Trump cheated on his taxes,
Comments
-
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.greenblood said:
This...mobey said:
Guys a fucking moron.OZONE said:
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donald-trump-tax.html
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two. -
Trump and the Troomps on here have been saying for months that the FBI is in bed with Hillary. Now he's in bed with Trump? Shocker.
-
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?2001400ex said:
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.greenblood said:
This...mobey said:
Guys a fucking moron.OZONE said:
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donald-trump-tax.html
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
-
TL,dr but might be a civil case.greenblood said:
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?2001400ex said:
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.greenblood said:
This...mobey said:
Guys a fucking moron.OZONE said:
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donald-trump-tax.html
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/ -
It's civil. But yes, disgusting nonetheless. California already dismissed it, so I don't know if New York found something California didn't. But again, not a criminal case.2001400ex said:
TL,dr but might be a civil case.greenblood said:
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?2001400ex said:
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.greenblood said:
This...mobey said:
Guys a fucking moron.OZONE said:
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donald-trump-tax.html
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has. -
Embarassing even for your standards. Which are already incredibly low.OZONE said:
Lol at the guy that was wooooooshed so hard he still wonders if the Russians really did sink a US warship in the Black Sea and that the media conspired with the Feds to hide all the details, and it just feeds into his paranoia which causes him to believe Trump who says the media is out to get him, and everything is rigged.CuntWaffle said:
Lol says the guys who believes in make believe wars because of Reddit poasts hahahahahaha.OZONE said:A thriving economy can spend more without borrowing.
Good luck understanding economics when you get to college.
You really are terrible at this. -
Yes both are shit.greenblood said:
It's civil. But yes, disgusting nonetheless. California already dismissed it, so I don't know if New York found something California didn't. But again, not a criminal case.2001400ex said:
TL,dr but might be a civil case.greenblood said:
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?2001400ex said:
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.greenblood said:
This...mobey said:
Guys a fucking moron.OZONE said:
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donald-trump-tax.html
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has.
On that point, Trump has admitted to contributing to the Clinton foundation for favors. -
And so would any other business if they had the means and opportunity. It would be stupid not to. A politician has a higher ethical standard while in office.2001400ex said:
Yes both are shit.greenblood said:
It's civil. But yes, disgusting nonetheless. California already dismissed it, so I don't know if New York found something California didn't. But again, not a criminal case.2001400ex said:
TL,dr but might be a civil case.greenblood said:
We know about the civil suit. What criminal investigation are you talking about? The Russia ties which the New York Times wrote an article that there is nothing there?2001400ex said:
Except Trump is being investigated criminally and civilly.greenblood said:
This...mobey said:
Guys a fucking moron.OZONE said:
"Tax experts who reviewed documents for The Times said Mr. Trump trampled a core tax policy tenet by receiving tax benefits for losing vast amounts of other people’s money."
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/donald-trump-tax.html
I'm sure NYTimes will retract this story, after Trump sues them.... or maybe they won't.
That is not allowed today but was allowed back then until the dumbshit Congress and IRS figured out they were being butt fucked.
And once on the tax return, on the tax return.
Both candidates are ethically and morally corrupt. It's just that one candidate is currently being criminally investigated.
Trump was right. Although ethically and morally distasteful, what he did was smart and LEGAL at the time. That's the difference between the two.
Or is there a criminal case outside the United States? If so, not quite the same thing as an investigation by your own government.
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
I'm not going to defend Trump either. I think he's just as morally and ethically disgusting as the Clinton's, but he didn't put our nation's secrets at risk, and had classified information turn up on a civilian's laptop. Of which has led to a criminal investigation.
Trump also may very well push agenda and policy for money. However, that's an assumption. We know Clinton has.
On that point, Trump has admitted to contributing to the Clinton foundation for favors. -
You should learn not to feel embarrassed so easily. Unless you like going through life as a big pussy.CuntWaffle said:
Embarassing even for your standards.OZONE said:
Lol at the guy that was wooooooshed so hard he still wonders if the Russians really did sink a US warship in the Black Sea and that the media conspired with the Feds to hide all the details, and it just feeds into his paranoia which causes him to believe Trump who says the media is out to get him, and everything is rigged.CuntWaffle said:
Lol says the guys who believes in make believe wars because of Reddit poasts hahahahahaha.OZONE said:A thriving economy can spend more without borrowing.
Good luck understanding economics when you get to college.
