Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

With the latest rankings

dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
in Hardcore Husky Board
You can pretty much confirm a win and UW is in.

Utah is now 20, Stanford 18.

A win over colorado makes it 3 top 20 wins
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    And a big win is not be overlooked.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter


    Score all the points.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BrickSquadBrickSquad Member Posts: 1,658
    The committee also said there was a big gap between Penn State and Ohio State. I could see Michigan getting in if Penn State wins + UW loses.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • godawgstgodawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,531 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Wrong. Either UW or Clemson loses Michigan in. They would have beaten Colorado, Penn State, Wisconsin which are the next three teams behind them.

    Only reason Hocutt would bring up how "close" UW & Michigan is to plant the seed that the committee could flip the two teams even if UW wins.

    I know you don't want to Pete, but style points matter Friday. Run it up if you can.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,892
    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Colorado isn't getting in no matter what they do.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    salemcoog said:

    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Colorado isn't getting in no matter what they do.
    Agreed. Not sure why they think there is a chance.

    Even the local sportscasters have been stroking the boofs playoff chances over repeating the typical bronco hot-talk.

    Indica game skrong.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ExtraChrisBExtraChrisB Member Posts: 1,811
    edited November 2016
    godawgst said:

    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Wrong. Either UW or Clemson loses Michigan in. They would have beaten Colorado, Penn State, Wisconsin which are the next three teams behind them.

    Only reason Hocutt would bring up how "close" UW & Michigan is to plant the seed that the committee could flip the two teams even if UW wins.

    I know you don't want to Pete, but style points matter Friday. Run it up if you can.
    Strongly disagree. A dormant team is not passing a team who gains a top 10 win and a conference championship. Not a fucking chance, no matter the style points.

    In fact, I took it as the opposite. He said UW and Michigan are razor close right after talking about the big gap between Michigan and Penn State/Wisconsin. So, necessarily, UW has just as big of gap between them as well. If anything, it was reassurance that the B1G champ won't pass UW if UW wins.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    godawgst said:

    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Wrong. Either UW or Clemson loses Michigan in. They would have beaten Colorado, Penn State, Wisconsin which are the next three teams behind them.

    Only reason Hocutt would bring up how "close" UW & Michigan is to plant the seed that the committee could flip the two teams even if UW wins.

    I know you don't want to Pete, but style points matter Friday. Run it up if you can.
    Michigan isn't getting in no matter fucking what. IDGAF what Hocutt said. They're done.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PineapplePiratePineapplePirate Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 4,628 Swaye's Wigwam
    I would love to watch Michigan get plungered by Alabama.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,812
    ExtraChrisB said:

    godawgst said:

    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Wrong. Either UW or Clemson loses Michigan in. They would have beaten Colorado, Penn State, Wisconsin which are the next three teams behind them.

    Only reason Hocutt would bring up how "close" UW & Michigan is to plant the seed that the committee could flip the two teams even if UW wins.

    I know you don't want to Pete, but style points matter Friday. Run it up if you can.
    Strongly disagree. A dormant team is not passing a team who gains a top 10 win and a conference championship. Not a fucking chance, no matter the style points.

    In fact, I took it as the opposite. He said UW and Michigan are razor close right after talking about the big gap between Michigan and Penn State/Wisconsin. So, necessarily, UW has just as big of gap between them as well. If anything, it was reassurance that the B1G champ won't pass UW if UW wins.
    I heard him talk about the gap between Ohio State and Penn State/Wisconsin, didn't hear that about Michigan. You sure he said that? Big if true.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyfavrehuskyfavre Member Posts: 121
    GrundleStiltzkin said:



    Score all the points.
    Based on this, after Saint Haden, Iowa deserves canonization consideration. Without Iowa, there'd be no path for Warshington to get in. I also think I was rooting for the wrong team when I wanted Michigan to beat OSU.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyfavrehuskyfavre Member Posts: 121
    dnc said:

    ExtraChrisB said:

    godawgst said:

    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It doesn't matter. The season doesn't end this week but Michigans did. If they didn't shit the bed vs Iowa then they could have afforded a loss to Ohio State.

    Michigan has 0 chance unless some absolute chaos happens. Like Clemson and Washington both lose.

    They still have no chance in that scenario. Big Ten champ and Colorado would get in over them.

    They're not taking a team that finished third in it's division.

    They're done.
    Wrong. Either UW or Clemson loses Michigan in. They would have beaten Colorado, Penn State, Wisconsin which are the next three teams behind them.

    Only reason Hocutt would bring up how "close" UW & Michigan is to plant the seed that the committee could flip the two teams even if UW wins.

    I know you don't want to Pete, but style points matter Friday. Run it up if you can.
    Strongly disagree. A dormant team is not passing a team who gains a top 10 win and a conference championship. Not a fucking chance, no matter the style points.

    In fact, I took it as the opposite. He said UW and Michigan are razor close right after talking about the big gap between Michigan and Penn State/Wisconsin. So, necessarily, UW has just as big of gap between them as well. If anything, it was reassurance that the B1G champ won't pass UW if UW wins.
    I heard him talk about the gap between Ohio State and Penn State/Wisconsin, didn't hear that about Michigan. You sure he said that? Big if true.
    Pretty much all Hocutt said to Reece was the margin was razor thin b/w Wars and Mich. It was the one thing he came on to say.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    huskyfavre said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:



    Score all the points.
    Based on this, after Saint Haden, Iowa deserves canonization consideration. Without Iowa, there'd be no path for Warshington to get in. I also think I was rooting for the wrong team when I wanted Michigan to beat OSU.
    Michigan is still in the picture because they have three wins in the top 8. Had OSU lost they'd have two top 10 (OU and Wisc). The gap between UW and OSU would have been larger than the current gap between UW and UM.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyfavrehuskyfavre Member Posts: 121
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    huskyfavre said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:



    Score all the points.
    Based on this, after Saint Haden, Iowa deserves canonization consideration. Without Iowa, there'd be no path for Warshington to get in. I also think I was rooting for the wrong team when I wanted Michigan to beat OSU.
    Michigan is still in the picture because they have three wins in the top 8. Had OSU lost they'd have two top 10 (OU and Wisc). The gap between UW and OSU would have been larger than the current gap between UW and UM.
    If MI had won, OSU would have lost to #7 and #2 (MI would have been 2 if they won). No way committee would drop them below 4. MI has lost to #UR and #2 and is 'razor thin' below us. If MI had won, OSU would be a solid #4, and I'd have heartburn going in to CU as the #5. As it is, we're in the play-in game, so it doesn't matter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    huskyfavre said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:



    Score all the points.
    Based on this, after Saint Haden, Iowa deserves canonization consideration. Without Iowa, there'd be no path for Warshington to get in. I also think I was rooting for the wrong team when I wanted Michigan to beat OSU.
    Two tings:

    1. If Michigan hadn't shit itself against Iowa, Ohio State would be playing Wisconsin and the committee could take the four best conference champs. Michigan would probably be ahead of Washington now but they would switch if Washington won the Pac.

    2. If Michigan hadn't shit itself against Ohio State, the Buckeyes would be where Michigan is now and Michigan would be playing Wisconsin.


    TL, DR: Michigan screwed up the Big Ten championship but everything else is fine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • huskyfavrehuskyfavre Member Posts: 121
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    huskyfavre said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:



    Score all the points.
    Based on this, after Saint Haden, Iowa deserves canonization consideration. Without Iowa, there'd be no path for Warshington to get in. I also think I was rooting for the wrong team when I wanted Michigan to beat OSU.
    Two tings:

    1. If Michigan hadn't shit itself against Iowa, Ohio State would be playing Wisconsin and the committee could take the four best conference champs. Michigan would probably be ahead of Washington now but they would switch if Washington won the Pac.

    2. If Michigan hadn't shit itself against Ohio State, the Buckeyes would be where Michigan is now and Michigan would be playing Wisconsin.


    TL, DR: Michigan screwed up the Big Ten championship but everything else is fine.
    I'm really glad I don't have to see how this board would have reacted when a Michigan Big 10 champ and 2-loss OSU got in over a 1-loss Pac-12 champ.

    Wait, that would have been the one and only silver lining in getting jobbed by the committee.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.