Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OL Talk

RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
in Hardcore Husky Board
Adams might not be as good as we thought. Great in the run game, but he has been pretty bad in protection the last two weeks. This could be an overreaction, he could be hurt. I don't know, but there have been times Browning gets pressured and I watch the replay and he's the one fucking up.

Play Nick Harris at RG. Brostek is worthless and Harris is better than Kirkland. Harris can actually move. The other two guys are stiffs. I'm surprised they let Brostek play as much as he did against USC. The coaches obviously saw on tape that he was a huge factor in the loss.

Dennis was right on Coleman Shelton. The coaches seem to love him, but he's average.

I still love McGary.
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    McGary is a goddamned man out there, especially in the running game. Hope Twattenberg is as advertised for 2017.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,979
    I heard 2 weeks ago that our OL was fine and there was nothing to worry about ... pretty quick tune change there ...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Tequilla said:

    I heard 2 weeks ago that our OL was fine and there was nothing to worry about ... pretty quick tune change there ...

    Just talking some football. I would say Browning and the play calling is the #1 concern. Getting pressure with 4 is #2.

    There isn't anything to be too concerned about.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622
    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:

    I heard 2 weeks ago that our OL was fine and there was nothing to worry about ... pretty quick tune change there ...

    Just talking some football. I would say Browning and the play calling is the #1 concern. Getting pressure with 4 is #2.

    There isn't anything to be too concerned about.
    So basically the offensive play calling, pass rush and pass protection are areas of concern.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AEBAEB Member Posts: 2,985
    Passion said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Tequilla said:

    I heard 2 weeks ago that our OL was fine and there was nothing to worry about ... pretty quick tune change there ...

    Just talking some football. I would say Browning and the play calling is the #1 concern. Getting pressure with 4 is #2.

    There isn't anything to be too concerned about.
    So basically the offensive play calling, pass rush and pass protection are areas of concern.
    Yes. But remember, the concern is about what is needed to make this team a perennial Top 5 program not a Top 20 program. In 3 years, Pete got us to the Top 20. What do we need to take the next step?

    Regarding Adams, I thought he was alright. He was pushing the rushers outside. Browning had to step up in the pocket most times.

    Brostek was awful in the SC game. They literally bull rushed him every time in the 2nd half collapsing the pocket.

    Not making excuses. Need to keep recruiting talented OL. Henry B, hopefully Fozzy Bear, and maybe a surprise 3rd.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    Tequilla said:

    I heard 2 weeks ago that our OL was fine and there was nothing to worry about ... pretty quick tune change there ...

    ....and?

    Phil Bleenor knew that shit 2 decades ago
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,747 Founders Club
    Pumpy is back, baby
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    Pumpy is back, baby

    Meds are dialed in.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jecorneljecornel Member Posts: 9,727
    FWIW, my first dad thought the line looked like shit yesterday. He was none too pleased.

    It did appear they were bullied at times. Did not see many gaping holes as we had been accustomed to.

    The O needs to dial in this week.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    Adams might not be as good as we thought. Great in the run game, but he has been pretty bad in protection the last two weeks. This could be an overreaction, he could be hurt. I don't know, but there have been times Browning gets pressured and I watch the replay and he's the one fucking up.

    Play Nick Harris at RG. Brostek is worthless and Harris is better than Kirkland. Harris can actually move. The other two guys are stiffs. I'm surprised they let Brostek play as much as he did against USC. The coaches obviously saw on tape that he was a huge factor in the loss.

    Dennis was right on Coleman Shelton. The coaches seem to love him, but he's average.

    I still love McGary.

    Shelton is hardly average buttfuck. He plays 5 positions well. Average players cant do that, AND pull effectively from said positions. Oh, and Adams is basically an 18 year old sophomore playing at the highest level, without a RS year. Tard POY. 55, how did I ever give you board cred?
    Hurtful. I know how old Adams is. Are you gonna queef some football talk out of your twat or just name call?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    jecornel said:

    FWIW, my first dad thought the line looked like shit yesterday. He was none too pleased.

    It did appear they were bullied at times. Did not see many gaping holes as we had been accustomed to.

    The O needs to dial in this week.

    they definitely looked flat along with the rest of the offense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.