It was the defense that could have ignited the massive plungering of Utah. Normally, it has been the offense to start the plunger action.
Budda should have taken that pick to the house where he had both hands on the ball. Then jojo had the second opportunity to pick it.
I believe the defense will look to atone for missed chances. Jimmy Lake made note that the secondary will be made very aware of their missed opportunities.
Gaskin and Coleman should both be over a 150 yards rushing this week with Browning not having to throw more than 15-18 times.
Watching the Utah game a second time. Benning Potato was somehow worse than PSALM. PSALM had a couple horrific missed tackles. Vea and Qualls had really poor leverage throughout the game. The o-lineman literally stood them straight up. As Pete says you have get off and shed blocks. Utah had some girth for sure. If these dline guys are listening the NFL hype they better realize it takes more than media hype. There is work to be done for a number of those guys. No news to all you diehards, but Mathis needs to hurry back.
If Utah gets their much wanted second crack at UW I think the result will be much worse for Troy and the rest of his team. Washington brought it's B- game and Utah gave everything they had and it wasn't nearly enough.
To answer the original question, yes I would be happy with 24 or less.
It's been many moons since that happened...'97 was last time we gave up 3 or less to CAL.
I have high standards.
I live in a trailer.
All the comforts of the res, on wheels!
Were @Swaye 's ancestors more like nomadic, teepee Indians or semi-settled longhouse ones? I haven't lurked here long enough to know if this has been covered previously. I also get confused because the premium chat room logo shows a teepee but references a wigwam.
I like to keep people guessing. I'm a hard target.
My people lived in wigwam style homes, but they were called asi. And now you know...
Ah so SEC/ACC Indians, not Big 12 Indians. Duly noted.
It's been many moons since that happened...'97 was last time we gave up 3 or less to CAL.
I have high standards.
I live in a trailer.
All the comforts of the res, on wheels!
Were @Swaye 's ancestors more like nomadic, teepee Indians or semi-settled longhouse ones? I haven't lurked here long enough to know if this has been covered previously. I also get confused because the premium chat room logo shows a teepee but references a wigwam.
I like to keep people guessing. I'm a hard target.
My people lived in wigwam style homes, but they were called asi. And now you know...
Ah so SEC/ACC Indians, not Big 12 Indians. Duly noted.
Depends. Started out as Georgia injuns, lost badly to smallpox and whitey, moved to Oklahoma. Abudance?
It's been many moons since that happened...'97 was last time we gave up 3 or less to CAL.
I have high standards.
I live in a trailer.
All the comforts of the res, on wheels!
Were @Swaye 's ancestors more like nomadic, teepee Indians or semi-settled longhouse ones? I haven't lurked here long enough to know if this has been covered previously. I also get confused because the premium chat room logo shows a teepee but references a wigwam.
I like to keep people guessing. I'm a hard target.
My people lived in wigwam style homes, but they were called asi. And now you know...
Ah so SEC/ACC Indians, not Big 12 Indians. Duly noted.
Depends. Started out as Georgia injuns, lost badly to smallpox and whitey, moved to Oklahoma. Abudance?
It's been many moons since that happened...'97 was last time we gave up 3 or less to CAL.
I have high standards.
I live in a trailer.
All the comforts of the res, on wheels!
Were @Swaye 's ancestors more like nomadic, teepee Indians or semi-settled longhouse ones? I haven't lurked here long enough to know if this has been covered previously. I also get confused because the premium chat room logo shows a teepee but references a wigwam.
How about a little sensitivity? Some hatchet packers might take offense to such a line of questioning.
It's been many moons since that happened...'97 was last time we gave up 3 or less to CAL.
I have high standards.
I live in a trailer.
All the comforts of the res, on wheels!
Were @Swaye 's ancestors more like nomadic, teepee Indians or semi-settled longhouse ones? I haven't lurked here long enough to know if this has been covered previously. I also get confused because the premium chat room logo shows a teepee but references a wigwam.
I like to keep people guessing. I'm a hard target.
My people lived in wigwam style homes, but they were called asi. And now you know...
Ah so SEC/ACC Indians, not Big 12 Indians. Duly noted.
Depends. Started out as Georgia injuns, lost badly to smallpox and whitey, moved to Oklahoma. Abudance?
Yep. Got it. Well Andy Jackson is being sanctioned posthumously for the trail of tears so there's that I suppose.
This is another Arizona game to me. Just survive. This will be a tough game for us.
A tough game could be the case, but Cal sucks. We are good. I really can't see their porous D stopping our offense.
Cal's run d ranks between 110 -120 in all major categories nationally. Absymal, atrocious, pourous, pathetic are putting it lightly as to how bad they are.
It actually might hurt us how fast UW could score. Haha.
UW should steamroll Cal's defense. Defensive pressure dictates the outcome here. Webb is far better than Twilliams, and capable of getting into a groove and picking our D apart if he has lots of time. He's also capable of forcing throws and shitting the bed, because a little success gives him a boner, just like our Smiffy, and he'll follow up a great play with a really, really stupid play. Pressure him, and he'll make big mistakes.
Also, FUCK ME for watching Sonny Dykes' team, ever, even for scouting.
Comments
Budda should have taken that pick to the house where he had both hands on the ball. Then jojo had the second opportunity to pick it.
I believe the defense will look to atone for missed chances. Jimmy Lake made note that the secondary will be made very aware of their missed opportunities.
Gaskin and Coleman should both be over a 150 yards rushing this week with Browning not having to throw more than 15-18 times.
Watching the Utah game a second time. Benning Potato was somehow worse than PSALM. PSALM had a couple horrific missed tackles. Vea and Qualls had really poor leverage throughout the game. The o-lineman literally stood them straight up. As Pete says you have get off and shed blocks. Utah had some girth for sure. If these dline guys are listening the NFL hype they better realize it takes more than media hype. There is work to be done for a number of those guys. No news to all you diehards, but Mathis needs to hurry back.
If Utah gets their much wanted second crack at UW I think the result will be much worse for Troy and the rest of his team. Washington brought it's B- game and Utah gave everything they had and it wasn't nearly enough.
To answer the original question, yes I would be happy with 24 or less.
This is another Arizona game to me. Just survive. This will be a tough game for us.
Sorry for the trigger, DDY.
It's cute and all to get to the quarterback rushing only 4, but when pressure needs to be dialed fucking dial it up.
Qbs need to feel uncertainty.
I will say Whittingham is clearly a top level coach. They played like us with Utah level talent. He would be a nightmare at SC.
It actually might hurt us how fast UW could score. Haha.
Also, FUCK ME for watching Sonny Dykes' team, ever, even for scouting.
He is averaging 10 catches a game for 128 yds/g.
I am going to set the O/U on his day at 5 catches for 48 yards.