Former head of pac-12 refs comments on Kevin Smith's catch.

Passion

"Don't agree with the rev in Stan-UW, not indisputable."

No shit fuckhead. Who the fuck trained the current crop of idiots?

Your_Mom

Agree. And what about that BS call on the clean hit during the kickoff return (or whatever return type it was)

Passion

Your_Mom said:

Agree. And what about that BS call on the clean hit during the kickoff return (or whatever return type it was)

Both of those calls were such homer calls. What bullshit. UW should lodge formal complaints to the conference, of course larry scott only cares about california schools so it'll be pointless.

greenblood

The catch call was clear to me. But that kickoff return block call was the most pussified shit I had seen in a long time. But not to be outdone, Sark reclaims his perch with a nice end game cry.

TierbsHsotBoobs

greenblood said:

The catch call was clear to me. But that kickoff return block call was the most pussified shit I had seen in a long time. But not to be outdone, Sark reclaims his perch with a nice end game cry.

All of this is true.

The Pac-12 office confirmed the reversal today, because the ball hit the fucking ground.

[Deleted User]

The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.

TierbsHsotBoobs

He_Needs_More_Time said:

The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.

For the 781st time, there is conclusive evidence of the football on the ground. That's conclusive evidence to overturn in this case.

LoneStarDawg

More importantly if we complain about it online for another week or two they will overturn the game result, 2005seahawksFS

TierbsHsotBoobs

Reduce, reuse, recycle:

Passion

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Reduce, reuse, recycle:

Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.

[Deleted User]

Passion said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Reduce, reuse, recycle:

Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.

jecornel

If that picture shows nothing it is high time I pour gasoline over my head and light a match. It is amazing what people choose to see and not see. Part of the human condition.

The game didn't come to that play plenty of other factors.

HeretoBeatmyChest

A lot of people, who are impartial, said there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call.

Fuck ASJ for not catching it on 3rd down. Never should have gotten to 4th down.

jecornel

you know what everyone should forget about the call and moveon.org it. Doesn't matter.

AlCzervik

Passion said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Reduce, reuse, recycle:

Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.

Passion's dooging it up for reals today.

unfrozencaveman

Mental masturbation - games over and we lost

jecornel

Passion, frankly not your best effort. You have brought a much higher level of discussion then this. We all have our days!

Passion

HeretoBeatmyChest said:

A lot of people, who are impartial, said there wasn't enough evidence to overturn the call.

Exactly. Why would an impartial observor - who also had access to the video and still shots - say that the evidence was inconclusive?

MikeDamone

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Reduce, reuse, recycle:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Reduce, reuse, recycle:

Too gummy

Your_Mom

In that photo it looks like the foot of an ASU player could be underneath the ball.

Gladstone

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.

For the 781st time, there is conclusive evidence of the football on the ground. That's conclusive evidence to overturn in this case.

For the 781st time, you fail to acknowledge the standard of review. The ruling was a catch, so unless you can indisputably prove 1. where his right hand was, and 2. that he did not have control of the ball as the ball touched the ground -- you have no ground to stand on. None. I know your schtick on here is to be the raging sexually frustrated negative nancy, but you come across stupid here dude. Sorry.