eSuck: The Morning after
Comments
-
@Canard writes for FishQuook.doogsinparadise said:Be warned, that's the quookliest article that I've ever read. (Low bar, yadda yadda)
"Look at Chip Kelly’s three-plus years in the NFL. He may still prove himself successful with the 49ers, or another pro team after that. But many, including FishDuck.com stalwarts such as founder Charles Fisher and “Grizzled Old Coach” Mike Morris, see Helfrich innovating more with new plays for Oregon’s offense than Kelly has in Philadelphia or San Francisco. Could it actually be that behind the grand vision of a no-huddle blur offense and the ensuing cult of personality Oregon fans and the media have given Kelly, that Helfrich was his secret weapon?"
Case closed.
-
That argument will still be valid after this season when Peterman goes from 7-6 to winning the Pac-12.doogsinparadise said:fishduck.com/2016/10/must-you-keep-the-faith-with-the-oregon-ducks/
"But David Shaw went 7-6 and then won the Rose Bowl." -
"Yet even if Oregon doesn’t win another game this year, the retention of Helfrich is such a no-brainer that in a certain respect I regret even dignifying it with this post. Yet defending Helfrich has to be done, because the clamor for his head has become surprisingly deafening for this early in the season."
Christ, were Doogs this doogly? -
Yes.doogsinparadise said:"Yet even if Oregon doesn’t win another game this year, the retention of Helfrich is such a no-brainer that in a certain respect I regret even dignifying it with this post. Yet defending Helfrich has to be done, because the clamor for his head has become surprisingly deafening for this early in the season."
Christ, were Doogs this doogly?
That's the same shit we saw for Ty in 2007. -
Loser fans, loser program. Enough said.
-
They have a test case on what not to do right in front of them (Us?) and yet they still don't get it. Already seeing the "but who would you hire" excuses.
-
The Ernie to Altman thing should be proof enough.doogsinparadise said:They have a test case on what not to do right in front of them (Us?) and yet they still don't get it. Already seeing the "but who would you hire" excuses.
Ohio State is the greatest example. They were awesome under Tress, went like 6-6 with the one season under that Adam Sandler looking guy, and have lost like five games under Urban Meyer.
College football is about the head coach and the QB. If you have one you're not bad, if you have both you're a juggernaut. -
then there is no gawd. There are dawgs though.doogsinparadise said:Sorry Fenwick, I guess you're just going to have to stick it out for 17 years with Helf.
-
Belotti said Oregon built it's program in the image of Washington's early 90's teams. Tracking along, this is Oregon's 2003. Fire Helfrich, hire a worse coach, then fire him and hire some castaway for political reasons like UW did. Enjoy the remainder of the decade.
-
Unless you're Nick Saban. Then you don't need a quarterback.Mosster47 said:
The Ernie to Altman thing should be proof enough.doogsinparadise said:They have a test case on what not to do right in front of them (Us?) and yet they still don't get it. Already seeing the "but who would you hire" excuses.
Ohio State is the greatest example. They were awesome under Tress, went like 6-6 with the one season under that Adam Sandler looking guy, and have lost like five games under Urban Meyer.
College football is about the head coach and the QB. If you have one you're not bad, if you have both you're a juggernaut.




