Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

OT fellow sportsbook gamblers: USC -6 vs Arizona

GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
edited October 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
Seems odd to me. Looks like Vegas is really thinking Kiffin's departure will have a positive impact on the team...even with Lee being questionable.

Also, Louisville -18 at home vs Rutgers seems like a good pick. Louisville will need to run the score up every possible time because their schedule is so shitty.

Oklahoma -14 against a shit Texas team

Comments

  • RavennaDawgRavennaDawg Member Posts: 846
    I got worked last week with Oklahoma, and Stanford ("Hey, I'll bet for Stanford, so if the UW wins I'll be happy, or if the UW gets boat raced at least I can make money. There's no way I can be completely upset after the game. No way. I'm just too smart!")

    I'd take Louisville.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited October 2013
    Strong on the self-awareness the RavennaDawg is. Kids killed my degenerate (albeit sometimes profitable) gambling so I will live through your peaks and valleys.

    Out of that list, the only concern is the USC game.

    I am not sure I would touch USC with even your money, but what do I know...
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    You all saw what a trainwreck Arizona is at QB. I've never seen such poor performance at the position at the D1A level. I take it back - since Oregon had to play their 5th string QB after all out QBs were injured in 2007 in the 21-0 game against UCLA. That offense is awful, and USC is good for 14-17 points. They won't need much more.
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    USC wins rather easily with the Dead Coach Bounce, say 34-17?
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180
    All those games could go either way for me. I could see Lousville rolling but I'm gun shy betting them again after they sucked it up vs Kentucky. The USC game is a crap shoot IMO. USC could get a big bounce but they could also be the same old USC. Having Orgeron won't make any of their qbs competent. Then again, vanilla vick is beyond incompetent as well. I like Oklahoma, though. Texas is a mess. It's a rivalry game but the red river has been a rivalry game that has turned into a plungering quite a few times over the past 10 years or so.
  • AZDuckAZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    edited October 2013
    I think take OU and give the points
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419

    I got worked last week with Oklahoma, and Stanford ("Hey, I'll bet for Stanford, so if the UW wins I'll be happy, or if the UW gets boat raced at least I can make money. There's no way I can be completely upset after the game. No way. I'm just too smart!")

    I'd take Louisville.

    Haha me too man, me too. Thank god Ohio bbbbarely covered and kept me in the green.
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    AZDuck said:

    You all saw what a trainwreck Arizona is at QB. I've never seen such poor performance at the position at the D1A level. I take it back - since Oregon had to play their 5th string QB after all out QBs were injured in 2007 in the 21-0 game against UCLA. That offense is awful, and USC is good for 14-17 points. They won't need much more.

    Agree. Take out the ASU game, and USC was playing good on defense. Add a little life to the offense as a result of Kiffin's firing and USC wins. It will probably be a close game, but I don't think -6 is too crazy.

Sign In or Register to comment.