Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Browning Pass Efficiency by Receiver

AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
in Hardcore Husky Board
The NCAA passer efficiency rating isn't great, but it is pretty easy to calculate.

Here is Browning's passer efficiency rating by receiver:

Pettis: 256.36
McClatcher: 252.24
Ross: 222.16 (based on my recollection that Browning's first INT was a pass intended for Ross)

All Others: 146.07

Obviously a huge drop off from the Top 3 WRs to everybody else. The All Others rating is right on top of Luke Falk's actual pass efficiency stat. Troy Williams, for reference, is at 127.3 for the season.

I wonder if replacing Pease with Hamdan has made a difference?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,430
    So Browning is better at passing to Andrew Baccelia and Aaron Fuller than Troy Williams and Luke Falk are to their entire team.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    bananasnblondes said:

    So Browning is better at passing to Andrew Baccelia and Aaron Fuller than Troy Williams and Luke Falk are to their entire team.

    Daniels has more targets than Fuller and Baccelia combined, and Carta-Samuels threw some of those passes to Fuller and Baccelia, but your general point is still accurate.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,924 Swaye's Wigwam
    If Daniels had hands that average would be higher
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Why do you hate Baylor?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744
    AIRWOLF said:

    The NCAA passer efficiency rating isn't great, but it is pretty easy to calculate.

    Here is Browning's passer efficiency rating by receiver:

    Pettis: 256.36
    McClatcher: 252.24
    Ross: 222.16 (based on my recollection that Browning's first INT was a pass intended for Ross)

    All Others: 146.07

    Obviously a huge drop off from the Top 3 WRs to everybody else. The All Others rating is right on top of Luke Falk's actual pass efficiency stat. Troy Williams, for reference, is at 127.3 for the season.

    I wonder if replacing Pease with Hamdan has made a difference?

    How did you break this down? Can you remove passes that were thrown away?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AIRWOLFAIRWOLF Member Posts: 1,840
    I didn't do anything that sophisticated. Going from memory, I recall Browning's first INT was intended for Ross (I could be wrong) and his second was intented for Gaskin (sure on that one). I also don't recall Carta-Samuels even attempting a pass intended for any of the top 3 receivers. I guess that could be off slightly too, but if it is, it is only by an attempt of two.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    Gladstone said:

    If I had to nitpick anything about this offense besides the 4th and 1 play call at Arizona, it would be the lack of Daniels. I expected huge things from him this year.

    He's always been kind of a doog legend. Then again, Mathis was too, but he's been killing it this year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BlowItUpBlowItUp Member Posts: 877
    Brownings first INT was intended for Chico, but good post
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.