the kids who are ballers are in the know. OKGs
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited January 2017
    DawgFader said:


    This is the last year that we are settling for guys. The perception has changed and recruiting is following one year behind. Were on the Map and all the kids who are ballers are in the know. OKGs

    I like celebrating what may happen "next year" because it makes current bad news more tolerable. It's what I like to do.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,394 Standard Supporter
    DawgFader said:

    It's not the coaches, it's the perception. We were SMU death sentence, no wins bad during the last decade.

    All I saw was Oregon gear around town for as far as the eye could see, for as long as these kids have been playing Football.

    Stanford lowered admission requirements and got lifted up by a really good hire in Harbaugh.

    UW is on the brink of regaining its trendness and making the ESPN talking heads add us to the west coast conversation. Oregon and Stanford in the North have been replaced by the Dawgs. It's us and the SoCal schools until Petersen is gone.

    Petersen has the potential to elevate the program to new heights. It's couldn't be more exciting.

    Recruiting will take care of itself moving forward cause we have good leadership, coaches, stadium, facilities, and a ballin graphic design team.

    This is the last year that we are settling for guys. The perception has changed and recruiting is following one year behind. Were on the Map and all the kids who are ballers are in the know. OKGs

    Get outta here with the 0-12 bullshit.