The whole point of the playoff bullshit and the BCS before that was controversy. Controversy sells and it's impossible to ignore when it really is subjective bullshit.
Herbie sez he changed his mind because PSU showed resiliency by fighting back from the 28-7 deficit. The implication is that he's punishing UW for being too good and competent to fall behind by three TDS to their 8th-ranked CCG opponent. Fucker just likes to be entertained.
I get the weak OOC argument. But UW did exactly what you're supposed to do to weak OOC opponents, wipe the field with them. If any of those three games were still competitive after a quarter of play, then I could see holding it against them. But they weren't, so I won't.
At this poont I'd put UW third over Clemson on the basis of their respective CCG performances.
I like Herbie better than most analysts, but he really called Sark the best play caller in the country and said, "Welcome back to college football, Washington" after hiring Ty.
If you have to give an opinion on everything, you're bound to get a lot wrong, but those are really bad.
Comments
tune in at 9am tomorrow
ZzzZzzzZ
over Michigan who beat them by 30. Nothing would
surprise me about these fuckers though.
They can get fucked.
Even with my eyes closed I couldn't do it.
I get the weak OOC argument. But UW did exactly what you're supposed to do to weak OOC opponents, wipe the field with them. If any of those three games were still competitive after a quarter of play, then I could see holding it against them. But they weren't, so I won't.
At this poont I'd put UW third over Clemson on the basis of their respective CCG performances.
If you have to give an opinion on everything, you're bound to get a lot wrong, but those are really bad.