Reminiscent maybe, and I really like this team, but that comparison is way too premature.
Through the first six games the '91 team played two top 10 teams that finished the season highly ranked, including one (Nebraska) on the road. And of course they continued dominating opponents on their way to an unbeaten season and a national championship trophy. That was one of the best college football teams of all time.
This 2016 team has yet to face an opponent that is still ranked. I love these guys, the past two plus weeks have been fantastic, but they're still in #Proveit mode. And what initially looked like a front loaded schedule now looks heavily back loaded. At this point I would be disappointed, but not be shocked, to see them still lose a game or two.
Probable: Gaskin, Browning, Pettis, Mathis... Browning seems small, but he's listed on NFL lists as one of the top QB's for his year.
Eldrenkamp will get a shot. I have no clue about Coleman Shelton, but he's a four year starter who has played multiple positions. Bierria might be too small, but at minimum he's a very good college LB. Gardenhire started over King at times last year. I actually think Coleman will be in a camp. The team is loaded.
Mathis will be a late to mid round pick depending on his combine imo.. Gardenhire will play in the league he has size and length *faggy wink*.. Bierra fits today's modern NFL and his size is similar to Bobby Wagner both shorter and athletic..
Mathis will be a late to mid round pick depending on his combine imo.. Gardenhire will play in the league he has size and length *faggy wink*.. Bierra fits today's modern NFL and his size is similar to Bobby Wagner both shorter and athletic..
Probable: Gaskin, Browning, Pettis, Mathis... Browning seems small, but he's listed on NFL lists as one of the top QB's for his year.
Eldrenkamp will get a shot. I have no clue about Coleman Shelton, but he's a four year starter who has played multiple positions. Bierria might be too small, but at minimum he's a very good college LB. Gardenhire started over King at times last year. I actually think Coleman will be in a camp. The team is loaded.
That's my point. If you go down the line, the man for man talent isn't that far off. Obviously I could give a fuck about NFL success over team success at Washington, but it's not crazy to say Vea, Gaines, and Qualls won't have better pro careers than emtman. Or Ross is better than Bailey. Or the entire secondary isn't better than the 91 guys.
Now if they lose to Cal we can all shut the fuck up about it. The bar 91 set is extremely high in college and that's all that matters. If 2016 reaches that place and the tiebreak goes to NFL success, it won't be that hard to argue they're better.
Mathis will be a late to mid round pick depending on his combine imo.. Gardenhire will play in the league he has size and length *faggy wink*.. Bierra fits today's modern NFL and his size is similar to Bobby Wagner both shorter and athletic..
I don't really disagree with anything you said here, but holy shit, 5 straight poasts?
Shouldn't you be in third period right now?
Next time I have a sit down with PurpleJ to discuss bandwidth conservation, I'll sit down too with this lad to explain consolidating multiple thoughts into one coherent post.
Mathis will be a late to mid round pick depending on his combine imo.. Gardenhire will play in the league he has size and length *faggy wink*.. Bierra fits today's modern NFL and his size is similar to Bobby Wagner both shorter and athletic..
Mathis will be a late to mid round pick depending on his combine imo.. Gardenhire will play in the league he has size and length *faggy wink*.. Bierra fits today's modern NFL and his size is similar to Bobby Wagner both shorter and athletic..
I don't really disagree with anything you said here, but holy shit, 5 straight poasts?
Shouldn't you be in third period right now?
Next time I have a sit down with PurpleJ to discuss bandwidth conservation, I'll sit down too with this lad to explain consolidating multiple thoughts into one coherent post.
I should really consider using paragraphs, yes? Jesus christ i ramble worse than Dick Baird
Comments
Reminiscent maybe, and I really like this team, but that comparison is way too premature.
Through the first six games the '91 team played two top 10 teams that finished the season highly ranked, including one (Nebraska) on the road. And of course they continued dominating opponents on their way to an unbeaten season and a national championship trophy. That was one of the best college football teams of all time.
This 2016 team has yet to face an opponent that is still ranked. I love these guys, the past two plus weeks have been fantastic, but they're still in #Proveit mode. And what initially looked like a front loaded schedule now looks heavily back loaded. At this point I would be disappointed, but not be shocked, to see them still lose a game or two.
Those were bad motherfuckers.
This team is full of bad bad men too.
Certain NFL players: Adams, McGary, Ross, Jones, King, Budda Baker, Victor, Qualls, Gaines, Vea...
Probable: Gaskin, Browning, Pettis, Mathis... Browning seems small, but he's listed on NFL lists as one of the top QB's for his year.
Eldrenkamp will get a shot. I have no clue about Coleman Shelton, but he's a four year starter who has played multiple positions. Bierria might be too small, but at minimum he's a very good college LB. Gardenhire started over King at times last year. I actually think Coleman will be in a camp. The team is loaded.
Shouldn't you be in third period right now?
Now if they lose to Cal we can all shut the fuck up about it. The bar 91 set is extremely high in college and that's all that matters. If 2016 reaches that place and the tiebreak goes to NFL success, it won't be that hard to argue they're better.