I'm glad he cheated on his taxes. Giving less money to this shitty government is a good thing. If you don't send it, they can't waste it.
Sure they can. They borrow it. How do you think Bush funded his war in Iraq? We will be paying the Chinese for many decades to pay off that war.
And all Obama's done is outspend Bush by 2 trillion more (7.9T vs. 5.8T), during a period of troop draw-downs and a thriving economy. Blabber on, genius.
What bills did Obama put into place to spend $8 trillion? That should be easy to show.
You do realize that the deficit was huge at the beginning of his term mostly from reduced revenues from the recession. Right? But still, show me his 8 trillion in spending.
Obama's budget deficits alone dwarf W's, 6.6T vs. 3.2T. Ouch.
I'm glad he cheated on his taxes. Giving less money to this shitty government is a good thing. If you don't send it, they can't waste it.
Sure they can. They borrow it. How do you think Bush funded his war in Iraq? We will be paying the Chinese for many decades to pay off that war.
And all Obama's done is outspend Bush by 2 trillion more (7.9T vs. 5.8T), during a period of troop draw-downs and a thriving economy. Blabber on, genius.
What bills did Obama put into place to spend $8 trillion? That should be easy to show.
You do realize that the deficit was huge at the beginning of his term mostly from reduced revenues from the recession. Right? But still, show me his 8 trillion in spending.
Obama's budget deficits alone dwarf W's, 6.6T vs. 3.2T. Ouch.
Context does wonders. Bush inherited a surplus it took a few years to fuck up. Obama inherited a shit show it took a few years to work out.
I'm glad he cheated on his taxes. Giving less money to this shitty government is a good thing. If you don't send it, they can't waste it.
Sure they can. They borrow it. How do you think Bush funded his war in Iraq? We will be paying the Chinese for many decades to pay off that war.
And all Obama's done is outspend Bush by 2 trillion more (7.9T vs. 5.8T), during a period of troop draw-downs and a thriving economy. Blabber on, genius.
What bills did Obama put into place to spend $8 trillion? That should be easy to show.
You do realize that the deficit was huge at the beginning of his term mostly from reduced revenues from the recession. Right? But still, show me his 8 trillion in spending.
Obama's budget deficits alone dwarf W's, 6.6T vs. 3.2T. Ouch.
Context does wonders. Bush inherited a surplus it took a few years to fuck up. Obama inherited a shit show it took a few years to work out.
I'm glad he cheated on his taxes. Giving less money to this shitty government is a good thing. If you don't send it, they can't waste it.
Sure they can. They borrow it. How do you think Bush funded his war in Iraq? We will be paying the Chinese for many decades to pay off that war.
And all Obama's done is outspend Bush by 2 trillion more (7.9T vs. 5.8T), during a period of troop draw-downs and a thriving economy. Blabber on, genius.
What bills did Obama put into place to spend $8 trillion? That should be easy to show.
You do realize that the deficit was huge at the beginning of his term mostly from reduced revenues from the recession. Right? But still, show me his 8 trillion in spending.
Obama's budget deficits alone dwarf W's, 6.6T vs. 3.2T. Ouch.
Context does wonders. Bush inherited a surplus it took a few years to fuck up. Obama inherited a shit show it took a few years to work out.
Obunghole never worked out anything but spending money we didn't have. Now he's superfunded Iran.
I'm glad he cheated on his taxes. Giving less money to this shitty government is a good thing. If you don't send it, they can't waste it.
Sure they can. They borrow it. How do you think Bush funded his war in Iraq? We will be paying the Chinese for many decades to pay off that war.
And all Obama's done is outspend Bush by 2 trillion more (7.9T vs. 5.8T), during a period of troop draw-downs and a thriving economy. Blabber on, genius.
What bills did Obama put into place to spend $8 trillion? That should be easy to show.
You do realize that the deficit was huge at the beginning of his term mostly from reduced revenues from the recession. Right? But still, show me his 8 trillion in spending.
Obama's budget deficits alone dwarf W's, 6.6T vs. 3.2T. Ouch.
Context does wonders. Bush inherited a surplus it took a few years to fuck up. Obama inherited a shit show it took a few years to work out.
Black presidents only inherit downtrodden economies.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
I'm glad he cheated on his taxes. Giving less money to this shitty government is a good thing. If you don't send it, they can't waste it.
Sure they can. They borrow it. How do you think Bush funded his war in Iraq? We will be paying the Chinese for many decades to pay off that war.
And all Obama's done is outspend Bush by 2 trillion more (7.9T vs. 5.8T), during a period of troop draw-downs and a thriving economy. Blabber on, genius.
What bills did Obama put into place to spend $8 trillion? That should be easy to show.
You do realize that the deficit was huge at the beginning of his term mostly from reduced revenues from the recession. Right? But still, show me his 8 trillion in spending.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
A thriving economy can spend more without borrowing.
Good luck understanding economics when you get to college.
Lol says the guys who believes in make believe wars because of Reddit poasts hahahahahaha.
Lol at the guy that was wooooooshed so hard he still wonders if the Russians really did sink a US warship in the Black Sea and that the media conspired with the Feds to hide all the details, and it just feeds into his paranoia which causes him to believe Trump who says the media is out to get him, and everything is rigged.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
Guys a fucking moron.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
This...
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
Guys a fucking moron.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
This...
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
Guys a fucking moron.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
This...
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
It's civil. But yes, disgusting nonetheless. California already dismissed it, so I don't know if New York found something California didn't. But again, not a criminal case.
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has.
A thriving economy can spend more without borrowing.
Good luck understanding economics when you get to college.
Lol says the guys who believes in make believe wars because of Reddit poasts hahahahahaha.
Lol at the guy that was wooooooshed so hard he still wonders if the Russians really did sink a US warship in the Black Sea and that the media conspired with the Feds to hide all the details, and it just feeds into his paranoia which causes him to believe Trump who says the media is out to get him, and everything is rigged.
Embarassing even for your standards. Which are already incredibly low.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
Guys a fucking moron.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
This...
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
It's civil. But yes, disgusting nonetheless. California already dismissed it, so I don't know if New York found something California didn't. But again, not a criminal case.
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has.
Yes both are shit.
On that point, Trump has admitted to contributing to the Clinton foundation for favors.
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
Guys a fucking moron.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
This...
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
It's civil. But yes, disgusting nonetheless. California already dismissed it, so I don't know if New York found something California didn't. But again, not a criminal case.
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has.
Yes both are shit.
On that point, Trump has admitted to contributing to the Clinton foundation for favors.
And so would any other business if they had the means and opportunity. It would be stupid not to. A politician has a higher ethical standard while in office.
A thriving economy can spend more without borrowing.
Good luck understanding economics when you get to college.
Lol says the guys who believes in make believe wars because of Reddit poasts hahahahahaha.
Lol at the guy that was wooooooshed so hard he still wonders if the Russians really did sink a US warship in the Black Sea and that the media conspired with the Feds to hide all the details, and it just feeds into his paranoia which causes him to believe Trump who says the media is out to get him, and everything is rigged.
Embarassing even for your standards.
You should learn not to feel embarrassed so easily. Unless you like going through life as a big pussy.
Comments
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has.
You really are terrible at this.
On that point, Trump has admitted to contributing to the Clinton foundation for favors.