Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Huskies’ dominance reminiscent of ’91 national championship team
Comments
-
Vita Vea and Greg Gaines are freaks of nature.
-
Christ
-
Signs point to you becoming an alcoholic one day. I support this.backthepack said:
I should really consider using paragraphs, yes? Jesus christ i ramble worse than Dick BairdDerekJohnson said:
Next time I have a sit down with PurpleJ to discuss bandwidth conservation, I'll sit down too with this lad to explain consolidating multiple thoughts into one coherent post.dnc said:backthepack said:Pettis seems like a UDFA type that ends up on roster (Seahawks) bet he will replace Kearse.
backthepack said:Mathis will be a late to mid round pick depending on his combine imo.. Gardenhire will play in the league he has size and length *faggy wink*.. Bierra fits today's modern NFL and his size is similar to Bobby Wagner both shorter and athletic..
backthepack said:Gaskin will play in the league no question
backthepack said:I bet a couple of our redshirts and some of our young depth will play in the NFL which is scary
I don't really disagree with anything you said here, but holy shit, 5 straight poasts?backthepack said:Browning is a rich man's kellen moore
Shouldn't you be in third period right now? -
Totally agree. This is a very talented team with a number of future NFL players on it, and they play like Huskies, bad motherfuckers and all. Best part is it's also a very young team. In that regard it is like 1990 all over again. But, the season is only half over, let's see how they respond to having a target on their backs.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't want to compare to 91, but this team has a lot of NFL players.Doogles said:
Yeah but the uncle Rico effect will be real if the 2016 dawgs run the table.PurpleThrobber said:If you asked any of the '91 dawgs, they'd laugh hysterically at the comparison.
Those were bad motherfuckers.
This team is full of bad bad men too.
Certain NFL players: Adams, McGary, Ross, Jones, King, Budda Baker, Victor, Qualls, Gaines, Vea...
Probable: Gaskin, Browning, Pettis, Mathis... Browning seems small, but he's listed on NFL lists as one of the top QB's for his year.
Eldrenkamp will get a shot. I have no clue about Coleman Shelton, but he's a four year starter who has played multiple positions. Bierria might be too small, but at minimum he's a very good college LB. Gardenhire started over King at times last year. I actually think Coleman will be in a camp. The team is loaded. -
Gaines is a fucking beast man, and remember hes young. If his trajectory continues when he is a senior he is for real going to be an Empterman type. Dude is legit.
-
By the time Polk left his speed had become pretty average. He came in as a burner.RoadDawg55 said:
I think so, but RB is a hard position. He's not very big either. Polk was a great college RB and went undrafted.backthepack said:Gaskin will play in the league no question
But your point is a good one, smallish, quick running backs are a dime a dozen at the NFL level. -
The bolded is the best part. Though I certainly hope they don't have a UCLA game in them. I could probably deal with a loss without completely losing my shit, but not if it came against a real dreck team, like that fucking UCLA squad.Southerndawg said:
Totally agree. This is a very talented team with a number of future NFL players on it, and they play like Huskies, bad motherfuckers and all. Best part is it's also a very young team. In that regard it is like 1990 all over again. But, the season is only half over, let's see how they respond to having a target on their backs.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't want to compare to 91, but this team has a lot of NFL players.Doogles said:
Yeah but the uncle Rico effect will be real if the 2016 dawgs run the table.PurpleThrobber said:If you asked any of the '91 dawgs, they'd laugh hysterically at the comparison.
Those were bad motherfuckers.
This team is full of bad bad men too.
Certain NFL players: Adams, McGary, Ross, Jones, King, Budda Baker, Victor, Qualls, Gaines, Vea...
Probable: Gaskin, Browning, Pettis, Mathis... Browning seems small, but he's listed on NFL lists as one of the top QB's for his year.
Eldrenkamp will get a shot. I have no clue about Coleman Shelton, but he's a four year starter who has played multiple positions. Bierria might be too small, but at minimum he's a very good college LB. Gardenhire started over King at times last year. I actually think Coleman will be in a camp. The team is loaded.
I loved the 91 squad and the 90 and 92 teams were really good too, but the thing that is so different now versus 25 years ago is the offenses in the college game. Lambright's defensive scheme was a perfect way to attack traditional college offenses. It also put some players who were odd fits for traditional positions into roles where they could excel. And it was new in 90 and 91 and other teams hadn't figured out how to deal with it, sort of like true spread offenses were 10 or so years ago.
Once the talent dropped off even a little and other teams figured out that they couldn't line up in an I-formation and beat the 46, it started getting gashed.
-
He's more physically impressive than Kearse, I would guess he'll be drafted before the 7th round.backthepack said:Pettis seems like a UDFA type that ends up on roster (Seahawks) bet he will replace Kearse.
-
Well that and he's not famous for dropping as many as he caught.doogsinparadise said:
He's more physically impressive than Kearse, I would guess he'll be drafted before the 7th round.backthepack said:Pettis seems like a UDFA type that ends up on roster (Seahawks) bet he will replace Kearse.
-
Yes most likely i forgot he was just a junior... Don't think he has mid round production up to this point, but could end up seeing him as 3-7 round pick when he enters.. But what do i know.doogsinparadise said:
He's more physically impressive than Kearse, I would guess he'll be drafted before the 7th round.backthepack said:Pettis seems like a UDFA type that ends up on roster (Seahawks) bet he will replace Kearse.
