Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sark's been underachieving relative to the talent level on the roster for five years now.

    He is Ron Zook without receiving the backdoor plunger rape in the Rose Bowl.
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    Lane Kiffin disagrees with you
  • chrisvashonchrisvashon Member Posts: 627
    "Dawgman Grad Assistant." Lol.

    Fuck that site is dumb.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 106,025 Founders Club

    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?

    Winning >>>>>> Outplaying

    Take your participation ribbon and roll on out of here
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?

    If the 5 year plan is to be the Chan Gailey of the west, mission accomplished.

  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,287
    It sounds good until you dig a little deeper

    1) UW has 2 4-star midget WRs (one of whom is looking at other schools) that are having horrible high school seasons Thus far
    2) a recent 4-star OG/DT who has been dropped by his 2 hometown schools and even the biggest of doogs say is unlikely to make it
    3) a DE who is out for the season with a blown achilles
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?

    If the 5 year plan is to be the Chan Gailey of the west, mission accomplished.

    Chan Gailey = Sark door ass out after next year. Wouldnt be against that....unless Sark gets an NFL job this year. Allah willing...
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?

    If the 5 year plan is to be the Chan Gailey of the west, mission accomplished.

    Chan Gailey = Sark door ass out after next year. Wouldnt be against that....unless Sark gets an NFL job this year. Allah willing...
    Chan even got an extension after year 5 followed by the door.ass.out. in year 6.

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?

    Sark didn't do anything besides cost they game.

  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

    It sounds good until you dig a little deeper

    1) UW has 2 4-star midget WRs (one of whom is looking at other schools) that are having horrible high school seasons Thus far
    2) a recent 4-star OG/DT who has been dropped by his 2 hometown schools and even the biggest of doogs say is unlikely to make it
    3) a DE who is out for the season with a blown achilles

    I wouldn't say Erik Brown qualifies for a "midget reciever". He is 6'1.
  • Sark's been underachieving relative to the talent level on the roster for five years now.

    He is Ron Zook without receiving the backdoor plunger rape in the Rose Bowl.

    If Pool Boy wasn't an idiot then Sark could have been Ron Zook of Florida. Shit can Sark last year after the Apple Cup and this team is 5-0 ranked in the top 10. This game would be for the Rose Bowl and an a possible shot at a national title had Pool Boy made the obvious move.
  • DugtheDoogDugtheDoog Member Posts: 3,180

    It sounds good until you dig a little deeper

    1) UW has 2 4-star midget WRs (one of whom is looking at other schools) that are having horrible high school seasons Thus far
    2) a recent 4-star OG/DT who has been dropped by his 2 hometown schools and even the biggest of doogs say is unlikely to make it
    3) a DE who is out for the season with a blown achilles

    Is that the story on the OG/DT who committed to us? He gave sark a verbal cuz he's the only one who wanted him since he won't qualify? That's a bummer. I read his offer list and got excited we actually got some inside beef that other teams wanted. So much for that.
  • dhdawgdhdawg Member Posts: 13,326

    It sounds good until you dig a little deeper

    1) UW has 2 4-star midget WRs (one of whom is looking at other schools) that are having horrible high school seasons Thus far
    2) a recent 4-star OG/DT who has been dropped by his 2 hometown schools and even the biggest of doogs say is unlikely to make it
    3) a DE who is out for the season with a blown achilles

    I wouldn't say Erik Brown qualifies for a "midget reciever". He is 6'1.
    he weighs 175, HTH
  • DeepSeaZDeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901
    I believe you mean "thy game" you ol' scallywag.

    Sark's in his 5th year of the standard 5-year plan. He just outplayed the #5 team in the country, he recruits well and is 4-1. WTF you bitching about punk?

    Sark didn't do anything besides cost they game.

  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499
    dhdawg said:

    It sounds good until you dig a little deeper

    1) UW has 2 4-star midget WRs (one of whom is looking at other schools) that are having horrible high school seasons Thus far
    2) a recent 4-star OG/DT who has been dropped by his 2 hometown schools and even the biggest of doogs say is unlikely to make it
    3) a DE who is out for the season with a blown achilles

    I wouldn't say Erik Brown qualifies for a "midget reciever". He is 6'1.
    he weighs 175, HTH
    Because it is impossible for college athletes to add weight onto their frame.
  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,071 Swaye's Wigwam

    dhdawg said:

    It sounds good until you dig a little deeper

    1) UW has 2 4-star midget WRs (one of whom is looking at other schools) that are having horrible high school seasons Thus far
    2) a recent 4-star OG/DT who has been dropped by his 2 hometown schools and even the biggest of doogs say is unlikely to make it
    3) a DE who is out for the season with a blown achilles

    I wouldn't say Erik Brown qualifies for a "midget reciever". He is 6'1.
    he weighs 175, HTH
    Because it is impossible for college athletes to add weight onto their frame.
    Pretty sure it's just standard around here to refer to WR recruits as midgets. Guys were saying the same thing last year, when the recruits went about 6'4", 6'4", and midget (Ross).

    The points about the recruiting class being overrated by the star system is valid for reasons 2 and 3. Plus it is awful warm around here for February.
Sign In or Register to comment.