Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Maybe J. Smith isn't a complete retard
From today's Seattle times.
“We’re not going to just be going up and down the field and scoring 60, 70 points. I don’t see that coming,” UW offensive coordinator Jonathan Smith said. “So being able to stick and grind through it. But when there are plays to be made we have to make them. You’re going to get maybe half a dozen (chances at big) plays in this game against a good defense. We have to make those.”
I guess the question is "How much damage can six bad play calls create?".
4 ·
Comments
And Smiff gets run over by the team plane on the Tarmack.
A combo of a Rusty Trombone and a Dirty Sanchez? Or is this a new move I'm unaware of?
I don't think Smith is a very good playe caller overall, and I will celebrate when he is hired away, but this criticism reads like the Huskies go 3 and out all the time because they are constantly throwing deep. They don't and they aren't.
If Smith called games the way you are suggesting, there would be a huge uproar because the Huskies offense would score a lot less and would be both boring and predictable.
The USC game was a poor gameplan, executed poorly. But the rest of the season, I can't fault the mix of calls that much.
If you don't think UW throws deep too much and goes 3&out too much, you haven't been paying attention.
Against outmatched opponents, Smith could literally draw plays out of a hat, and most will work. UW's offense has really only been tested by two good defenses all year: Utah and USC. And there really isn't any debate that the offense earned low grades against both. They'll face a third good defense tonight; more of the same could get them beat.
Bottom line: UW has better players than CU. "Boring and predictable" will beat them. In fact, it will beat anyone in the country, excepting Bammer.