Browning Pass Efficiency by Receiver
            Here is Browning's passer efficiency rating by receiver:
Pettis: 256.36
McClatcher: 252.24
Ross: 222.16 (based on my recollection that Browning's first INT was a pass intended for Ross)
All Others: 146.07
Obviously a huge drop off from the Top 3 WRs to everybody else. The All Others rating is right on top of Luke Falk's actual pass efficiency stat. Troy Williams, for reference, is at 127.3 for the season.
I wonder if replacing Pease with Hamdan has made a difference?
Comments
- 
            So Browning is better at passing to Andrew Baccelia and Aaron Fuller than Troy Williams and Luke Falk are to their entire team.
 - 
            
Daniels has more targets than Fuller and Baccelia combined, and Carta-Samuels threw some of those passes to Fuller and Baccelia, but your general point is still accurate.bananasnblondes said:So Browning is better at passing to Andrew Baccelia and Aaron Fuller than Troy Williams and Luke Falk are to their entire team.
 - 
            If I had to nitpick anything about this offense besides the 4th and 1 play call at Arizona, it would be the lack of Daniels. I expected huge things from him this year.
 - 
            If Daniels had hands that average would be higher
 - 
            Why do you hate Baylor?
 - 
            
How did you break this down? Can you remove passes that were thrown away?AIRWOLF said:The NCAA passer efficiency rating isn't great, but it is pretty easy to calculate.
Here is Browning's passer efficiency rating by receiver:
Pettis: 256.36
McClatcher: 252.24
Ross: 222.16 (based on my recollection that Browning's first INT was a pass intended for Ross)
All Others: 146.07
Obviously a huge drop off from the Top 3 WRs to everybody else. The All Others rating is right on top of Luke Falk's actual pass efficiency stat. Troy Williams, for reference, is at 127.3 for the season.
I wonder if replacing Pease with Hamdan has made a difference? - 
            I didn't do anything that sophisticated. Going from memory, I recall Browning's first INT was intended for Ross (I could be wrong) and his second was intented for Gaskin (sure on that one). I also don't recall Carta-Samuels even attempting a pass intended for any of the top 3 receivers. I guess that could be off slightly too, but if it is, it is only by an attempt of two.
 - 
            
He's always been kind of a doog legend. Then again, Mathis was too, but he's been killing it this year.Gladstone said:If I had to nitpick anything about this offense besides the 4th and 1 play call at Arizona, it would be the lack of Daniels. I expected huge things from him this year.
 - 
            Brownings first INT was intended for Chico, but good post
 






