Browning's Finger Point td

HuskyJW

Shouldnt have counted.

Damn I'm pathetic.

SpoonieLuv

PurpleBaze

It's nice to get away with one every now & then.

The Huskies have had their share of getting shit on by officials.

Glad the TD counted, especially since it set the tone for the rest of the game.

Fuck Oregon!

Mad_Son

What's the issue? Is taunting a deadball foul or something?

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Mad_Son said:

What's the issue? Is taunting a deadball foul or something?

I think there's a newer rule that penalizes tainting before a TD is scored. In that case, it'd be a 15-yard penalty and first & goal from the 16.

GrundleStiltzkin

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

Mad_Son said:

What's the issue? Is taunting a deadball foul or something?

I think there's a newer rule that penalizes tainting before a TD is scored. In that case, it'd be a 15-yard penalty and first & goal from the 16.

I'm feeling persecuted.

doogie

I resent the implication PAC-12 refs fucked up the rule(s)

SpoonieLuv

PurpleBaze said:

It's nice to get away with one every now & then.

The Huskies have had their share of getting shit on by officials.

Glad the TD counted, especially since it set the tone for the rest of the game.

Fuck Oregon!

Alexis

I would have liked to see the 15 yarder, and then still shove it in 2 plays later.

Taste it!

Meek

yes, because Oregon has never won a game at home because of beneficial Pac12 reffing.

i can't recall the specific game but it was a season opener at home against Nebraska or Oklahoma or someone and Oregon only won because of some bad reffing decision near the end maybe on a kick off or something.

Doogstone

^

CuntWaffle

Even if it didn't count UW would have scored again on the next play.

Doogles

That is the worst rule change in college football. You should not be allowed to take points off the board that are won on the field because your feelings are hurt.

HanseeHall78

Was the taunting penalty based upon the finger point only or also the trash talking after he was in the end zone?

ThomasFremont

Doogstone said:

^

I'll never forget watching that game while visiting a buddy in California. He liked the bad call because it was "good for the conference"...

We're not friends anymore.

dflea

ThomasFremont said:

Doogstone said:

^

I'll never forget watching that game while visiting a buddy in California. He liked the bad call because it was "good for the conference"...

We're not friends anymore.

Because you killed him, right?

doogsinparadise

Taunting should mandated.

Fenderbender123

The call was correct. Pointing at opposing players during a play is legal. It happens every game. One example would be when the QB scrambles and points at a defender that he wants one of his teammates to block. As soon as Jake crossed the goal line, the play became dead, which made it against the rules to point at opposing players.

dhdawg

Doogstone said:

^

"there was conclusive evidence that the ball was touched by a receiving team player"

dhdawg

what's amazing is that wasn't even the biggest fuckup in that play. even after ruling the recovery in favor of Oregon they called it as being touched before 10 yards and then they overturned that call despite 0 evidence to support it.

DeepSeaZ

dhdawg said:

Doogstone said:

^

"there was conclusive evidence that the ball was touched by a receiving team player"

Was the touching consensual?