Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump nominates the swamp to lead the treasury
Comments
-
I'm responding to your posts. If you don't want a response you can always shut the fuck updhdawg said:
my hysteria? I just find it amusing that you guys are rushing to defend your daddy now that he's going against almost everything he ran on.RaceBannon said:
There was 2 choices I made the correct one.dhdawg said:
I never defended hillary on her wall street ties. she was never my candidate. I didn't vote for her.RaceBannon said:
You sound bitterdhdawg said:
if hillary had nominated someone who worked at soros fund management, you would be destroying her .Southerndawg said:
Mnuchin and Ross will make a great team. I'm looking forward to real pro growth leadership that has been so sorely lacking.greenblood said:
Don't like that either, but I'm definitely in favor of the corporate tax cuts, which should bring in a huge immediate influx of tax revenue.dhdawg said:
yes. it's standard republican/conservative policy. I really just threw it in at the end.greenblood said:The corporate tax cuts is to create an incentive for companies like Apple who have over $200 billion in overseas accounts, to bring the money back to this country.
It's the fact that he partnered and worked for the evil george soros that I find so hilarious.
GO TEAM TRUMP!!!
Hillary was fully funded by Wall Street and Soros. Not much of a choice. Maybe wait for Inauguration Day before we claim defeat? Guy knows his way around the swamp. The boss isn't bought and paid for like Hillary
but by all means, keep defending daddy and his lies no matter what he does.
Your hysteria amuses me -
Since you can't understand how an asset to liability ratio can effect a bottom line, I find you ironic.2001400ex said:
If Apple could invest in something to bring in a large return on its money, why would they not pay the 35%? Or borrow the money at 4%?greenblood said:
They actually don't. That's why they haven't had many acquisitions because they would have to bring in money that would be taxed.2001400ex said:
No. A corporate tax cut will not bring Apple cash home. A one tax holiday that has been discussed might.greenblood said:The corporate tax cuts is to create an incentive for companies like Apple who have over $200 billion in overseas accounts, to bring the money back to this country.
Either way, Apple has so much American cash they don't know how to spend, the foreign money will just go to shareholders through a dividend. Which is fine by me, I have quite a bit of Apple stock.
I have stock in it too. But that's one thing that has kept the stock from going higher.
Are you stupid or just not know anything about business? -
What's lost on you is leveraging assets.greenblood said:
Since you can't understand how an asset to liability ratio can effect a bottom line, I find you ironic.2001400ex said:
If Apple could invest in something to bring in a large return on its money, why would they not pay the 35%? Or borrow the money at 4%?greenblood said:
They actually don't. That's why they haven't had many acquisitions because they would have to bring in money that would be taxed.2001400ex said:
No. A corporate tax cut will not bring Apple cash home. A one tax holiday that has been discussed might.greenblood said:The corporate tax cuts is to create an incentive for companies like Apple who have over $200 billion in overseas accounts, to bring the money back to this country.
Either way, Apple has so much American cash they don't know how to spend, the foreign money will just go to shareholders through a dividend. Which is fine by me, I have quite a bit of Apple stock.
I have stock in it too. But that's one thing that has kept the stock from going higher.
Are you stupid or just not know anything about business?
"I'm not making this investment with a 10% return because it's going to cost me 4%" said no one ever. -
But what if you now have the liquid cash to avoid the 4%?2001400ex said:
What's lost on you is leveraging assets.greenblood said:
Since you can't understand how an asset to liability ratio can effect a bottom line, I find you ironic.2001400ex said:
If Apple could invest in something to bring in a large return on its money, why would they not pay the 35%? Or borrow the money at 4%?greenblood said:
They actually don't. That's why they haven't had many acquisitions because they would have to bring in money that would be taxed.2001400ex said:
No. A corporate tax cut will not bring Apple cash home. A one tax holiday that has been discussed might.greenblood said:The corporate tax cuts is to create an incentive for companies like Apple who have over $200 billion in overseas accounts, to bring the money back to this country.
Either way, Apple has so much American cash they don't know how to spend, the foreign money will just go to shareholders through a dividend. Which is fine by me, I have quite a bit of Apple stock.
I have stock in it too. But that's one thing that has kept the stock from going higher.
Are you stupid or just not know anything about business?
"I'm not making this investment with a 10% return because it's going to cost me 4%" said no one ever. -
Then you use the liquid cash. Or a stock transfer sale.greenblood said:
But what if you now have the liquid cash to avoid the 4%?2001400ex said:
What's lost on you is leveraging assets.greenblood said:
Since you can't understand how an asset to liability ratio can effect a bottom line, I find you ironic.2001400ex said:
If Apple could invest in something to bring in a large return on its money, why would they not pay the 35%? Or borrow the money at 4%?greenblood said:
They actually don't. That's why they haven't had many acquisitions because they would have to bring in money that would be taxed.2001400ex said:
No. A corporate tax cut will not bring Apple cash home. A one tax holiday that has been discussed might.greenblood said:The corporate tax cuts is to create an incentive for companies like Apple who have over $200 billion in overseas accounts, to bring the money back to this country.
Either way, Apple has so much American cash they don't know how to spend, the foreign money will just go to shareholders through a dividend. Which is fine by me, I have quite a bit of Apple stock.
I have stock in it too. But that's one thing that has kept the stock from going higher.
Are you stupid or just not know anything about business?
"I'm not making this investment with a 10% return because it's going to cost me 4%" said no one ever.
The point is, for people who have no clue about business. At all. That taxes are not keeping Apple from not investing in companies. It's the lack of businesses they want to buy that will provide a return they want. Apple can do what the fuck they want. They can almost buy Microsoft on a straight cash sale. -
The point is, for people who have no clue about business. At all.
Trump is going to want to know where this $500 Billion in cash Apple is sitting on. -
Now trump is considering the president of goldman sachs for a cabinet position, after bashing Cruz and Clinton's ties to the same bank during the campaign.
Enjoy you trump voters. You got what you voted for. An all time great con artist -
You aren't having a good day.
