Washington 3rd in country in PPG, 7th in PPG Allowed

WilburHooksHands

AIRWOLF said:

RaceBannon said:

Bama has beat USC who boobs says sucks, Ole Piss who pumpy and billy say sucks, Tennessee who is the UW of the East before WE are BACK! this year. And dreck

I'll put UW's opponents against that. Big 10 Rutgers and the two teams that have dominated the Pac 12 since it was formed.

You can only play who is on the schedule.

Bama gets A&M this week who beat UCLA. Barely.

And yes I an kidding about Rutgers

Ohio State will kill Michigan and be the B!G. Bama will win the SEC. The ACC, Big 12 and the PAC 12 are playing for 2 spots

I don't think the Big12 has a chance, unless Clemson loses twice, Louisville loses again and UW loses. Even then, OU may not win out.

I don't think WVU will win out but Holgorsen is my favorite functional alcoholic. He's the best possible version of Sark.

Mad_Son

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

RaceBannon said:

Bama has beat USC who boobs says sucks, Ole Piss who pumpy and billy say sucks, Tennessee who is the UW of the East before WE are BACK! this year. And dreck

I'll put UW's opponents against that. Big 10 Rutgers and the two teams that have dominated the Pac 12 since it was formed.

You can only play who is on the schedule.

Bama gets A&M this week who beat UCLA. Barely.

And yes I an kidding about Rutgers

Ohio State will kill Michigan and be the B!G. Bama will win the SEC. The ACC, Big 12 and the PAC 12 are playing for 2 spots

Ole Piss is 3-3. Are we counting losses against above average teams as moral victories now? They should not be near a top 25.

So should everyone just be ranked by number of wins? I'm sure Western Michigan and Boise State like that approach. The computers like Ole Miss better than the voters do and the computers are a lot better at comparing a huge number of win-loss combinations across varying strengths of schedules than people are.

AIRWOLF

Mad_Son said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

RaceBannon said:

Bama has beat USC who boobs says sucks, Ole Piss who pumpy and billy say sucks, Tennessee who is the UW of the East before WE are BACK! this year. And dreck

I'll put UW's opponents against that. Big 10 Rutgers and the two teams that have dominated the Pac 12 since it was formed.

You can only play who is on the schedule.

Bama gets A&M this week who beat UCLA. Barely.

And yes I an kidding about Rutgers

Ohio State will kill Michigan and be the B!G. Bama will win the SEC. The ACC, Big 12 and the PAC 12 are playing for 2 spots

Ole Piss is 3-3. Are we counting losses against above average teams as moral victories now? They should not be near a top 25.

So should everyone just be ranked by number of wins? I'm sure Western Michigan and Boise State like that approach. The computers like Ole Miss better than the voters do and the computers are a lot better at comparing a huge number of win-loss combinations across varying strengths of schedules than people are.

You are trying to make a sensible point to somebody who just wrote "Ole Piss".

doogie

So, Washington is scoring 4 points per game too many to be considered legit?

TierbsHsotBoobs

CuntWaffle said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

CuntWaffle said:

Ranked higher than Bama in both categories

Alabama has played a good schedule.

Washington has played crap.

Losers make excuses

I know this bugs you dearly

Beating crap teams is great, but it doesn't prove you can beat great teams.

Fortunately UW won't see any of those until the CFP.

FremontTroll

Mad_Son said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

RaceBannon said:

Bama has beat USC who boobs says sucks, Ole Piss who pumpy and billy say sucks, Tennessee who is the UW of the East before WE are BACK! this year. And dreck

I'll put UW's opponents against that. Big 10 Rutgers and the two teams that have dominated the Pac 12 since it was formed.

You can only play who is on the schedule.

Bama gets A&M this week who beat UCLA. Barely.

And yes I an kidding about Rutgers

Ohio State will kill Michigan and be the B!G. Bama will win the SEC. The ACC, Big 12 and the PAC 12 are playing for 2 spots

Ole Piss is 3-3. Are we counting losses against above average teams as moral victories now? They should not be near a top 25.

So should everyone just be ranked by number of wins? I'm sure Western Michigan and Boise State like that approach. The computers like Ole Miss better than the voters do and the computers are a lot better at comparing a huge number of win-loss combinations across varying strengths of schedules than people are.

Sagarin Predictor (and all the shitty computers) are power ranking.

It is generally understood that the Coaches' Poll and the AP Poll are accomplishment rankings.

Except when it comes to the SEC in which case tough losses and moral victories are huge accomplishments.