Home› Tug Tavern

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Did Boobs jump ship?

2

Comments

  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    HFNY said:

    He's had a few flubs but he's the tallest midget in the room and Weld is a great asset.

    If neither Trump nor Hillary reach 270 electoral votes, it goes to the House of Representatives. Johnson / Weld would be a reasonable compromise since the D's and R's have been engaged in mutually assured bukakke.

    Hopefully the Republicans and Democrats settle on much better candidates in 2020.

    CuntWaffle said:

    Johnson was one of the worst things that could have happened to the Libertarian party. They need a candidate who isn't wearing a tin foil hat and know all the letters in the alphabet.

    You expect the party that is willing to leave the supreme court at 8 to compromise on the president?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogiedoogie Member Posts: 15,072
    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Congress doesn't have many jobs. This is just another instance of their inability to do their job.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    HFNY said:

    He's had a few flubs but he's the tallest midget in the room and Weld is a great asset.

    If neither Trump nor Hillary reach 270 electoral votes, it goes to the House of Representatives. Johnson / Weld would be a reasonable compromise since the D's and R's have been engaged in mutually assured bukakke.

    Hopefully the Republicans and Democrats settle on much better candidates in 2020.

    CuntWaffle said:

    Johnson was one of the worst things that could have happened to the Libertarian party. They need a candidate who isn't wearing a tin foil hat and know all the letters in the alphabet.

    If neither of them reach 270, McMullin is the only other option the House legally has.

    Hope this helps.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    The court will continue to refuse to hear cases that have potential to end in a 4-4 split.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,804
    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    dnc said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    Flagged for troll cockblock
    Your welcome Honoda




    I'll see myself out.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,423 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    "he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

    Obunghole doesn't take advice and the senate is not giving consent. Get over it. No more REDS on the supreme court!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KaepskneeKaepsknee Member Posts: 14,886
    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    I've been pushing for an 8 team playoff for years.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • JaWarrenJaHookerJaWarrenJaHooker Member Posts: 2,085
    What the fuck is this bullshit I got a B in poli Sci 101 at Montana you fags. Dumb it down for me
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 34,423 Standard Supporter
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    "he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

    Obunghole doesn't take advice and the senate is not giving consent. Get over it. No more REDS on the supreme court!
    If they don't like Garland, they should vote him down.

    Doing nothing is passive aggressive bullshit.
    They don't have to. Hard concept but eventually you'll get it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AlCzervikAlCzervik Member Posts: 1,774
    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    "he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

    Obunghole doesn't take advice and the senate is not giving consent. Get over it. No more REDS on the supreme court!
    You're not good at this.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • UWhuskytskeetUWhuskytskeet Member Posts: 7,113
    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    "he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

    Obunghole doesn't take advice and the senate is not giving consent. Get over it. No more REDS on the supreme court!
    If they don't like Garland, they should vote him down.

    Doing nothing is passive aggressive bullshit.
    They don't have to. Hard concept but eventually you'll get it.
    It's going to be hilarious when Hillary replaces Garland, an obvious compromise, with an actual liberal.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    "he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

    Obunghole doesn't take advice and the senate is not giving consent. Get over it. No more REDS on the supreme court!
    If they don't like Garland, they should vote him down.

    Doing nothing is passive aggressive bullshit.
    They don't have to. Hard concept but eventually you'll get it.
    Agree. They can choose to be spineless pussies instead and wind up losing the majority.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,804
    UWhuskytskeet said:

    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Sledog said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    dnc said:

    doogie said:

    what is the big deal about an 8 seat court?

    Because the Consitution calls for 9.

    Why do you hate the founders of this nation you pinko fuck???
    Set by statute, not Constitution.
    So Congress needs to follow its own laws and fill vacancies.
    "he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."

    Obunghole doesn't take advice and the senate is not giving consent. Get over it. No more REDS on the supreme court!
    If they don't like Garland, they should vote him down.

    Doing nothing is passive aggressive bullshit.
    They don't have to. Hard concept but eventually you'll get it.
    It's going to be hilarious when Hillary replaces Garland, an obvious compromise, with an actual liberal.
    Why don't you just come out and say you think Scalia was murdered?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.